Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network issues. Refreshing the page usually helps. The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact. You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random
>>572926487 Hahahaha. And u know this from the abundance of sources over there in fairy tale no nigger land? U probably know ONE nigger. And they don't even have their nigger homies to impress. So they keep it hidden from the neo nazis who would string em up. Know what?? I am thinking u be's a negroid aintcha boy?? Or u just wanna suck theys dick so bad. U nigger lover. I should Murican histry x ur faggot nigger loving ass on the curb.
>>572928712 Guess what: culture is also hereditary to a certain extent, not only race. So if you have blacks behaving like niggers in a certain place, their children will do the same if there's no external influence.
But this pic talks about USA, where there is external influence - in the opposite way: in USA, you're pressed to behave accordingly to your heritage.
So, say, if you're "Irish"-American, you should behave differently from "Italian"-Americans, "German"-Americans... ...and if you're "African"-American, you're "suggested" to behave accordingly to the common "African"-American culture - like a nigger.
>>572929114 >weeded out >killed by pissed of nigger when welfare gets cut Same thing. You can't deny that black culture perpetuates stupidity and violence as something to look up to. Sure racism is wrong, and not all black people are niggers. But racism still exists because there must be some truth behind the stereotypes.
>>572929654 stop making excuses for them that's all anyone does. if they truly cared they have had plenty of time to better themselves. if they cared they would take a long look in the mirror and fix it not to mention how easy it would be considering the world is handed to them. they love living like parasites and they need to be removed because they will only get worseworse
>>572928712 It's fun to cherry pick statistics when you don't have to analyze any of the causes or discrepancies between races.
>Niggers gon nig cuz they all criminals http://www.huffingtonpost.com/van-jones/are-blacks-a-criminal-rac_b_8398.html
Drug use is 11.1% among whites and 9.3% among niggers, yet niggers get arrested at double the rate. You could absolutely blame this on open air markets as niggers in the hood seem to have absolutely no sense of discretion. Still I think it's relevant to point out for the sake of arguing that niggers are by their very nature more prone to criminal activity.
Carrying a concealed weapon it's 17.9% for whites, and 15.2% for niggers. To be fair it does lean a little in the other direction when its gun possession at 5.5% for whites, and 6.5% for niggers. Still we're talking a 1% difference that still doesn't reach anywhere close to the majority.
For physical assaults the statistics are equally close at 32.5% for whites, and 36.5% for niggers. Still despite this nignogs are arrested at 3 times the rate.
Why the disparity? Well the way the pohleese man profiles does have a bit to do with it..
>>572930823 >cites afrocentrist black man and local news >actual statistics as seen here >>572931153 >make the shit you spout seem retarded also this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
>>572930823 you forget the part where they are 13% of the population anon redo your math and try again. whites also account for the most welfare receivers but break it down by race and it turns into 1 in 4 blacks receive welfare and 1 in 23 whites that was a few years ago though. I also wish I still had the picture where it showed tons of brown people being labeled white to scew the statistics if someone has it please post it
>>572930510 >stop making excuses for them that's all anyone does. I'm not making excuses. On the contrary. Race isn't something you can change... so when one says, "it's because of their race", you can't really blame them. It would be as silly as blaming a pigeon for shitting on your clothes.
On the other hand, since culture is something they can change (albeit it's hard as a fuck), you can put the whole blame into the niggers - because they didn't try enough to shift from their nigger culture to anything saner. With a bonus - you can simply point to a decent black person and say to the nigger, "why can't you behave like him, you bastard?".
>if they cared [...] It's less about caring and more about being forced to do so. Like USA did with German-speaking populations in the WW II times.
>>572930756 It's interesting to compare Chile and Paraguay in this picture, considering both have roughly the same ethnic composition... but one is Europeanized as fuck while the other keeps lots of the native culture.
>>572931153 No I wouldn't argue with the stats there, but I'm curious if the number is just arrested or convicted. It's just because at the bottom there it says..
>In 2012, 69.3 percent of all individuals arrested were white, 28.1 percent were black, and 2.6 percent were of other races.
I mean no fucking shit because whites are most of the national population. Still I'm just saying according to other studies on the rates whites can either exceed or have a similar rate in criminal behavior.
>>572931605 The sources are listed at the bottom there. It's not like the reporter just blurted out some numbers at the top of their head.
Ok.. what I am about to say is going to blow your white supremist mind. I am going to provide 100 percent proof that people of afican decent are superior in mental capabilities, using ACTUAL proof (never used by any white supremist ever) by DNA and genetics. Ok so as we know in pre history there were two human-like species, the Homo Sapiens and the Neanderthals. The Homo Sapiens were far more complex than the Neanderthals. There are actually test that people can take to see how much Neanderthalic DNA is in them, for people of African decent there is no Neanderthalic blood in them, for Non-African decent it is 1%-7%. This is actually proof where there are absolutely no variables that could sway the results.
Homo Sapien>Neanderthal African=0% Neanderthal= 100% Homo Sapien Non-African=1%-7% Neanderthal= 99%-93% Homo Sapien Therefore, African>Non-African
If you disagree than you probably non-african thus proving my point.
>>572931153 >Koko has a tested IQ between 70 and 95 I call this bullshit. She's really smart for a gorilla and has a decent enough grasp of language; but so does the average 6 years old child who, measured by adult standards, would have an IQ of 33 [at least by Terman].
Anyway, about the other pic: guess what: not only SS Africa has one of the shittiest cultures to ever exist in the modern world, but they also have lots of child sub-nutrition, that plays a huge role in the IQ.
>>572932502 Check what I said in >>572929654 about USA. Regardless of being adopted, the black child will still be seen the same by the American society and pressed to behave accordingly.
>>572932310 Per capita, an ethnicity making up 13% of the U.S. populus recieving 28% of the arrests is an insanely high number... It gets even worse when you start looking at the violent crime statistics breakdowns, and worse still for the inter-racial crime statistics... As for cherry picking, your first article did plenty in its sourcing and failure to take de facto per capita relativity into account. It is however not unexpected that black people are so over-represented in crime statistics as a lower average income usually has this effect. You can't just expect poor people to not commit crimes. Regardless of race, that's ridiculous...
>>572932541 The homo sapiens were not more complex than the neanderthals. Further, who else have neanderthal blood? Well, there's the eurasian racial cluster, including egyptians, arabs, jews, european whites, chinese, japanese, maori, inca, mayans... Actually every single high culture that has ever developed, unless you count the african 'high cultures' like Great Zimbabwe which were created by foreign influence.
Who else has neanderthal DNA? The Aborigines... Apparently, this DNA trace seem to have very little do do with anything at all...
>>572933314 The test on Koko was an estimate since Koko can not communicate with humans well enough to perform something like the WAIS-IV. It is indeed questionable and to some extent biased. However, the SS African tests are not. Also, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study Still very low IQs ON AVERAGE.
>>572930472 crazy thing is, you have no idea. Couple that with level of attention you get for being offensive as compared to understanding and open to new perspectives in these parts, you may as well spend your time shootin hoopz trying to actually argue in these piece of shit threads that are neither funny nor amusing!
>>572933551 Yeah I won't argue the per capita argument or the inter-racial crime stats. Still iirc black on black crime has been on the decline, while white on white crime has been holding steady. I can try to fetch a link to the study if need be, but point I was trying to make is that chimp outs have actually been declining and that if we removed said chimps from society our supposedly lovely white american would just chimp out on each other. We wouldn't be rid of niggers. We would just have white niggers.
Weak point I know, but I'm not well versed enough in criminology to really try to make a point beyond that. Like you said when it comes down to it broke people do criminal shit.
So what you're saying is, you're a 15 year old sjw coming on here trying to prove things through two species that we have evolved out of and while doing so you cannot even use proper grammar and blame it on your age.
It's been a few million years by evolutions standards meaning that if you looked at it logically the percentage of Neanderthal and homo-sapien has little to do with modern day intelligence. You would know this if you had graduated highschool and been taught about how nutrition and environment effects the human body.
Also your comment on "if you go against this you're non-African" that is a safety blanket so that if someone disputes your point you can just claim that they're racist or just butt hurt.
You should go to bed sweetie, you have school in the morning and you don't want to be tired.
>>572932232 Wrong...aboriginals are negroids and they sailed the pacific. Aboriginals got as far as south america 1,000s of yeas before mongoloids crossed the land bridge from asia to northern america. If Darwin truly said this, he wasn't privy to this knowledge during his time also...he was wrong about a lot of other shit. If you're going to be racist...at least do it right.
Let's assume you had a State called Sotaminne [SM]. It's exactly like Minnesota, except by two details: 1. African-Americans are viewed as productive members of the society, common folks and smart in general; and 2. German-Americans are viewed as a plague, too dumb to actually work and in general dangerous; people claim that neighbourhoods with "those dirty germs" quickly devolve into shitholes full of criminals, prostitution and drugs. "After all, they're Germs, how else would this shit behave?"
Now, let's imagine those children from Minnesota were adopted by Sotaminnean couples: 1. German-MN children adopted by German-SM couple; 2. German-MN children adopted by African-SM couple; 3. African-MN children adopted by African-SM couple; 4. African-MN children adopted by German-SM couple.
Now, my question is: how do you think those groups would score IQ-wise?
>>572934969 If we removed what you eloquently refer to as chimps, it would take say, a hundred years or so until white americans started suffering enough from the dysgenic progression that they'd have the same average IQ. Eurasians have been exposed to severe evolutionary stress historically compared to the africans and aborigines who have stayed in their natural habitats. Evolutionary stress is what drives the process forwards. Further, eurasians have been forced to evolve more co-operative ways to live since their habitats have required it, whereas blacks could just rape someone, beat someone up and still flourish. It's not a strange thought at all that there would be racial differences, especially not considering how the eurasians have pretty much made every single piece of progress in the history of mankind, bar from the nubians which were arguably also to some extent part of the eurasian racial cluster.
In the end race doesn't matter too much as it is only an indicative average, and dysgenics will fuck us all over soon anyway. Unless we start doing a modernized and actually working version of eugenics on ALL races soon dysgenics will mark the end of civilization.
>>572934436 >The test on Koko was an estimate since Koko can not communicate with humans well enough to perform something like the WAIS-IV. Wait, but isn't dominion over language one of the things tested on IQ?
>Still very low IQs ON AVERAGE. See >>572935624 , I think this example would be nice for the discussion.
>>572934610 Check demographic density and growth for Haiti and Dominican Republic over the colonization times.
>>572934801 >Image regarding African countries Their culture is below shit as I already said.
>does it seem plausible that watching black people on TV makes your adult IQ score, despite being raised white, drop by nearly 20 points on average? No idea. I have internet, why would I bother with TV?
>>572935370 Actually aboriginals never mastered longer sea travel. Some afro-centrists theorize that aboriginal small canoes would have at one point drifted to sea and been forced by current to south america. However, this is only backed by visual identifications of skulls, which depend on nutrition etc. It is a very shady theory overall, especially given aboriginals never actually mastered sea fare.
This is an example of australian aboriginal seacrafts.
>>572936268 Fair point, didn't the police ask Zimmerman not pursue him, though? I understand self-defense, but he was told to stop following, then he made an excuse about him walking out of his car to find an address for the police. To this day, it's up for the debate, however, guess what? He was still found innocent. He has to watch his back for the rest of his life, though.
>>572935624 But no groups of whites have as low IQs as blacks under any circumstances... That is the issue here. Cultural stereotypes, virtually nonexistent in minnesota that has almost no black inhabitants and where the black adopted children would quickly assimilate into the white mainstream and be treated by their adoptive parents as white, should not be able to lower a childs IQ score close to what to white people would be clinical retardation. Sure, it would have a minor impact, but still no. How do you explain that people in belarus have higher IQ scores? An extremely poor country.
>>572935671 Good...because that's bullshit although I wouldn;t be surprised with the attitudes of academia during that time. "White men created everything." lol, tell that to the chinese. Also, all the evidence suggests that ancient egyptians were negroids and timbuktu in west africa was in ancient times a center for mathematics, trade and science. so...wrong. I date a black girl because she's fucking hot and she's highly intelligent, even more so than me according to her performance on tests, not saying i don;t have the potential but i'd just rather be blue collar although i'd like to be a mechanical engineer. From my experience, it's not about being black because I know a lot of trashy white people. I like to think that everything works out in the end like in the movie gladiator...some are good for fighting, some for dying. here's a pic of her by the way.
>>572936029 >>572936680 Oops one more question. Why would the only notable exception in Africa be the Nubians? I would say Mali was a very notable commerce centered kingdom with magnificent architecture and other aspects I'm just too bored to google right now.
>>572936620 Aboriginals are negroids, negroids have been discovered as far as south america and on just about every inhabited island in the pacific. there are only three differentiating skulls belonging to homosapiens. that's the caucasoid, negroid, and mongoloid. clearly i'm privy to information you can't wiki. ;)
>>572936680 Well... Try to keep the racial slurs out. I do have black friends. Who also agree there are racial differences in averages... Of course, the huge individual differences make these averages pointless when it comes to judging individuals, but it does explain statistics when we're talking group sizes of say, 1000 people or more. And more than anything where we are born, raised and what we eat and our mental stimulus determines our behavior a lot. And given roles. But to deny that one of these factors would be an important factor is simply not correct. They all play a part.
>>572937253 >But no groups of whites have as low IQs as blacks under any circumstances... Stick to the thought experiment.
Assume German-Sotammineans' average IQ is noticeably lower than the average, and African-Sotammineans have an IQ of, like, 102.
And assume the Minnesotan children are exactly like in real life.
_How would the four groups I mentioned score?_
>Cultural stereotypes, virtually nonexistent in minnesota Because Minnesota is completely isolated of any influence from the rest of the United States. They have no contact with other Americans, they run their own media and never check American media... Nah.
Just because a certain population has few or no individuals from a certain group doesn't mean this population has no stereotype about them. (I can mention examples from my homeland... Russians are drunken bastards, Mexicans are lazy, Americans are dumb. And yet, we have no expressive immigration from those countries.)
>Sure, it would have a minor impact, but still no. Minor? Quantify it. How much?
>How do you explain that people in belarus have higher IQ scores? An extremely poor country. Did I, in any moment, talk about poorness? I'm talking about local culture and stereotypes. Not wealth.
>>572937671 Because mali was a direct result of arabian trade and cultural influx, whereas the nubians arguably established a kingdom before extensive contact with northern egypt (what we call the first egyptian dynasties today). Of course, it is somewhat unfair to say "uuuh you can't count a high culture that was born out of another", because most high cultures are. Except probably the vikings, and the mauris, and some cultures like that. But still.
>>572938098 Aboriginals are negroids yes. Negroids have not been confirmed in south america, and regarding the pacific islands you're wrong. The malaysian mainland, and the islands near india are populated by negroids, the rest of the pacific is polynesian. Polynesians are eurasians, closely related to the maori and distantly related to the mainland south east asians, who arrived on these islands quite recently by boats. The negroids in the west pacific/indian ocean arrived when these islands were either connected by land, short swims, or short canoe trips. The aboriginals, for instance, reached australia by land.
wow thats a really pretty face. I think there is something to be said for hybridization of the races. Hybrid vigour is a known concept in selective breeding.
I will need a wife from a variety of races to see how my genes mix best.
Why are we so afraid of engaging in the kind of scientific exploration that ACTUALLY EMBRACES OUR DIVERSITY. All the "anti-racism" SJWs are PREVENTING us from exploring a wonderful aspect of our human nature.
How are we ever to evolve if we cant honestly dialogue about the variance in our genetic code? Suppressing such exploration will only ever lead to genocidal outbursts of rightfully angry individuals...
>>572937780 >And you're saying that since blacks breed more than deeply catholic puerto ricans, Reread what I wrote - I wrote to check demographic growth and population.
And also consider this growth wasn't just natural, but also by France and Spain sending slaves to both.
Regardless of the ethnic composition of Haiti, of course the lands there would deplete faster than in Dominican Republic - due to the presence of more people consuming resources, duh.
[And remember that Haiti was ruled by a white people. If the Frenchmen desired a smaller population, they would simply cull some slave babies or, you know, stop importing. They didn't - why?]
>You keep bringing up culture, and then you reject it when it proves you wrong as with the transracial adoption study... Because culture is only passed by the parents, right? Society has zeeeeeeeeeero impact on the culture... sure. [That's why I posted that thought experiment in first place!]
>>572938552 I also have black friends, and no I definitely don't use phrases like "chimp out" irl. I'm only an asshole when I'm around you cunts. Thanks again for expanding on your point. You're very well read.
>>572931056 It's a good thing you nigger lovers do all you can for the po ol niggers. When one of them rapes your girlfriend, or kills your parents, you can testify on dey behalfs, cuz dey din do nuffins. You faggots make me sick.
>>572938663 >Stick to the thought experiment. But the Irish have been treated and viewed upon as niggers. The people of belarus have been a scourge forever. Same with the jews. My estimate is that in your thought experiment, the white children would score around the black average (102-ish in this thought experiment), due to the lack of racial stereotypes, racial segregation, and the fact that they are being raised 'black'. Do take into account that these children were raised in ... in the experiment black suburbs, in a very black state, with no racial minorities to hang out with or identify with.
Minnesota is a very isolated state with at the time barely any racial minority. This was before widespread internet so the cleaned up mainstream TV and occasional movie was all these black kids could identify with other than the white upper middle class to ivy league neighborhoods they lived in. A single person of mexican heritage would quickly assimilate if there was no cultural pressure to stand out.
As for the IQ 'quantity', given the escalating point scale of IQ, the cultural impact should by rights not be able to cause what doctors would actually define as brain damage. A maximum deviation of five points would be my estimate, as this is the average deviation between different nations with similar racial compositions.
People from Belarus, or the Irish, or the Jews, have long been seen as retards, degenerates, violent, drunks, retarded, particularly the Irish have been treated even worse than blacks. Their IQ has not been significantly impacted by this...
>>572938098 >>572939404 >Aboriginals are negroids I hope you guys aren't implying "negroid" is monophyletic... Source of the picture, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929710003642
>>572940435 >>Stick to the thought experiment. >Proceeds to run away from the thought experiment. Come on, I'm asking something simple. Something as #>#>#>#, swap the octothorpes with the corresponding numbers.
Thread replies: 188 Thread images: 61
Thread DB ID: 16040
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at email@example.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.