They're not. Even if they were the power of Satanic quints would overcome it.
Just make it a point to send feedbacks whenever a SFW thread gets deleted.
Probably just some dumbass new janitor who doesn't know how things work. (Makes me regret not applying if fags are the best they can get.)
>manga where the selling point is a loli succubi who literally needs to drink semen to survive
>manga will never actually feature her drinking semen canonically- offscreen or otherwise
Fuck this gay earth.
I don't get why people don't like lolis. No actual kids are harmed or even affected by their existence. Most people who like them (on here at least) are disgusted by the thought of interacting with anything 3D and would never look at a real kid that way. If anything, governments should be pushing this shit on pedophiles to try and stop them from wanting to diddle real kids.
Maybe he means lolis are banned because they make people think of crimes. I know every time I see a loli I can't stop thinking about carjacking. I mean, every time I see a loli my mind immediately goes to jacking it.
The type that's small,cuddly and has a cute butt.
Me with the nopan on the bottom right.
>Why are lolis so banned?
In my country, Britain, loli (artwork) is banned if it meets the following criteria:
>1. Would a reasonable person, given the totality of the circumstances, believe the article in question (the depiction) contains a girl who appears to be underage?
>2. [Would a reasonable person ... circumstances] believe the article contains sexually explicit, derogatory, lascivious, or crude elements AND (see 3);
>3. Does the article lack series literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?
>If the article meets constraints 1-3, it is not protected by A.10 §. 13-15 (Free Expression clause).
No idea where you got that from, but it's wrong. It's banned if all 3 of the following apply:
1) A reasonable person would think that the image (or set of images if part of a set) was produced for the purposes of sexual gratification
2) The image focuses solely or principally on the genitals or anal region of the child, or the image depicts one of a shopping list of sexual acts being performed on or in the presence of a child
3) The image is obscene (don't get me started on what constitutes obscenity)
A "child" is defined as someone who a reasonable person would think was under 18. So a 500 year old loli is a child, but so is someone with a fully adult body if the context of the image implies the person is under 18.
There is no exception for things of literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
The BBFC (which classifies this shit) claims that there is no such thing as female ejaculation and that it's really pissing. You can show sex, you can show pissing, but you can't show pissing and sex. So because FE is supposedly pissing and it occurs at the point of orgasm, which is during sex, it's banned.
>not loving all lolis
There's just more of them to love, anon.