I've been looking at your crappy forum for some time, and I just wanted to say that what disgusts me most is not the gore, the racism or the 'fatphobic' attacks on healthy, curvy women. Actually it's the creepthreads.
If this picture gives you an erection, you are a racist. That's because this women did not gve consent. It's as simple as that.
Please tell me, how do you justify yourselves?
I'd race that cunt cos I'm the racey racist
You seem sexually frustrated, OP. Maybe these will help you get off.
How do you not see the difference between looking at someones publicly exposed body and being a rapist? Just because she doesnt give you consent to take the picture doesn't equal to not giving consent to rape her. Its just a whole different ballpark.
rape is defined as only physical penetration. stop being a faggot. ive imagined raping you so hard already, that first pic thank you for posting that, got me hard enough to jerk it to the thought of your bloody asshole after i mind raped you.
Because you are using a woman as a sexual object without giving her human respect or even a choice.
Also, you really think it doesn't emotionally effect women to have creepy guys staring at them all day?
for fuck sake can we get some creep shots already?
Staring is different. I glance at girls when they walk by sometimes I check them out and look a little. But they do the same to me. Just because it may not be polite. I say its up to the person who is doing it to decide what they masturbate to. Some have different standards than others. I would gladly jack off to these sluts in the pics but never to my mom. I draw that line. Some don't though. Who am I stop them? I can't and no one can. Ever. Thats telling us what we can and can not think about. Do you want to live in a world with thought crimes?
>can we get some creep shots
>posts a self-shoot pic
>mfw asks for creep shots - doesn't post a creep shot
No, you are right that I wouldn't want to police people's thoughts. But this thread was originally about pictures. If you want to THINK about molesting a baby, then nobody can stop you. But if you like at child porn, you'll go to jail. Similarly, I think creep shots should be criminalized as visual rape.
This IS rape.
The way in which you share your body must be a CHOICE.
And you 'boys' have a choice too. Support these women and do not look at these pictures. Or, look at them and contribute to their sexual assault for that is what it is.
I like this one but I have no idea how this pic went on internet. I mean, this is a family picture, and you can clearly see that she is half naked. Who would put that on internet?
(4) (A) Any person who intentionally distributes the image of the intimate body part or parts of another identifiable person, or an image of the person depicted engaged in an act of sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation, sexual penetration, or an image of masturbation by the person depicted or in which the person depicted participates, under circumstances in which the persons agree or understand that the image shall remain private, the person distributing the image knows or should know that distribution of the image will cause serious emotional distress, and the person depicted suffers that distress.
Doing this is about to become a federal felony in the US and anyone convicted will have to register as a sex offender.
Thanks for your kind words. I am but an apprentice in the comedic arts.
You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their private photos without their consent. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. The images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit" due to the nature of the nude photographs being stole and originating from celebrities, which basically means that you're being aroused because their non-consent turns you on. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these nude photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
Source: Ph.D in clinical psychology.
Furthermore, I am aware of the fact that legislation is now being pursued to make the act of stealing and sharing nude photographs without the consent of the other party a punishable sexual assault crime that can either be a felony or misdemeanor depending on the severity of the crime. I'd be careful if I were you, future law breakers.
>implying SCOTUS hasn't already ruled that you have no expection of privacy in public
>implying SCOTUS hasnt ruled that of someone takes a pictire of you on a public space that picture is the property of the photographer
Don't you fucking try to sexually harrass me. I WILL file charges against you and your entire community. These kinds of statements are no different than RAPE. YOU are a fucking RAPIST.
If staring at pictures of girls wearing revealing clothes in public is wrong, I don't wan to be right.
so many loads spilled thinking about sticking my pen0r between dees tits
Right, but if I walk around with my dick out I can't be mad at people who would see me or stare or even take a picture. there are men's bathing suits that are thongs, but I don't wear one. There are men's booty shorts, and again, I don't wear them. No one is asking these women to have sexualized body parts in plain sight. It's their CHOICE
OP here. Please note that the above posts are not mine. I am not quite this bad at bait.
We have nothing to say to that. To intellectual for /b/. Nice atempt to bring some humanity into this place but you're wasting your time.
I actually find myself agreeing with most of what you say. Good argument.
>Dumbass doesn't know the difference between RACIST and RAPIST
>taking pictures of non-consensual private parts
>No physical contact
>You're an idiot
How's the SJW field going? Gender studies getting you down?
If this picture gives you an erection, you are a racist
Well shit, I thought it was my aversion to non whites that made me racist. Thank you for opening my eyes to what racism is all about.
You are a fucking idiot. You don''t know the meaning of racist or consent. Racist has to do with race, you know skin color. Consent is given when she goes out in public dressed like that. So fuck you dummy. Sage
LawFag here. No, no it is not. Penetration is necessary to constitute rape.
>“The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”
If you can get an erection by looking at a white girl, then you are perpetuating white privilege and failing to contribute to a racially progressive society.
This may sound stupid but I am deadly fucking serious. I have trained myself to any get erect for non-white girls. It's the least I could do after centuries of slavery and lynching.
Boldly and purposefully showin that much snatch in public, makes open game.
What would ya lameass think if old men walked around showing their junk as much as women throw it out there?
>Posts FEDERAL Bureau of Investigation bage
>Cites California State Law...
>just because op fag I will post a non-candid pic that is completely irrelevant
If men showed that much in daily activities, they'd be arrested and charged with exposure or some shat.
Cover ya shit fems, as much as you wish...aand hey, what happened to momma teachin yall to keep ya damn legs closed???
Privacy laws apply differently if someone is in the public eye. Their lives qualify as 'public interest'. That's why newspapers can publish libelous stories about celebs but not about real people.
>people are still falling for this shit
Why hasn't this website been shut the fuck down already? FBI must be aware of the sociopaths that roam this fucking board.
Its disgusting. I find it funny how you faggots find humor in every tragedy, yet you are that one faggot in the back of the class who no one even knows is there. There's nothing funny about this.
I wish you fucks experienced tragedy similar to this. Maybe it will restore your long lost humanity
why you so mad lol
its just a bit of fun sexy chicks and ive been laid by more then my hand meny times
smoke a joint and chill out
Well they are about to find out because I'm on the phone to the FBIs head of cyber crimes right now telling him EXACTLY what goes on in this sick pedo rapist community.
You're pathetic misogynist board is about to get shut down permanently.
it hasn't been shut down because it is easily monitored here.
If the FBI shuts it down the actions and feelings don't stop, they just get shared in a new place that isn't under watch the way this one is.
Damn look at that smooth as fuck Wesley snipes mofuka. Look how calmly he passes a bitch without looking making her question her attractiveness.
Or maybe she just wasn't a fat fuck blacks love.
is there anyone on tonight that doesn't work for the FBI cause apparently half of you do which i find hard to believe
>thinking every joke is an attempted troll
>greentexting incorrectly whilst calling others newfag
No, just no. Women should be hairless from the neck down. Even the little peach fuzz shit needs to go.
Hairy snatch is nasty snatch and faggots like you, encouraging women to be unappealing, should be forcibly castrated.
And you're a closet PEDO
Women have hair - little girls don't
So what do you like so much about little girls?
Stupid faggot you can turn smoke detectors off and what makes you think any of that is true?
ive got a lot more like that haha