>is good grammar yes?
photorealistic =/= real children
No children have been harmed in the making of a drawing. It doesn't matter if it's realistic.
Big fat cock in your mouth blasting greasy gay cum down your throat
i from russia, sorry for grammar and other thing
i try my english here
why do you rely on harm to children?
you mean pictures of nude children, what made without the use of violence is good and allowed?
404 dubs not found
why browse these threads if theyre triggering you, moralfags?
I mean drawings of nude children. Not actual pictures. I'm not saying any sort of child pornography with actual children should be allowed. Only drawings. Realistic or not. (by realistic I don't mean real btw)
In legal terms, theres something called "harm"
For example, if you are hit by a bus, you have been given physical harm by the bus.
If you cannot prove that there is a harm, then there is no case.
lets take 2 images - first - 4yo girl raped to death
second - exact copy of first, but draw. same as first,pixel to pixel.
you mean first - bad, but second - allowed, because its picture?
Oh, so you're really wasting your time since you're not trolling anyone here and actively encourage more loli threads on /b/ by helping us reach the image limit faster? How nice of you :)
These are drawings. Its not based on real living girls or whatsoever. It exists out of lines and squigels that are colored in on a piece of paper or with a graphic design software. Therefore the "girls"in the images can`t even have age besides the datum of when it was created with a graphic design software. Comparing graphical designed pictures with actual cp is stupid. That`s like comparing goku to brock lesnar.
That`like saying that marvel comics should be banned because it contains violence,rape,murder etc.
Totally irrelevant and impossible.
why did i should
>argue that the drawn picture caused harm to any existing girl
is photo cause any harm?
rape cause, not photo
so, photos that contain rape scene should be banned
pictures, that contain rape scene should be allowed
where the diffenence?
Its sad to think someone in the world actually has a folder on his pc that is filled with fat gay porn. Makes me glad because no matter how low i sink,or how weird of a fetish i have,there is always this guy with a folder filled with fat gay porn.
Reality vs fiction. The one in the drawing is not a real person dipshit, that's the difference.
I could murder someone and eat their corpse, or I could draw myself murdering someone and eating their corpse. What's the difference?
Only trolls are this dumb.