Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network issues. Refreshing the page usually helps. The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact. You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random
>>580773586 Sure it is. It's the same drive, and the same kind of attraction, except instead of boobs, it's DFC. The target of what is percieved as sexy is just different, or is expanded. There's no logic behind it.
>>580774579 Children mainly want to have fun. In other words, they won't like penetrative sex, because that won't be fun at all for them.
As for fooling around, petting, whatever, if you make it fun, it's gonna be on the list of things they want. And depending on the age, sex drive develops anyways. Children experiment a lot among each other.
>>580774793 children dont find "petting" fun. it scares them. children looking at eachothers private parts isnt the same as having a grown man force them to touch his dick. id actually hate you perverts less if you just admitted youre sadistic cunts
>>580774851 those stories are crap. theyre created by paedophiles like yourself to try and make what youre doing not seem as destructive and evil as it is
>>580775201 >children looking at eachothers private parts isnt the same as having a grown man force them to touch his dick. If you use force, you're obviously doing it wrong, DUH. >children dont find "petting" fun. it scares them. No, children don't find being forced to do thing fun.
someone knows the name of a hentai where a girl followed a man who sexually abused her for ice cream? in the hentai there are 3 girls i think and they are at a spa or something to relax. when they go to sleep they get bad dreams where they were raped or molested like the girl i explained above
(Note: Fantasy. Not reality. Some of us can tell the difference.)
My lolis love me. My lolis need me. I protect them from a fightful cruel world.
(The frightful cruel world is pretty real. And our society betrays real children in ways far worse than lolicon. Perhaps if you're so concerned about childrens affairs you can look at real issues, such as administrative abuse, suppression of bully victims and human trafficking.)
>>580775526 you are all giving examples of children being FORCED to do it, what i one wants it for his own? what if one is just curious? If i dont ever find a little girl that wants to have a sexual thing thats ok, i wont rape her, i wont force her to do anything, i wont insinuate to her, BUT there are other people that cant controll thenmselves and rape them, that is wrong
>>580775526 You have a right to think what you believe anon.
Many of us know that what we like is illegal but nothing more than that. Society's norms have made everyone aware that it is "wrong" and "evil" but you go back a thousand years and tell some concuerer that his love for young children is wrong and I'm quite sure you would either be laughed out of the room or have your head cut off.
But it's not like we can say "oh this is illgegal and wrong, I should stop liking what I find appealing because it is not accepted"
Well if it isn't this thread again! You must be so proud of yourself. I bet you're giggling while stroking that food filled neckbeard of yours, you fucking faggot!. You must think you're the most alpha dog on 4chan, Huh?. Let me tell you something, while you're typing the captcha for your next shitpost, I'll be sampling the most beautiful women you won't even be able to dream about, You little fuck!. What's that?, did I rustle your jimmies?, What are you going to do? Huh?. Are you going to post the Navy Seals copypasta? Or are you going to post that cancerous banana picture again, because it's sooo funny?. Listen here you NEET, I don't care how strong your Paladin is, or how many headshots you have in Call of Duty, I will fuck you up!
>>580776221 >You can't fuck real women? More like don't want to. >You have to fuck little kids? Not even doing it. >I just don't get it. I don't get you, does that mean I claim there's something wrong with you? >You probably all got molested as kids. Nah.
>>580775947 if youre having sexual relations with a child you are forcing them no child can consent to sexual contact with an adult. and no im not referring to statutory rape or any of that shit. im referring to the simple fact children have not biologically or physiologically developed the desire to have sexual contact.
wanting to see a member of the opposite sex's private parts is not sexual curiosity, its general curiosity such as wanting to have the cookie your mother said you couldnt.
for you people to claim ignorance to this is making my blood boil
>>580775994 most adults arent scared when theyre having sex, if they are something is seriously wrong
>>580776032 im not referring to legalities or social norms. the fact is children do not want to have sex with adults. what the hell makes you think they do?
>>580775741 Speaking as a pedophile since age ~8, I found some girls to be highly receptive to sexual play from a young age, and aware of it being a taboo (and fun) thing to do. My experiences would not apply to all girls, but you would be surprised how many girls under 10 I got to "play" with when I was between the ages of 6 and 14, and how they understood that it was a fun and secret thing. I only had non-mutual sexual contact if they were sleeping, but it's hard to pass on licking the cunny of a sweet 10yo girl while she's in a deep deep sleep.
>>580776221 >You can't fuck real women? I had, I would equaly like women and little girls >You have to fuck little kids? I have never done it, if i dont ever do i dont care >You probably all got molested as kids. In fact i had a pretty good childhood
>>580776182 this fetish leads people to start looking for actual images of real children being abused. that desire leads to people actually raping children. so if you think its an innocent online fetish, it isnt
>>580776243 faggots are fucking other adults, they arent fucking up the lives of children you fucking idiot
>>580776486 Dude, sexual curiosity and sex play in kids are not even debated. Google child development and you'll find it on pretty much every damn post... Notes like this:
>Your preschooler might be very curious about bodies – her own and other people’s. She’ll try different roles and behaviour, and might play ‘doctors’ or ‘marriage’. This combination of natural curiosity and role-playing sometimes leads to childhood sex play >from http://raisingchildren.net.au/articles/child_development_four_to_five_years.html
>>580776883 >You like watching little kids get fucked and abused Cartoon girls. >but you don't do it in real life and you don't want to fuck grown women? Right. >Would you ever consider an intimate relationship with another adult? Define intimate. Sexual? Not interested. >>580776924 Ever since I started playing the games, I can't get into 2hu porn anymore.
males have a natural inclination to be attracted to girls at ages starting around 13. Many benifits in that the is part of our evolutionary adaptation, and these traits are seen in other parts of attraction standards that have been relativly stable through-out the oscillation of human society.
Liking pre-pubecents like most of the shit in this thread... eh... doesn't make much sense.. and honestly i don't.. regular loli? It's actually normal from a biological perspective... it's just the human functioning in our modern society makes the results of sexuality at that age counter-productive. This is because we must be in a 'child-like' mental state for a longer period of time to absorb the nurture required to survive; nurture that would not be necessary in society even a few centuries ago.
but hey... whatever... I don't really think "oh they're kids, that's hot" I think "holy shit it's so cute.. i wanna fuck her brains out." tl;dr: If you are a male and you don't like it.. .it's because of our current society (and not saying it shouldn't be that way). Search your heart....look deep... You actually think it's hot, i guarantee it.
>>580776221 1. I've fucked more "real" women than you've talked to. 2. I actually have kids, and would never touch any children in real life, kind of fucked up you'd think like that. 3. I know you don't get it, you have inner demons that are making you project evils and ignorance onto other people, seek help. 4. I really really wanted to get molested by this one hot baby sitter, but all she let me do is touch her tits a little bit.
Your explanation disregards volumes and years of peer reviewed scientific journals, theories, and investigations. Now who looks foolish?
>>580776729 I mean, I guess there's nothing illegal about watching cartoon kids get fucked...I don't get it or think its sexy...but I guess as long as you're not actually fucking little kids its not hurting anyone.
>>580777151 When I was a kid and enjoyed "sex play", I didn't stick to approaching other kids about it. I looked for it with adults as well. I'm happy they weren't as close minded as you, and I'm happy they weren't sadistic assholes, because not one of them took advantage of me or did anything to me that I didn't initiate and ask for.
Sorry dude, but there is such a thing as a "nice person" who can still play sexy games with someone underage without causing mental scarring. Personally I'm more into adult women, but I'm sure plenty other here are the kind of people I'm happy I met back then.
you really think your fetish leading to the rape of children is comparable to parents giving their child a good education to set them up for life?
giving them a strong faithful foundation so they grow up to be good people?
that they should trust people who are there to protect them and that their existence in society matters?
youre destructive attitude towards kids is on parr with a genuine desire to improve them?
please kill yourself
>>580777118 men get into these pictures, they start developing attractions to children. they then want to find images of real children being raped. they find those images. they then want to rape a child themselves. it happens every fucking day
>>580777118 exactly, if they dont want i wont even if they are naked in front of me if they dont wanto or understand it I wont fuck them, so I think there are little chances o fucking a child with this rules
>>580777151 >to call it sex play, like some sick psychologists like to call it is like calling a prostate exam sex play. Bollocks. I was highly aware from a young age that my "curiosity" for tiny hairless cunts was for sexual gratification. Took me a long time to work out how one goes about getting that gratification, but the thrill of touching and kissing and licking and pinching it was enought to get my heart racing. Now I masturbate to the memories of wonderful, mutual sexual experiences.
>>580777732 its the same thing. adults dont let children explore their curiosities if it hurts them. you coercing a child into letting you molest them is damaging, the same way letting a small child iron their school uniform is dangerous and damaging
>>580777883 Good, good let the butthurt flow through you. And while you get riled up enough to contemplate murder, the rest of us here feel nothing but love and affection from seeing these beautiful images, and wouldn't want to hurt a soul.
You are aware that the vast majority of child abuse is done by adults who does NOT have a sexual attraction to children, right? It's just rapists and assholes who sees an easy victim. People who genuinely like children aren't typically inclined to want to do them any harm.
>>580778054 ive spoken to a lot of paedophiles, i know a lot of paedophiles. theyre all like you. a lot of them started out looking at anime kiddie porn, moved on to the real thing, then developed attractions they couldnt contain.
most are just sick evil bastards who, like you, blame society and the victim for their actions.
are you all literally just little self-absorbed bitches who lack human empathy?
>>580777883 >youre full of fucking shit, or youre just some idiot whos allowed himself to be brainwashed into thinking he wanted to fuck adults. So you're saying you would invalidate the may positive sexual experiences children have? And you'd have them feel responsible when the person they shared a special and intimate part of their development with is punished for the privilege? And you'd have the child told that their positive experiences were bad and shameful, and that the child should feel bad and ashamed? You would deny children a way to learn about sexual behaviour with someone who cherishes them?
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at email@example.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.