trying not to post stuff thats been posted a thousand times before
nothing like some good oc to lead a good creep thread
>doing gods word
fuck auto correct
Dude, how'd you get that close? I'd lose my shit, I'm too chicken shit
What phone? Anyone notice
>gotta get dem A's mayne
just held it while waiting in line
just held it? covered the screen, like no special app? I'm trying to get on this level help an anon out
I've been reading to use an app that hides the camera or stick the phone in your pocket but just leave the corner of your camera out..but its all shaky to hell
and can someone explain into webm
Why isn't there fucking GUI for tards like me that just want a button that does pic/gif/video = webm (little loss)
held it like i was just holding it regularly
no app. no one behind me so i wasn't worried
this one was scary
wow....were you under a desk or something? that's ballsy but oh so righteous.
I have a friend that has a god-like gallery of his creeping expeditions. I've only been privileged to see but a few but he has HUNDREDS of upskirting and yoga pants creeping videos. He's quite skilled at is too, I haven't seen work better than his. He has a collection of microSD cards that are filled entirely of the forementioned. At some points he actually creeps me out from it, some rich over-privileged white boy who thinks he can do whatever, and he's doing it.
Tl:dr if my friend was ever caught with what he had I would never see him again.
Do you ever look in the mirror at night, when you are all alone and can't get sleep, and ask yourself
"what am I doing with my life"
I find furries of a lesser evil than these 'but it's not rape' fuckheads.
1. Too poor, couldn't afford a phone good enough to capture good enough video
2. Too chicken-shit to actually try it, watching from a distance and remembering later is one thing but getting up close is crazy to me. Kudos to those that actually do though, pretty ballsy
congratulations? still disgusting.
close enough. you might as well whip your dick out and rub it up against her. which im sure is your next idea.
>What do you do here?
these creeper guys are just as bad as ragheads/sandniggers.
Both impose their own morals on how a woman should look upon others. Using self-excuses like ' she deserved it' , 'it was her choice to look so slutty' , 'she could have avoided it if she wore more clothes' , 'she should have covered herself more'
See the parallels?
The effect is the similar: forcing women to wear only what is deemed decent.
> what it feels like to be violated like that
you mean tenderly loved
jfc.. read: >>560160919
>>using 'law' as an excuse
>If you call me being sexually attractive to females
>me being sexually attractive to females
>sexually attractive to females
Um I think that's the last you are to females otherwise you wouldn't resort to such drastic measures to take one semi blurry pic of their butt.
I know some women who have had their pictures unwillingly taken and published online. Yes, some of them feel raped. All of them feel very very bad about it.
ugly women hates good looking women and try to impose their morals on the good looking women.
They are trying to hinder the attractive girls from showing how attractive they are.
changing booths that have cameras have to explicitly state that they have cameras
also, do those cameras record images so that they can be shared on the internet so that creepos can fap to them? No.
This is on par with arguing with a pedo who claims that a 9 year old has the ability to consent to sex.
deal with the fact that this isn't your hugbox and people will post creep-webm wether you like it or not, and you can't do anything about it. i'm actually thinking of starting to do it cause of you.
>but still part of the problem.
part of what problem? i fucking love girls dressing like they want, and the fact that someone films them makes the moment eternal
the only hate i see is from the guy degrading women by using them as objects for your sexual fantasies.
maybe if you weren't socially retarded you'd be able to talk to women, but instead you creep around taking photos from afar.
>the only hate i see is from the guy degrading women by using them as objects for your sexual fantasies.
the only one hating here is you.
>maybe if you weren't socially retarded you'd be able to talk to women, but instead you creep around taking photos from afar.
just look at all that hate, your life gotta suck, being so hateful all the time instead of doing things you like, like taking creepshots, women do it all the time with male singers.
>the only hate i see is from the guy degrading women by using them as objects for your sexual fantasies.
>only men have sexual fantasies
>not a single woman have shlicked to guy from twilight or bieber.
you are infact delusional and everyone can tell, except you.
yeah i wouldn't bother to take pics myself, but these bitches are going out everyday with their titties and asses hanging out, some have their pussies visible to anyone who looks at it on the street. it's not like they wouldn't have seen it anyways they just recorded it. don't sit there and pretend that these "women" don't look in the mirror know that they are sexualizing themselves with the revealing clothes they're wearing and then go out anyways to feel attractive. now it's men's faults for having emotions and eyes? no one is fucking raping them, taking a video or photo isn't hurting them.
when a girl is wearing a tiny string of underwear and see-through/skin tight/super thin pants which where designed as underwear (that's what leggings are undergarments), then pull them up their pussy so far you can make out her camel toe asshole is flush against the pants. and somehow that's a guys fault for noticing? i'm sexualizing her? not she sexualizing the fact that she is socially in trend to show strangers her underage pussy, but guys are the issue.
with no bra or push up bras squeezing dem titties up and out of shirts. when a slight wind shows nipple, guys are wrong for noticing. fuck i guess we should all be blind and stupid so we don't offend the women. it's not like i'm some asshole who's bothering them in any way or even one of the anons photographing them. but i'll be damned if i can't stare at what you're showing me. if they don't like the attention they can cover the fuck up. it's not irrational it's just fucking logical.
when i have a mowhawk or i have visible tattoos and piercings, i know i'm not a bad person but i'm not surprised or offended when store owners don't trust me and old ladies shy away. if i have a : fuck you!, shirt on i don't cry because people are rude to me.
>i know i'm not a bad person but i'm not surprised or offended when store owners don't trust me and old ladies shy away
>if i have a : fuck you!, shirt on i don't cry because people are rude to me.
16 year old detected.
not at all, that's just your idiot defense.
i'm not saying for them to cover up i'm not telling them what they should or shouldn't do. i want them to keep walking around showing me their ass and tits. i'm stating it's in no way wrong for a man to stare at what is freely been given to him. it's not even illegal to photograph in public. because that's all this is. now if you set up a camera in a private stall them yeah that's illegal for various reasons. but that's not what i'm saying at all, i'm saying it's trendy to dress in all honestly in a slutty fashion. fucking awesome, for me.
and saying i'm a virgin or pervert or prude would be incorrect, i'm none of these. if you can see a persons privates in public because of the skimpiness of the clothes that's pretty slutty. i'm also not saying they're sluts, just saying they're dressed in a slut fashion.
it's not like it's the first time this type of thing has occurred modernly, fashion comes in waves. so i'm going to ride this to it's fullest. it's not my daughter who's 14 and in a loose top with no bra and titties hanging out, as well as shorts so small and tight half her ass is out of them and her pussy is camel toeing so hard i can almost see a clit.
it's an example not something i actually do, but wouldn't that make sense?
if i know i'm acting in a shocking manner, why would i expect anything else?
these girls leave the house trying to look attractive and when men notice they get scorned
anyone got creep fails? like the girl finding out, her getting mad, stuff like that
I never said anything about posting pictures online, but taking pictures and looking are 100% equivalent.
The debate about what people put online regarding other people is completely separate, and there's far more to it than posting some creep shops. If you don't see that you're blind.
Fucking neckbeards and their creeping.
A few years ago I found one of you fat fucks tyring to take an upskirt pic of my gf and I beat the fuck out of him.
So be warned the next time you creep on a girl her boyfriend might be close and he will beat the ever loving fuck out of your cheeto encrusted face ya fucking creeps
YEah, I use an app for Android called "Good camera" (pic related, oc I got using the app), and it does have the option to put on a black screen. However, the shutter kinda sucks and so a lot of pics turn out blurry. Anyone know any better apps?
here is some I took with it
Thanks, I'll try it out.
Also more OC.
Btw, these were from my normal camera. Was with a friend with similar interests.
By which publisher? A couple came up with that name.
It's always nice to stumble upon one of these threads.
>dem child bearing hips
wish I had moar
Beach shower creepshots are my favourites.
That's actually interesting, you're right it's a bit hard to estimate her age from those pics. I guess she was between 25 and 30 for what I saw when I took them, but the pics don't help much.
What country is that?
I'm curious about where do they have that kind of "beaches".
Sorry, I was talking about it being all rocks, no sand, not about nudist beaches. These are everywhere, there are 3 just on my city.
See >>560182516, >>560182562
yea man sorry, first and foremost I was holding it sideways to not seem sketchy and I aready converted them to mute webms when I tried to rotate them and my video editing program said there was a bitrate error every time I tried to rotate one so I said fuck it and posted them like this
also, these were all taken on the same day, more or less the same place, and in the span of like 25 minutes. Everything you saw me post was from my first ever attempts at creeping. I'll get better
>I know some women who have had their pictures unwillingly taken and published online. Yes, some of them feel raped. All of them feel very very bad about it.
That sounds like these hysterical women who claim to get PTSD from twitter.
Nobody takes them seriously of course but it still devalues the experience of real victims.
implying they are not real victims. get your head out of your ass
>my first ever attempts at creeping. I'll get better
how about you stop altogether and leave these women alone.
Like it. I have some I saved, too.
Public space means no expectations of privacy. It's perfectly legal and fine, and if you don't want pics of you wearing something, don't wear it, or don't go to a public place with it.
Now ignoring your trollbait.
Not to mention the double moral of bitches on this.
They LOVE those fucking gossip shit with pics taken exactly like this, but of famous people. That's fine, legal, and "their right of getting informed" (like a famous magazine said).
But when they are the ones on a pic, they scream bloody hell. Well, /b/ also has free speech rights, bitch.
Will always do, my friend. You can count on us!
>implying they are not real victims.
Thats exactly what Im implying.
Since they chose to go online and continually read those messages, they obviously weren't very traumatizing.
But even if it was possible to be victimized via twitter or facebook, its unhelpful to compare that to people with PTSD.
Real PTSD from a war can include things like flashbacks which can make the person who suffers from it dangerous. They might flash back to a time when they had to do violent terrible things. Or suffer violent terrible things being done to them.
This is somebody who is strong, healthy, fit and able to use weaponry.
There is no danger from an obese feminazi who had to read mean words written about her. Feminazis are completely ineffectual in the real world.
Its easiest just to ignore them.
Women already have enough problems walking down public streets without having to worry about suddenly becoming pornography. They must already deal with being leered at, cat-called, sexually harassed, groped and sometimes attacked. Given the enormous number of women with histories of sexual violence, and the many more who fear it every day, is it really that hard to imagine that they might have legitimate reasons to not want their pictures on creepy web forums? Has it occurred to these guys that women are people, and not just images for them to get off to?
Cameras have consequences, especially when those pictures end up published online. This can happen at a protest, a party, or simply walking down the street, and it can put people at risk in a thousand different ways. Generally, those publishing pictures have little to do with these risks, and might never learn that somebody’s been stalked, attacked or worse as a result of their actions. If you have a camera and publish things online, it is your responsibility, not the subject’s, to make sure things are safe, kosher and consensual.
>Given the enormous number of women with histories of sexual violence
>Has a history of being sexually violent
>Complains when someone takes a photograph of them.
Sure, they are special flowers that deserve to live in a box of cotton, protected from real life, because they are the only ones who suffer, and have it worse than everyone else.
Or maybe not.
Maybe they have much more privileges and options than men. Men can't just don't study or work, marry someone, and stay at home without working at all while their partner pays for everything, even for an assistant so you don't even have to work at home. I don't see many women working on road construction, or on mines, or on anything that isn't retail bullshit. I don't see them having to pay to a guy because they had a child together and decided not to keep it: she can just give it in adoption and forget about it if she chooses so, but men don't have that privilege.
If a drunk woman has sex with a guy, she couldn't consent and it's rape. If a drunk man has sex with a woman, and she gets pregnant, he can't say he didn't consent, and he is going to get robbed by the legal system.
So, have you feminazis though that men can have it worse than you? They are people, and not just bank accounts to get off to.
It still amazes me to see men's rights activists claiming that men have it worse. Omg the ridiculousness of your statements make my head hurt. Goodbye pig, I feel sorry for any woman that ends up marrying you. Which I doubt because I doubt you know many females to understand how they feel.
I'm really amazed at femishit's ability to skip all arguments and points people make at them, then get mad, and walk away triumphant like if they made some sense.
Really, remembers me of that pic of playing cheese against a pigeon.
Good luck growing some brain.
Sorry, English is my 3rd language, and I sometimes have some trouble with very similar words. I noticed my mistake after posting, but it was too late.
Please, don't make such a big deal of it. Everyone will understand it anyway.