i posted a thread just now about this, asking how the towers could have vertically collapsed if they were struck near the top. doesnt make sense if you consider basic physics and whatnot.
like, towers are solid structures. how did something which struck closer to the top then the bottom, somehow cause complete vertical collapse as if the base had been destroyed.
it seems like the damage was not in the right place for the behavior of the collapse.
come on man just answer me i dont see how that is a dumb question
>super strong structure
>damage close to the top
>total collapse of building, almost level to the ground
just doesn't add up to me
see look at the damage to the right tower.
next post will have gif of collapse
Anon we're making fun of 9/11 here, Please, be gone with thou logic
I'm pretty sure you should provide a citation or get the fuck out.
"A lot of scientists say" is no more valid than "a lot of priests say" unless you, personally, know what the fuck you're talking about.
I'm also pretty sure you don't understand friction, kinetic energy, or jet fuel.
I kinda agree. I don't think it was an inside job or explosives but that is odd. The problem with the fuel melting the steel is that all the fuel was burned up in the fire explosion.
The narrative that they were choosing how to die is tricky. I think many on the north tower I can see doing that...but the south tower a whole other story. People were jumping the second the second plane hit.
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/911-conspiracy-debate-part-ii/ Part 2
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/911-conspiracy-debate-part-iii/ Part 3
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/911-conspiracy-debate-part-iv/ Part 4
honestly, the elitist hate mongering that goes on on this board
you just like seeming like you're better than me
I get that people say the impact itself and not the burn is what caused the fall. I'm reading here what a debunker wrote that makes sense.
Just...I can't comprehend now why being hateful to people makes you happy...
>build toy tower
>punch it in upper middle
>either it breaks top half or entire thing falls over side ways.
It does not just fall directly on top of it self at almost terminal velocity
I called you out on your unsourced bullshit.
You shat out a bunch of emotional drivel about your feelings.
If you're too sensitive to handle being called out when you're asserting stupid shit, you should leave 4chan, and the internet, forever.
just, chill out man is all im saying
i know you like that little feeling you get from being right but in real life those people are called pricks and nobody likes them. there's a reason. so, just because you can do it on the internet and not face real human responses does not mean it probably doesn't have side effects.
>you just like seeming like you're better than me
>seeming like you're better than me
>you're better than me
yeah you're right anon
This doesn't have anything to do with religion...
Anyway if you do actually believe that just a plane took down a tower then explain how World Trade Center building #7 collapsed the same day when no plane hit it and all it had was small isolated fires
I just don't understand how not one, but two towers could collapse.
Both were made to withstand hurricane force winds.
This question is in every single 9/11 thread.
It wasn't knocked down like a Jenga tower. It was hit, it caught on fire, it burned for a while, it got so hot that the steel structure became malleable enough for it to collapse, and the downward force of the collapse caused a chain reaction for the rest of the building to fall down.
Can we just move on from 9/11 like the japs did
Why, Mr. Anderson? Why, why? Why do you do it? Why, why get up? Why keep fighting? Do you believe you're fighting... for something? For more than your survival? Can you tell me what it is? Do you even know? Is it freedom? Or truth? Perhaps peace? Could it be for love? Illusions, Mr. Anderson. Vagaries of perception. Temporary constructs of a feeble human intellect trying desperately to justify an existence that is without meaning or purpose. And all of them as artificial as the Matrix itself, although... only a human mind could invent something as insipid as love. You must be able to see it, Mr. Anderson. You must know it by now. You can't win. It's pointless to keep fighting. Why, Mr. Anderson? Why? Why do you persist?
Yes, I am reading this now.
Apparently heat expansion caused the buckle in the structure pictured which resulted in uneven distribution of weight which made the whole thing collapse.
I suppose that does make sense.
Just, fuck the superiority complex havin' pricks who touch their dicks to having their facts straight. You can tell they get personal emotional power from making fun of people they judge to be....well any number of things.
That is weirder and nastier than being ignorant of a matter.
Anyone care to explain the molten steel found on the site?
Jet fuel burns at 800º to 1500ºF.
It's like like the steel and iron needed to melt, just become malleable enough to bend under immense weight. The frame is supporting a huge portion of the building's weight, so it has to collapse at some temperature and pressure.
I'm not an expert, but I have taken physics.
I've never really questioned that the planes didn't take out the sky scrappers.
I guess it has always made sense to me.
The building materials and jet fuel were enough combustable fuel to get it that hot in the one part of the building.
The heat would not need to be applied to the entire structure. Just one area was enough to set the weight distribution off to collapse the tower.
see the image
I just dunno. I have a hard time buying into the whole weakened structure thing.
Sorry I sound like a conspiracy faggot.
Just don't see how an enclosed fire could produce the heat needed.