Question: If a character is over 300 years old, and has an undeveloped female child's body, are they still a loli?
It's technically only illegal in Canada but countries like Australia will still fuck you over for it.
The difference between this and child porn is that this is drawn, no actual children are harmed making this. While some pedophiles will use loli as a release because real childporn is too risking, the majority of people I know who masturbate to loli have no real world attraction to kids, like me. I have no desires to fuck actual children. I think they are disgusting, underdeveloped, and annoying. But lolis are made to be just developed enough and to be sexually active. It's a fantasy, brah.
do all lolis have to be flat chested?
I like boobie lolis, but they haft to be super big or super small. No middle.
let me help
It's not illegal in the direct literal sense of not being against the law. Freedom of speech and artistic expression. Loli does not harm anyone. I mean, it's terrible that you can't tell the difference between ink and pixels and flesh and blood, or between a child with all the emotional and mental development of a potato and the idealized fictional innocence and youthful beauty. But since most people aren't retarded in that way, it's all good. Someone who has a libido fixated on these features is far better served in our society by getting off to the wonderful girls of Rustle stroking their jimmies than trying to find it in the real world. And after a little enjoyment of loli, one looks at real children and realizes they aren't what they're looking for. The fictional ideal is, and it is merely a fantasy which cannot be injured, harmed, or traumatized.
Loli porn prevents child abuse through redirection and rehabilitation.
says the guy lurking in the loli thread because he can't get enough of it.
Google Search By Image Plugin:
and you read playboy just for the articles, and never look at the pictures.