So I found the most ridiculous fucking hashtag today /b/
and the slightly less popular
This very explicitly relates a woman's body and sexual preferences to a material product and is probably the most sexist thing I've seen in a long time. So what are we gonna do about it /b/? Let's dox these fuckers!
The part that that is literally sexist as fuck.
How can every anti-feminism thread be about belittling both women and their complaints about being belittled? It's either one or the other or you're being illogical.
would you rather open a soda yourself and enjoy a fresh drink or drink from one thats had 7 dicks in it ?
>hurr cmon guys lets dox people i dont agree with
fuck off OP
I am not belittling women because women and sluts are two different things. women save themselves for their future husband and sluts just go around being "hurr durr my point of view matters" when we all really know it doesn't. This is a man's world honey, get used to it.
>This very explicitly relates a woman's body and sexual preferences to a material product
Implying that virgin women aren't better and that the excuse of "sexual preferences" is sufficient enough to justify whore behavior
>probably the most sexist thing I've seen in a long time
It's reality. Virgin women are better than non-virgin women. The are more valuable, more innocent and more loving.
Men who have sex outside of marriage are wrong as well, but physiologically it is more damaging to the woman to have sex. Also women are mothers and thus God punishes them greater seeing as how they carry the children in the very place that they whored out.
A loser who gets no or little pussy.
That is the equivalent. And women go out of their way to state this.
There is nothing wrong with guys saying this, they can say and do what ever the fuck they want.
The only people who DO have a problem with this are women who use sex as a form of coinage and control in relationships or have been around the block and know they have no chance if it comes down to having fewer partners thus having a lower chance of being unfaithful and being a future ex-wife.
Oh and fellas. If the woman you're with is loudly and visibly pissed at this then begin to count down the days till she cheats on you or wants a break.
>OP's face while making this shit thread
I don't understand what is inherently wrong with a woman having sex with two men, and then birthing the second's child. The first penis has not done any damage to the woman, in fact penises and vaginas are literally made to interface.
But I really really really like this image.
Maybe if you weren't arrogant and defending whorish behavior then people would scold you. You're a fool and your lack of self-awareness is why you are miserable.
Men cannot be whores, just like they can't be virgins, both are words reserved for females, but men can be whore-mongers and fornicators. We shouldn't not have compassion for them, but we can't allow them to espouse lies. You are correct though, anyone who has sex before marriage is a fool.
Men who tend to have a lot of sex outside of marriage with no emotional support or lots of children tend die fairly young. Mainly because the body is in perma hunt fuck and knock up mode.
This pretty much quickly drains a body of energy and a mind of anything approaching normality and the vital intimacy that we crave and ultimately need to survive.
That and nutting a lot leads to prostate problems latter on.
Are you faggots retarded? You think anyone who opposes misogyny on the Internet is an SJW. You realize that a lot of people who aren't feminists or even liberals think shit like this is retarded, don't you? It's especially hilarious when you do something extreme, like send a woman death threats for talking about HURR GAYYYYMES; suddenly anyone who thinks that's retarded is an SJW.
Short answer it's a sin. Long answer is a matter of loyalty, a woman is supposed to be faithful to her husband and having partners before marriage is damaging to her soul. It jades her to pleasure that is meant to be reserved for her husband and utilized to raise children.
>The first penis has not done any damage to the woman
Wrong, it break the hymen and thus damages the vagina
> in fact penises and vaginas are literally made to interface.
wrong an elephant penis cannot interface with a chihuahua vagina
The idea that men can do whatever they want but women can't is only able to be perpetuated by a society where men hold power. If all things were equal, there would not be slut shaming.
>Innocence isn't inherently valuable, and doesn't imply that a person will be more loving.
Innocence as defined by fewer or no sexual relationships and sexual partners actually does imply higher chance of loyalty and a higher chance of being loving. As their relationship and sexual history increases their ability to maintain a long term relationship or even emotionally and sexually satisfactory relationships decreases exponentially.
That's actually been studied and has been proven to be the case 100% of the time.
It's why men who find out their girlfriends/wives/could be might be's have been around the the block and or played for both teams and realize that there is more then likely no future there, that you'll leave or have no emotional or sexual impact that will make her want to stick around and begin to emotionally distance ourselves in preparation for when she inevitably leaves or cheats.
> in fact penises and vaginas are literally made to interface.
wrong an elephant penis cannot interface with a chihuahua vagina
I would really love to know how you got interspecies sex out of the guy's comment.
>sexual preference is sufficient to justify sexual activity.
So if a serial child rapist engages in his preferred activity that sexual preference is justification? I understand this is an extreme example, but you need to clarify your argument. Consenting adults are not absolved from wrong doings.
Yeah but they aren't. Men are stronger and smarter and have all the power. It's been this way since the dawn of mankind and that will never change. so all you can do is accept it.
Omg fuckers why don't we make a bunch of fake social media accounts and make this a trend. See SJW landwhale screech in terror. Its clearly what OP was hoping for but obviously the new fagotry is so dense that no one could possible fathom this.
Wisdom from the beginning of time is still wisdom today. The truth never changes, God has been around since before time. Do you expect the argument that Old=wrong to be valid with me?
a little late to the thread but pic related
also, love the idea
You just found it today? You're only about 4 months late.
Let me put this into terms that should be easy to understand...
... Men have decided to excercise their right to choose.
Do you not know what a counter example is? It's a logical definition, look it up.
Yes and I'm not wrong
Where did I include any of that. God is only invisible to us because he hides himself from us. The only foolishness one can have towards God is a lack of belief in him considering the overwhelming evidence of his existence.
>no need to preach the word of god
I preach to sinners, and seeing as how you think you don't need it I preach to you with good justification.
Men can be whores. And they can be virgins. People think that virginity is hymen. A virgin is a person who has never ever had sex. Men and women who whore themselves out are equally stupid. And since you're bringing up the Bible, there's also verses pointing out how guys should also be faithful to their wives.
The thing is, that example you gave wasn't even necessary. What the other guy said was correct and it was obvious he was talking about humans.
Why the sarcasm?
Yeah, men do have a majority of the power, but this isn't because men are greedily hording it, many men simply don't realize how they are wielding that power in ways that perpetuate inequality. As a man, I actually think that if most men could experience being a woman and what it's like to not be taken seriously intellectually because of irrelevant factors like how large your breasts are or how much sex you have or how pretty you are, I think many, many men would change their behavior.
Social movements like feminism seek to call out this inequality and create conversations about it. Calling out inequality isn't about forcibly taking power from the powerful demographic, it's about being empathetic to your fellow human being.
>and doesn't imply that a person will be more loving.
>isn't inherently valuable
>but blind submission to faggots in robes
Why do you bring homosexuality into this discussion? And it's not blind submission, in the ultimate sense of irony that is what the demons tell you when it applies directly to you.
>2000 year old book
>contradicts itself at every turn
There are no contradictions in the Bible all can be explained within the context and message
> A virgin is a person who has never ever had sex.
This is the new definition, it was changed purposely to demoralize men via comparison. The devil is crafty.
>Men and women who whore themselves out are equally stupid
I agree that fornicators are foolish
>And since you're bringing up the Bible, there's also verses pointing out how guys should also be faithful to their wives.
I never said anything to the contrary. A man who has sex outside of marriage does it out of lust which is expressly prohibited in the bible.
Cavils are met with cavils, Answer a fool according to his folly
>Yes and I'm not wrong
So where's the Elephantism movement railing against oppression by the all-powerful Chihuahuas? Oh, there isn't one, because that's not a thing, and your argument is incredibly stupid and, yes, wrong, in every possible sense, you fucking twat.
are you saying you've never fucked your pillow?
I used to have a small soccer ball shaped pillow I would put in my underwear and hump at night when I first learned about masturbation.
The sarcasm wasn't necessary, though. They may not be common, but there's women who never develop the hymen. And as another guy mentioned, there's other ways to accidentally break it. >>598968928
> A virgin is a person who has never ever had sex.
>This is the new definition, it was changed purposely to demoralize men via comparison. The devil is crafty.
Uh... that really does not make sense at all. How is that a new definition? And does it even demoralize men? You're not making any sense. You're the first Christian I've met to ever think this.
>good luck to you.
No it's a counter example within the domain of reality. One counter example destroys a "for all X, Y" style argument. This is propositional logic 101.
>Uh... that really does not make sense at all.
Change the definition and you create confusion which can be utilized. Eg Sin becomes wisdom, light becomes dark. There is nothing new under the sun. The devil uses the same tricks that he has used since the beginning of time.
>And does it even demoralize men?
It makes it incredibly tempting for a heterosexual male to remain a honorable out of fear of being perceived as weak by his peers.
> You're not making any sense.
It is because I am teaching calculus to a toddler, you don't have the fundamentals, how can you understand truth.
God is alive, he is the first and last. Without him we could do nothing.
>Change the definition and you create confusion which can be utilized. Eg Sin becomes wisdom, light becomes dark. There is nothing new under the sun. The devil uses the same tricks that he has used since the beginning of time.
>It makes it incredibly tempting for a heterosexual male to remain a honorable out of fear of being perceived as weak by his peers.
If a person screws someone just so they can stop being seen as weak for being a virgin, that person is a complete moron who needs to grow a thicker skin. The definition of virginity doesn't cause this. Stupid people cause this.
>It is because I am teaching calculus to a toddler, you don't have the fundamentals, how can you understand truth.
Are you assuming I'm an atheist just because I'm disagreeing with you on some things?
The fact of the matter is that a penis does not get smaller with use, whereas most vaginas will wear down with usage and age. Child birth is devastating to a vagina, shit will never be the same.
>The definition of virginity doesn't cause this.
Anything that causes temptation is purposely designed to cause temptation. There is nothing that exists that doesn't have purpose NOTHING. The definition in the Bible only applies to women, thus the definition was changed over time. Virgin and whore are terms only meant to be applied exclusively to women, anyone else who uses them otherwise has been deceived.
>Are you assuming I'm an atheist just because I'm disagreeing with you on some things?
And where in my post do I say that I assume you to be an atheist? I only assume you to be a fool and that is only because of the quality of your arguments. You make assumptions that are based on what you perceive me to say but not what I actually say and you argue against staunch wisdom.
I live my life everyday how I want to live it I don't need feminism to tell me how to live my life. The world is never going to be perfect and there will always be assholes.
What grinds my gears is the false rape accusers making it hard for the real victims to get the help they deserve.
>You're pretty much suggesting that the universe itself was designed to cause temptation.
Not everything is a temptation, but things that are temptations were designed so. Everything that exists, exists for a reason. God is no fool.
First hashtags I actually like.
Pic related it's OP.
I love how this thread is some faggot trolling pretending to be SJW, cancerfags dumping "banana maymay" images, and some Christfag trying to explain everything through his batshit crazy worldview (also probably trolling).
>Anything that causes temptation is purposely designed to cause temptation. There is nothing that exists that doesn't have purpose NOTHING. The definition in the Bible only applies to women, thus the definition was changed over time. Virgin and whore are terms only meant to be applied exclusively to women, anyone else who uses them otherwise has been deceived.
The Bible does mention male whores as well. Anything can cause temptation, both good and/or bad. The thing is, you have to resist the bad temptation.
>And where in my post do I say that I assume you to be an atheist? I only assume you to be a fool and that is only because of the quality of your arguments. You make assumptions that are based on what you perceive me to say but not what I actually say and you argue against staunch wisdom.
I was asking if you were assuming that, not asking why were you claiming I was. And no offense, but you're coming off as a rather arrogant person. I suggest you be careful with that.
The resonance men don't want sluts is because women don't actually give sex away freely to just anybody, whereas men do. When you date a guy you've done literally nothing to earn his sex, it's free. In that sense you're on equal footing with all his past numbers. That's not the same with women, they expect something in return from *some* men. No guy wants to know that he's splitting his networth, risking losing his kids, taking care of, protecting and investing in a woman that requires him to do all those things in order to get to have sex with her, if he knows there's a string of men in her past that got the pussy for free. No smart man anyways.
Shits not fair but thats life. Just like safe sex is a womens responsibility. Shes gets knocked up, she gets more stds including cancer from hpv. Its wrose for a women to sleep around simply because the way shes designed. She catches all the fluids, shit stays inside of her.. You cant scrub the inside of your cunt like i can my cock. The list goes on and on. If all women slept around and there was no challenge there would be far less men wanting sex all the time.
A man cannot be tempted to worship the lord for pleasure, because a temptation implies that the result is evil.
> Are you going to tell me that sins like greed, lust and gluttony can only related to single material things?
Only things that please the flesh, everything pleasing to the spirit cannot be temptation
Do you have the verses? I only remember the term "whore-monger". The only temptation is bad temptation, there are no good temptations like there are no good sins.
>I was asking if you were assuming that, not asking why were you claiming I was.
>And where in my post do I say that I ASSUME you to be an atheist?
Why are you saying that I made a claim? I was only questioning your assumption about my question. Obfuscation is the devil's bread and butter.
>And no offense, but you're coming off as a rather arrogant person.
Wisdom seems like folly to fools. Good, I would only be worried if I were to seem wise to you.
Wait, so you'd be worried if you were making sense? You realize you just said that you WANT us to not see things your way, right? Fuck this faggot...
Deuteronomy 23:17 "No Israelite, whether man or woman, may become a temple prostitute."
1 Kings 14:24
There were even male shrine prostitutes in the land; the people engaged in all the detestable practices of the nations the LORD had driven out before the Israelites.
1 Kings 15:12
He expelled the male shrine prostitutes from the land and got rid of all the idols his ancestors had made.
1 Kings 22:46
He rid the land of the rest of the male shrine prostitutes who remained there even after the reign of his father Asa.
2 Kings 23:7
He also tore down the quarters of the male shrine prostitutes that were in the temple of the LORD, the quarters where women did weaving for Asherah.
They die in their youth, among male prostitutes of the shrines.
And you're again misunderstanding what I said. I asked you if you were assuming I was an atheist because I didn't understand what you said. That's why I asked, to be sure if you were assuming I was one or not. I didn't say you were claiming I was one.
>Wisdom seems like folly to fools. Good, I would only be worried if I were to seem wise to you.
You're not being seen as wise because you're being arrogant. If you're trying to explain your beliefs to someone, you can do it without name-calling.
newfags getting reeled in by shittier and shittier bait now
>Wait, so you'd be worried if you were making sense?
Classic misrepresentation of your opponents speech. Like all cowards you can only lie to win arguments. I would be worried if you perceived me as a wise man because that would make me wise to a fool making me a fool.
>You realize you just said that you WANT us to not see things your way, right?
I said nothing of the like. I would love for you to see things the bible's way(KJV).
>1 Kings 14:24
And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.
There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.
You are using the wrong version of the Bible (KJV), and the irony is that even in the wrong version the word is prostitute which a common biblical symbol of people being led astray from God.
>And you're again misunderstanding what I said. I asked you if you were assuming I was an atheist because I didn't understand what you said. That's why I asked, to be sure if you were assuming I was one or not. I didn't say you were claiming I was one.
>You're not being seen as wise because you're being arrogant.
I'm not seen as wise BY YOU because I am not wise to fools. Please read the KJV bible
Thank you for pretty much admitting I was wasting my time with you arguing semantics.
And I don't see why you think I was using a "red herring".
You're not wise, you're just arrogant and prideful. And in case you forgot, pride is a sin.
No, lets instead trust the version that is based on translations since worn out because of overuse because they were the real transcripts and the transcribers were good at spotting errors in the text. Almost every other version has new age philosophy intwined within the scripture, luckily the original message is so powerful that even with these lies the truth can escape. But the fact remains that all other manuscripts are inferior to the KJV
God is no fool, and even lies can't help but expose themselves for what they are.
why did you play the dumb white knight instead of just posting the pic and hashtag. they sell it on their own.
unless you were actually serious posting this thread on /b/, which is nearly inconceivable
I'm not even a guy and this is pissing ME off.
Stupid post is stupid.
op is a joke.
People replying are a joke.
The shitty memes are a joke.
Pls. No more.
Someone just post porn or something
Why does the truth bother you woman? I have nothing but compassion for you and you must know that your soul is in danger. Please get right with the lord. (read the KJV Bible)
THERE IS NO GOD BUT MAN, THERE IS NO BELIEF BUT OF YOURSELF. YOU ARE BLINDED BY FALSE PROPHET'S AND MANIPULATED BY LIES OF MEN THAT ARE GREATER THAN YOU. CAST OF THESE ILLUSIONS AND EMBRACE YOUR OWN GODHOOD, CHILD OF A SIMPLER AGE.
God is greater than you and no man can forge wisdom to enslave someone in a way that would make him harder to manipulate. The bible requires you to root out lies and to expose evil in power. The God of the KJV bible equates himself to the lowest among his children. The bible says that love, patience, hope and kindness are tantamount. Ye shall know them by their fruit. What do you advocate? Believe whatever you want just because? And you blatantly lie, and to what end and for what good? You say I am manipulated by lie and those are lines feed to you by demons.
The book is the word, but if you don't have the book the world should be sufficient enough for the truth (Romans 1:20)
THERE IS NO WORD BUT THAT OF MAN. THERE IS NO VOICE BUT THAT OF MAN. OH CHILD THAT IS AFRAID OF IT'S OWN POTENCY, CAST OF THE VEIL OF YOUR IGNORANCE AND EMBRACE THE WONDER OF YOUR OWN EXISTANCE.
just sayin' again.
The original KJV included the Apocrypha. Its writers were inspired by God to do so. Only in the late 19th century did American Heathen cults remove these holy books to further corrupt the Bible of Kings and solidify their blasphemous abomination of Christianity.
YOU USE THE WORDS OF YOUR MASTER, SLAVE OF A WOE BEGOTTEN AGE. THE LIES ARE THOSE OF YOUR MASTER, FORCED INTO YOUR MEWLING ORIFICE WHEN YOUR THOUGHT'S WHERE AS A LEAF UPON THE WIND. FIND WITHIN YOURSELF THE POWER INHERENT TO ALL MANKIND, TREAT THE THOUGHT'S OF LONG DEAD MISCREANTS AS THERE WEAPON AGAINST THEE AND COME INTO LIGHT OF TRUE ENLIGHTENMENT.