Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network issues. Refreshing the page usually helps. The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact. You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random
hookers exist, and they fuck anything as long as u dont stink to hell.
take a bath, brush ur teeth, go on eccie, order a hooker, lose virginity, and stop crying. its not hard unless u live with ur fucking parents. and even then nothing is stopping u from going to the hookers location at some random hotel unless u dont have a car.
and even if u dont have a car u can take a fucking taxi/cab, and if u cant take a taxi/cab u can ask ur friend, and if u dont have friends then u can ride a bike, if u dont have a bike u can fucking walk.
literally zero excuse to still be a virgin in 2014 or choose to remain virgin all ur life.
if you are still crying about not getting pussy then you are something that goes BEYOND that of a failure.
>>556473214 This specific girl no...I'm not on my primary computer, but I DO have a great set that is of a man, a woman, and a bitch. The girl does things like finger the dog, tongue the dog, suck the mans cock while fingering the bitch, hold her steady while he fucks the bitch.
>>556478040 >>556478053 >>556476914 Honestly, find a zoophilia forum or a zoophilia website and look around for how-to guides and stuff. They used to be pretty easy to find back when I did my research but who knows how censorship on the internet and social justice warriors have made it difficult to find good zoophilia information.
The general rule of thumb is that dogs have larger genitals than humans, ESPECIALLY the knot, so you will want to do a lot of anal training before you even CONSIDER letting a dog fuck you. And you'll want to stick to a mid-breed dog like lab or smaller, unless you know for a fact that you can take cock like a champion.
Honestly if your dog is intact, and you're a good owner, and you have taught them to be comfortable with you handling their genitals, and you don't scold them too much for sexual displays, getting a dog to fuck you is NOT hard.
Create obvious boundaries for your dog, like "Clothing on = stay down, clothing off = show me that pussy/mount me any time you want"
>>556481094 actually, I've run into several fixed male dogs that have gotten errections. Sadly people have always been around so i've never been able to play with it.
Assorted breeds of terriers are especially known for being randy as fuck even fixed...one clients dog gets hard every couple of months without any stimulation...in the right hands that six inch little cock would be useful several times a fucking day.
>>556481567 It probably depends on when they were fixed. In the USA it's very common for males to be fixed before puberty. I tried to jerk off a fixed dog once. He enjoyed the attention but didn't even get erect from it, so kind of a waste IMO.
>>556481802 That doesn't really change things...I mean sure, his cock will probably be smaller, but "once' isn't exactly a strident scientific experiment, either. Sometimes NONfixed dogs won't get hard from a little play.
Getting your time alone with a dog is problematic, true...but this calls for further studies /bro/s. Start dog sitting and see how many "fixed" dogs can be convinced into getting a hardon.
And look at it this way...if he CAN'T get hard, it makes it even easier to fuck his sheath. I have no idea why that isn't done more often...a hole's a hole, right boys?
I know that if anyone can find it, you can, /b/. Find me a legit image/video of a man actually fucking a female dolphin. I want a good shot of the guy's cock disapearing into the dolphin's pussy too, not some obscure shot where you can't see shit. And here's my contribution, sweet lioness pussy.
>>556483859 I've actually seen images of a woman getting laid by a male dolphin, though due to the images being taken in a park they wouldn't upload video or any shots that showed anything good for fear of people that worked there finding out and them getting arrested for it.
It wasn't talked about.... she was drunk one night and slumped over the couch in her underwear and he mounted her. No insertion but he came all over her butt lol. She let it happen and talked to me during it. After that we talked about her doing more and now she lets him mount her.
>>556485378 >All those girls saying they were like 10 or 15
You know, the confessions of 'deviant' women are pretty much the best proof in the world that young girls enjoy and initiate sexual encounters. The world is just so brainwashed to think that under-18 girls just magically have no sex drive or curiosity and any one of them can tell you it's bullshit.
But it's not PC so the media will never give them recognition...
>>556486179 now, i dont support pedophilia at all. But it is true that girls young as 10 can enjoy sexual activity if they personally seek it out. I dont have any crazy incest stories, just what my girlfriend told me about her learning to masturbate and enjoying it by age 12
>>556486726 I can buy legal consent as far as children go, because they're still humans and thus they have civil rights, yadda yadda.
I don't buy consent for animals. It's kinda ass backward that we can mutilate our pets' genitals, force them to breed, kill them, neglect them, etc--don't need consent for any of THAT, but if we bring a penis into the equation, suddenly consent is required, even though a dog arguably ENJOYS sex.
>>556487201 That's actually pretty much EXACTLY my argument in favor of zoophilia. Until it becomes illegal to breed animals, put them down, or kill them for food, it's absolutely silly that it's "illegal" to give one a blowjob...or hold one down and rape it.
The things I do to every chicken I get alone with are FAR less painful and evil than factory farming...
>>556487837 Didn't save them at the time and don't feel like retrieving them for you. A free account is easy to make and you'll have access to a shit-load of home-made videos and pictures along with a shit-load of stories all for free.
>>556488153 Pretty much everyone in this thread shares the same view, it's only OK as long as the animal enjoys it!
The people that are violently against it refuse to even entertain the idea that animals actually enjoy sex.
You could argue that by fucking your animals you put them at risk of being euthanised if you are ever discovered and arrested though. How fucked up is that? The society that claims to want to "protect" the animals are really quick to kill them.
My heart raced a lot. I remember being concerned she'd get hurt. I read about it a bit on here before we went full knot, etc. I remember him humping like three times faster than I thought he would and he looked bigger than when she would just jerk him.
>>556488693 I always find it amusing how my female dog will eagerly stand still in my bedroom waiting patiently for me to lube up and enter her, even when she's not in heat, but when i give her a shower she's desperately trying to escape the whole time :)
>>556489135 It's the mysterious googlefish. You can find more about it on google. [spoiler]It's a fucking dolphin and using the search would have answered your question without taking two posts.[/spoiler]
You know, I linked some people to some medical journals detailing why 'fixing' does so much harm, in addition to not actually solving any of the problems other than pregnancy (which can be solved by just being a responsible pet owner).
Not only did people not agree with me, they verbally assaulted me, telling me that I'm some kind of psycho that's just as bad as the anti-vaccination Christians, that I had no idea what I'm talking about and they hope I never owned a pet.
I didn't even mention fucking them. I was just like "Hey, here's like a pile of information detailing the health problems that animals suffer when you neuter them." and even having all that information, everybody is too convinced that fixing is the only "right" way to own a pet, because of all the commercials they used to run in the 90s. It's so fucking stupid.
Most pet owners are painfully ignorant of the physical and mental needs of their own animals, and I'm the bad guy for wanting to hump a horny dog?
>>556488886 Oh, but the dog has suffered too much trauma to be given to a new home!
Imagine that. You take a dog that had a loving owner and a comfortable, regular sex life, you take away their owner, you surgically remove their genitals (because fixing pets is required by law in most states when they go to a shelter) and then you throw them in a fucking kennel.
Wouldn't YOU be terrified and emotionally scarred for life?
>>556489981 You know most of Europe doesn't have their pets spayed or neutered. Just google something like "Why I shouldn't neuter my dog" or whatever and you'll find tons of websites, the better ones will have citations that link directly to medical studies.
>>556490210 I have, and as a son of a veterinarian they do sound like the anti-vaccine websites. Note I ask for peer-reviewed accounts for a very important reason: people claiming to know what's best for their animals come with terrible advice done as contrarian hysteria because they "are the only ones who truly know what to do with their pets". And that's without going into the whole issue most of the studies (peer-reviewed or otherwise) speak of the timing of the spay rather than the necessity of it, so I'm even less inclined to simply go "you are right, anon, let me follow your words blindly".
>>556492343 Unfortunately, convenience is the ENTIRE reason in the US.
I don't want my pet to get pregnant! >Then keep an eye on it, lazy bitch. I don't want my pet to hump things! >That's an aggression behavior. Fixing doesn't affect it at all. I don't want my pet to fight other animals! >That's an aggression and socialization issue. Make your pet spend time socializing with other animals and train them to not be aggressive. Well, fixing pets prevents some diseases! >Yeah, it does... in so much as a dog without testes can't have testicular cancer. Too bad it makes obesity and joint problems worse!
Amerifats, building entire legal systems and medical propaganda around being as lazy as possible.
>>556491338 >http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0055937#pone-0055937-g001 I don't understand the study as much as you think you do. In fact, you don't understand it all. Most, if not all, the diseases showed no statistically significant difference between the two, in addition to the fact of how the pool was selected (university veterinarian animals, keeping intacts bound to a specific age group, small groups of both late and intact dogs, etc.) make the study not a reliable account for actual health benefits or detriments in the whole dog population. In general, the study is a good starting point, but a poor thing to grab conclusions from as the pool is very flawed. And I won't even go into issues of methodology.
Fucking hell, didn't the whole "I'm the son of a veterinarian" tell you that you would need to be careful what you brought to me as evidence, as I know how to read these things quite a lot more carefully than a random b-tard?
>>556489472 Hormone imbalances are just the start. Being "fixed" is just the same for an animal as it is for a human, chemically...and the risks for a human involve brittle bone disease and cancer, among countless others.
Disregard how fun it is to suck animal cock and fuck animal holes. Disregard how hot it is to slide a big hard dog cock into a fertile dog pussy...even if you use a condom on him. Disregard the joy of having an entire litter of puppies licking you. Disregard every recreational aspect of having intact, healthy, horny animals.
You're cutting 1/3'd of your animals healthy fucking life potential out.
>>556494000 Not really, he's more like the anti circumcision movement. Which is an equally meaningless, risky medical procedure. Besides, being the son of a veterinarian means you're biased as fuck. It's not an argument in your favor.
I won't deny that spaying and neutering has had a positive effect on the numbers of dogs and cats that die in shelters in USA, but it doesn't solve the problem of shitty owners that let their dogs roam, pet hoarders, backyard breeders that farm dogs for pet stores and so on. I worry that it's going to reduce the genetic pool of many old rare breeds to the point where a hidden disease may affect the entire breed population. I also worry that in another 100 years, every fucking dog in USA will be a pitbull since those are the only ones that stay intact in ghettos and suburbs across the country.
>>556494263 >Disregard how fun it is to suck animal cock and fuck animal holes. Disregard how hot it is to slide a big hard dog cock into a fertile dog pussy...even if you use a condom on him. Disregard the joy of having an entire litter of puppies licking you. Are you... trying to imply you are impregnanting the dog? Because that's what it reads like you are trying to imply.
>>556495289 >Besides, being the son of a veterinarian means you're biased as fuck. It's not an argument in your favor. You are under the impression my mother supports neutering. Or that all veterinarians support neutering. That speaks more about yourself than it does about me, for the fact I am a veterinarian son brings the fact I live this studies, I read about this diseases, I am expose 24/7 to the whole discussion. If you bring me a study with flaws, you are going to get your ass handed to you because it only goes to show you are looking for evidence for an a priori conclusion.
And the comparison to the anti-vaccine movement is derived from that: they used bad studies, bad science, a lot of noise, and nothing else to support their points. They idiotically crash into the mainstream knowledge with statements that are disproven by anyone that bothers to read a bit into their claims, which only hurts their position and makes a solution to a real problem disappear under a ton of stupid discussion. Should you neuter your pets? That's really up to you, and the evidence for the benefits of late-term ones is one that is at the very least consistent, if nor conclusive due to the same issues that studies has.
They are the anti-vaccine movement because all they are doing is shooting themselves in the foot by not pointing to something provable (it should be a personal decision and it doesn't do much to control populations that better animal control/more concious owners wouldn't) and going full retard (neutering them at any point causes them to become cancer ridden cripples).
Also >>556495643 >So if the prevalence of many diseases doesn't change whether a pet is neutered or not... Then that's not exactly a point in favor of neutering, because it doesn't prove neutering HELPS. No, because none of the conditions described are what neutering is used against you massive idiotic faggot.
Things that are sexy >girl getting pleasured by human penis >girl getting pleasured by a dildo >girl getting pleasured by tentacles >girl getting pleasured by a dog >girl getting fucked by her own self
Things that are not sexy >Human male getting pleasured by a human penis >Horse getting pleasured by a human penis >Goat getting pleasured by a human penis >Dolphin getting pleasured by a human penis
what makes bestiality sexy is the girl being the receiver of enjoyment (or by giving, and therefore still receiving in a way).
it is not sexy at all to see an animal receive pleasure because... its an animal. If that excites you, there is something wrong with your brain.
>>556496678 While true, one has to remember that pit bulls are small dogs. One has to put her knees very wide apart and keep her vag very low to the ground for a pit bull to enter her properly. You see vids of dogs trying to jump up to reach all the time. They're all doing it wrong. The vag should be the same height as the dogs dick.
At least peeps here realize you can't get preggers and you can't get the animal preggers. Also, there's VERY few STDs that cross over from dog to human. Add to that the fact that a dogs temperature is a bit higher than a humans means the dick feels hot. Plus, knotting creates a seal so the cum cannot escape. And dogs dump a ton of cum. So she feels not just the dog swelling up, but also getting filled with hot cum. This is why some women can have orgasm after orgasm with a dog. Just about every woman who has been knotted ends up preferring a dog over a bf.
>>556497745 theres an element of degradation but its also just.... its hot to see things make girls get off. people have invented a jillion ways to get a girl off, but it still centers around the girl, and the thing the girl is using.
>>556499058 Rule 34. Having a fetish does not make one mentally ill. Letting a fetish adversely affect the way you live your life is mentally ill. According to the DSM, letting ANYTHING adversely affect the way you live can be considered a mental illness.
>>556499784 I totally saw a video about a guy who rubs his dick against cars until he cums. He kisses the cars and moans while waxing them, too.
Weird as fuck, but what do I care? Everybody should find their happiness and pursue it, regardless of what closeminded fucks like you insist is 'normal'. You have fun trying to control what people do with their lives, dude. I'mma fuck dogs.
>>556500779 Nope, you're not alone. As the internet grew more popular and bestiality got more and more popular the governments were forced to introduce new laws banning sex with animals. It doesn't stop anyone from doing it but you have to be more careful about hiding your identity now so the supply of porn has almost dried up completely :(
>>556497581 "if you don't match my exact desires, you are mentally damaged". Eat a bullet <3
>>556497745 If I want to degrade a woman, I'll piss down her throat. Fucking dogs is only degrading for women who don't ENJOY it...and i'm not taking the risk of introducing a dog I love to a woman who I can't trust not to nark on me.
Then again, girls who don't get off on dog cock really aren't worth dating.
>>556500178 well yes, some people get off to jamming needles into their dicks too. none of these people are mentally sound.
>>556500268 >literally hundreds and where are you coming up with that figure. if you go onto any beast boards where you could actually come up with a figure, you'd find the number of dudes-fucking-animals very very very very very small compared to girls-fucked-by-animals
>>556500382 not gonna argue that. fetishes are 99.99999% associated with human. not just inanimate objects
>>556500428 are you really trying to say that cuz one dude could rub his dick on cars and get off, that its normal? mfw
As far as i can tell, the production of it has moved away from payed to just community. like a person on one of the beast forums will post a pic set/vid of her with her dog. but shes not selling it, its just a group of people willing to share with the group.
>>556489472 I remember the ridiculous looks and arguments I got from a series of vets when I tried to find anyone who would be willing to at least consider giving my cats a vasectomy instead of a neutering.
I know it's done sometimes for cat breeders to have a vasectomied tom cat around to hump the gals when it's not time for breeding, but try and get it done just as an average, caring pet owner that doesn't want to cut off a perfectly healthy set of organs and you're looney.
And I'm not even a zoophile or anything, I was just trying not to be cruel to the animal I love.
>>556501603 >>556501229 Yeah. I mean I've read enough studies from psychologists who study zoophiles, and zoologists and veterinarians who study animal sexual behavior, to see something: The educated professionals, the scientists and medical experts of the world, understand that animals are highly sexual and clearly ENJOY sex with humans.
The problem is the loud, ignorant masses who, just like with homosexuality, feel like it's their business to demand laws governing how a man uses his penis.
And if you're a scientist or a veterinarian, do YOU want to risk losing your high paying career by telling the closed minded, kneejerk public that having sex with animals is okay? Of course not. The nation would scream for your blood and you'd be removed just so your organization can save face (and funding) with the public.
The public doesn't actually UNDERSTAND the issues. Most pet owners are terribly neglectful (leaving dogs chained outside or in kennels for inhumane amounts of time) but they don't CARE about actually understanding the animal. It's all about what they find "icky" and their ability to enforce their ideals on other people.
>>556503028 In a way, though, he's right to be skeptical of you. Average pet owners don't give a flying fuck about their pet's sexual needs--hell, most don't even realize pets HAVE sexual needs--so it's immediately suspect when a person shows that much concern over their animal's genitalia.
>>556503884 Denmark is probably the only shining example of scientific integrity, where the advisory board actually recommended against banning bestiality, their reasoning being that in most cases it doesn't hurt the animal and can even be beneficial to the animals well being. The opposition is becoming more and more vocal and rabid though, I wonder if it can last.
>>556502690 See, this is the kind of bullshit involve in the animals studies: people don't know how to read data, but go making claims about.
That doesn't show that. It shows there is more interest by the male animal lovers, but not their number. There are forums with thousands of threads and thousands of posts, but they are literally just two, three guys talking to each other. So number of threads proves nothing.
>>556503884 See, you keep saying studies, but I think we already covered the fact you don't know what you are reading and any time you make that claim it can be firmly placed in "I truly wish upon a star!".
>>556504540 Hopefully, mostly because banning stuff rarely eliminates it, just makes it more violent or opportunistic.
>>556503884 I guess I could understand if it were a dog, but it was a male cat.
I don't know, I feel like an alien or someone from an alternate timeline or something. You don't needlessly mutilate something you claim to love for your own convenience. It seems pretty basic.
The fact that a medical professional that's devoted to helping animals would have to reach for a reason, other than caring for it, I might not want my cat desexed without an legitimate medical reason just seems so bizarre to me.
I didn't want kids, so I got a vasectomy, I didn't have myself castrated.
>>556504804 I don't know how you didn't see from that study that neutering was only questionably beneficial at best, and early neutering (as is common in the US) was clearly more harmful than later/no neutering.
But hey, you probably gained some magical ability from daddy to read the exact opposite as everybody else when you look at a document, so who are we to question? :^)
>>556504804 I have to go to work so I can't stay much longer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia#Extent_of_occurrence
Is THAT better? It shows almost the same proportion of males/females. And 8% of men is a pretty huge number. That's like 1 of every 12 people. Hell, with those numbers most likely everyone has a male friend that's at least zoo curious.
>>556505319 Most STDs aren't transferrable from dogs to humans. What's far more likely is a human-only STD surviving for a short period inside of a dog's body and passing on to a new host. So... don't fuck a dog that somebody else has fucked recently?
Of course if sex with animals was legal, zoophiles wouldn't have to be afraid to take their pets to veterinarians to ask for medical counseling and we'd have more definitive answers available to the public.
>>556507202 >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia#Extent_of_occurrence The Kinsey reports rated the percentage of people who had sexual interaction with animals at some point in their lives as 8% for men and 3.6% for women, and claimed it was 40–50% in people living near farms, but some later writers dispute the figures, because the study lacked a random sample in that it included a disproportional amount of prisoners, causing sampling bias. Martin Duberman has written that it is difficult to get a random sample in sexual research, and that even when Paul Gebhard, Kinsey's research successor, removed prison samples from the figures, he found the figures were not significantly changed.
By 1974, the farm population in the USA had declined by 80 percent compared to 1940, reducing the opportunity to live with animals; Hunt's 1974 study suggests that these demographic changes led to a significant change in reported occurrences of bestiality. The percentage of males who reported sexual interactions with animals in 1974 was 4.9% (1948: 8.3%), and in females in 1974 was 1.9% (1953: 3.6%). Miletski believes this is not due to a reduction in interest but merely a reduction in opportunity.
>>556507769 Dude. you are just talking about the horniness of a guy. If you buy a fleshlight and fuck it, that doesnt translate into you watching videos of fleshlights getting fucked and you getting off to pictures of fleshlights.
men are horny and they will fuck things to get off, no one is arguing that. what I *am* arguing is that you posting a pic of a dog's pussy is going to appeal to far, FAR less people than a woman getting fucked by a dog. because there is a goddamn woman involved. how is that so hard to understand. you are the one not listening.
>>556505887 There are more zoophiles than homosexuals, yes, and yes that does provide as evidence. It's not completely empirical (kinsey's studies have been critiqued and countered many, many times) but it does prove the point in an statistically significant manner, with a large data pool, and consistent standard for the acquisition of this information.
See, /b/, it's not bloody hard not looking like an ignorant idiot.
>>556505734 Because of the reasons stated: the pool size was too small, the pool sizes were not equivalent in sizes, the pools were weighted differently, the statistical significance of many of the results entered into the real of the error of their type of statistical analysis, etc., etc., etc. It's a bad study and your inability to see that makes you forfeit your right to claim you understand any study at all, in addition of being better for the movement you support that you shut up before people start connecting your opinion with your bullshitting.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.