zup ol fag here, how about some art? contribute...
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network issues. Refreshing the page usually helps. The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact. You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random
As a proud member of Anonymous working with other members in Anonymous with #OPInnocence #OPPedoHunt I report all threads that depict / and or otherwise sexualize children or show questionable content.
These threads and its content can be but are are not limited to 'Too Young For Those Tits (TYFTT), Too Young For That Ass (TYFTA), Pre-Teen & Teen (JB), Young Girls, Cute Little Girls, Young Candid, and this also includes such threads 'Bad Parenting, Creep shot, You Love You Loose, Guess Her Age, Nudism' as these can often be places where such violations are performed with pictures of underage girls and boys being posted.
We must also mention that threads/images that sexualize underage girls that are drawn, sketched, animated or crafted, (Known as Lolicon) are just as bad as the real thing and is also in violation of rules of not just 4chan but the Adam Walsh Act and the laws of the United States Of America (18+ Required Law) and Human Rights Act.
We in Legion thank the Janitors & Moderators of 4chan who listen to our reports and work with us along with the interception and help from the FBI, LEA, Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), New York Police Department, Google & Microsoft in working together to help stop child exploitation and abuse.
Remember, we must protect the children as they are our future - the future of Legion!
Never stop fighting the vile scum of this Earth such as pedophiles and child molestors!
We shutdown Freedom Hosting, OPVA, CPHeaven and many more deep web sites we can do even more!
If you help, support, produce, assist or in any other way endorse child sexual abuse we will find you.
We Are Anonymous We Do Not Forgive Child Molestors We Do Not Forget The Children That Have Suffered
>>554790479 i couldn't give a shit if his "work" is "art" it's still pre-pubescent girls with their vaginas open to the air and the lens. which is wrong.
however, if you want to just admit that you fap to it, and get it over with, we all might be a little more forgiving. It's pretentious pricks like you who look at images of naked kids, and say it's "art" that make me sick.
if you're gonna jack off to a kid, own it, don't try to pass it off as some kind of "hurr nurr nurr, the play of light on the peach fuzz adorning her vaginal lips is a perfect example of post-modernist contrasts, especially when held in conjunction with what the dildo up her ass says about the communists" pretence.
>>554791213 Their vaginas aren't visible you biological failure. You can see their slit sure. But it isn't being shown in a sexual way, nor are there any images here of them being molested, nor masturbating nor taking a cock real or artificial. They are simply naked children. Is nudity that taboo for you? That you vilify everyone for being naked in public or in art? Get a hold of your hormones before you go and rape someone just for seeing them naked.
>>554785409 >>554790365 >>554790596 >>554790765 >>554791213 >>554791765 Aside from the fact there is nothing wrong with this thread, and taking into account that you might be serious (if not, this is sucha bad trolling everytime), I always wonder, what did you expect when you first entered /b/? A world filled with fun, rainbows and ponies (the latter might be true tho)? What made you move to visit this board? Was it the movie Smiley (or something like that), or those news articles about "anonymous" and "how they change the world"? Because you being here bitches how we all are pedo's won't make a difference. The feds tracking us? Not everyone of us live in the UN of 'Mrica you know. You probably watched too many movies about the FBI busting peoples homes. Go back to Facebook, 9Gag or Tumblr or whatever shithole you came from, 'cus this ain't a place for you faggots.
>>554792094 how the fuck do we find it sexual, we are disgusted you are just casually posting naked underage girls like its nothing, and dont give me some bullshit excuse that your just enjoying the art. we all know what you pedoshits are up to The only reason they post "softcore" pictures is because they can't get away with posting the hardcore stuff they have stored on their hard drives.
>>554792154 here's the thing... I simply don't care, the guy is posting pictures of young girls, where 'you can see their slits, sure'. on... dun dun dun... /b/ a haven for paedophiles, and people who are just plain wrong in the head (no offence guys, I love you just the same)
what do you, Mr Smarty Pants, think this guy was hoping to acheive?
>>554792641 hahaha, you imbecile, I'm just loving every minute of this.
At what point did I suggest that I was shocked by anything in here? every one of my statements has held fast to the ideal that, yes, nudity in images is something that should not be pre-pubescent, but I believe if you read back I mentioned that I wasn't going to hold it against anyone if they just came out and owned what they were doing.
>>554792891 You probably dropped out of school or something, 'cus there ain't no kind of so-called pornography in this thread. This is called art (not my kind of taste tho), and you seem to never be educated on what art can be. There is nothing like spread vags, penis in vag or other sexual activities going on in the picture, and the picture is made solely for art reasons. I guess you must be retarted, or 12 years old since you don't seem to understand the difference between art and pornography. Even some kind of pornography is considered art, bus I think that's a step too high for a pleb like you.
7 warnings before publishing pictures of your children on the social network
1. Never upload pictures showing your children modelling on anonymous sites as it can be used for arousal and shared sullying your childs identity naked. While taking pictures of babies when they are taking a bath is cute, or even if they are running with their diaper on, we should never do it. There are people with horrible intentions that dedicate their time to collecting pictures of infants with little or no clothing to satisfy their vile intentions. Pornography effects are terrible.
2. Avoid uploading daily images of your young ones. This is dangerous because it makes you vulnerable. You are exposing your family’s safety.
3. If you upload pictures taken in your home to a site on the net, try to avoid taking it in a place where you show expensive items, TV, computers, even the car. The image can be seen by your friend’s contacts (people you haven’t met) and you don’t know if any of them will be interested in your property.
4. When you share family pictures in public places, avoid any place that reveals where you live, such as the street name or the home’s entry.
5. Pay attention to the way you name the pictures. This is the point where you share valuable information. For example, “Here I am getting out of the school ______, I always do it at 2 p.m.”
6. Erase your album pictures after a few days.
7. Do not upload pictures of your babies or children in compromising situations, or with silly poses. It may be common to turn into a shared joke a million times during Internet memes.
We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us. We are coming for you pedophiles.
>>554792715 That's a nice beach. All the beaches here suck. It's always crowded and super rocky. I just want a nice desolate beach with soft white sands and calm blue waves. Fuck that shit. I'm going to Tahiti as soon as I can.
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/124/1/22/ "Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and than men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported."
Us oppressed pedophiles need to oust these bigoted, anti-pedophile scumbags. Their bigotry is not supported by science and results in enormous suffering for adults and children alike.
>>554792154 Its sad that people have been coached by the media and masses to believe that if a child is seen naked the the seer is a paedophile. Should mom's and dad's be locked up for taking a picture of their kids in the bath? There is a massive difference between cp and what is posted here. Some of these pictures are beautiful. I personally don't know how anyone could get aroused to any of it, but then again I am not a pervert, if it was cp, i could understand the outcry by the idiots on this board but it isn't. You people need to grow up start thinking for yourself s.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.