Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network issues. Refreshing the page usually helps. The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact. You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random
>>608450662 So here's what we do. Somebody needs to track her down and find her daughter. Get to know her, have a long, steady friendly relationship with her. After a couple of months, years, ask her out. Keep dating, then after a few dates have your first kiss.
Fastforward and after very much time, you're in bed, making out. Start fiddling around. She will probably start grinding. Stop, get up, reach in your backpack and take out a breathalyzer, Have her blow in it. At this point she will probably be freaked out but assure her it's fine. Then take out a pre-filled form with blanks, something along the lines of. "I, _____ , born on __________, state of ___________, city ___________ consent to have sex with ____________ .
and add some tick boxes for - oral sex - anal sex - fetishes
At this point she will probably lose her shit, so show her the video. That would be fun to watch
>>608450662 Goddam this woman's sex with her husband must be comatosingly boring! (Assuming she didn't divorce her husband for "rape" or her husband hasn't already sensibly dropped her like a hot brick).
"Hey honey, remember it's date night. I was thinking we could go to a nice restaurant, maybe a movie, have a bottle of wine, become intimate later."
"No. Here's what's going to happen. I'm going to wear an Amish sack-cloth dress and Mormon underwear. We will go for a date which you will of course entirely pay for and co-ordinate, or else I might not like you by the end of the evening, in which case intimacy is out of the question. I will not touch a single drop of inebriants for the duration of the evening. When we return, should you have adhered to all my esoteric sexual rules, I will hitch up my hessian petticoats, and you may thrust into me exactly thirty seven times. You must pause between every thrust and ask my express permission to continue before doing so. If you ignore any of these instructions, I will tell your daughter that you raped Mommy. Any questions?"
Sounds like a stand-up dame! One wonders how she even procreated?
>>608452668 What was a lie about that picture? It was women (mostly middle-aged ugly bints) saying they don't understand why anyone would find that young Asian woman attractive, with some of them throwing in some quite vitriolic and painfully transparent projections.
>>608452864 I'm not so sure. From the video it seems to suggest her daughter is only starting to develop a complex vocabulary, and the woman appears to be nearing middle age...
But come to think of it, that has just made me consider this video could mean one of two things, other than the obvious:
1) Her daughter is actually fairly mature, but has learning difficulties, and possibly mental disabilities. This would explain a very over-protective attitude, and an appeal that people interact with her daughter on a very simplistic, unsubtle social level. Or... 2) This woman was a complete whore when she was younger, and is making vicarious projective behaviour through her daughter as penance for her own hot-dog down a hallway vagina.
>>608453490 "I told you Mom, I'm going round to Jane's house to do some homework." "OK hun, be back soon!" >mfw 'Jane's house' is the local bus station bathroom where she's taking fifty black dicks a day for a scrappy tensbit of half oregano, half weed, then goes and smokes it with her oblivious thick as two shits jock 27yo boyfriend who fucks her six ways from Sunday in the back of his car, wading in McDonalds cartons and 'Perfect Abs' magazine, behind a bush off a freeway.
>>608453700 The 'Global Sorority' is not a conspiracy theorist postulated by anti-SJW Feminist men, as I think you're interpreting my mentioning of it, but the often female lauded 'ability' for them to hate each other beyond all reason or sense, but then band into some kind of artificial pillow-fort when faced with the most inconsequential attack on any one of their person.
>>608453097 > This isn't even feminism, just jealous old bitches. You seem to not be understanding the point.
The point is, feminists are always whining that men are always judging women by their looks and not their talent. This just shows that women do it too.
Another similar thing.
Remember when that Australian news anchor worse the same jacked for a year without anyone noticing? He did it to show how unfair it was that his female co-host had to wear a new dress every day or be criticised for it. Later, when commenting on it, she said that it was mainly women who would criticise her on blogs and things.
Basically, women are a vapid and shallow as men are, it's not some patriarchal conspiracy to keep women down.
>>608454241 >which is completely different than men The name is pretty fucking misleading then, it's really more of a limited local phenomenon than a global one. Women in India or China don't give a fuck about Western Feminism, for example.
>patriarchal conspiracy you don't understand the concept in the slightest. It's not a conspiracy, just a set of customs that have continued on in Western civilization for centuries, influencing both men and women.
>>608456666 >proof that being fat is not healthy That and all the heart attacks and strokes.
If you've ever known anyone in EMT or Paramedics, there is nothing worse than dealing with a dying obese person. It's like a 4 man team just to get them to the hospital and you have to fight back the urge to gag constantly cause they smell like decomposing meat and shit.
>>608457325 >I never understood the whole shaving thing. Dont shave if you dont want to , you arent being forced. But dont fucking expect people to find it attractive.
That s kind of what I wrote on the right side. (In french... Cause it was to shut up a feminist who posted this shit on my facebook feed. ) Translated it means: "Yup, totaly... But don t complain if people don t find this attractive, that would be trying to impose YOUR view of beaty on them".
>>608454932 >patriarchal conspiracy >you don't understand the concept in the slightest. It's not a conspiracy, just a set of customs that have continued on in Western civilization for centuries, influencing both men and women. And it's kept up by men AND women. Thus, it's not patriarchal. I'm not saying that there aren't problems with society when it comes to women, but blaming "the patriarchy" is basically just blaming men for it.
>>608458332 >thus, it's not patriarchal yeah it is, learn what the fucking word means
>patriarchal: social rule by the father of a family
It's not about who's SUPPORTING it, it's about who runs the family/clan/village/city-state/nation/empire. The fact that women have traditionally supported a model of male leadership does not invalidate the fact it exists.
>blaming "the patriarchy" is basically just blaming men no it's not, that's just what overly-sensitive gender warriors think. Buy a clue, retard.
>>608459898 >overly sensitive gender warriors being triggered by other overly sensitive gender warriors this is nothing but juvenile stupidity. it's not real feminism or even significant and you're not accomplishing anything by giving them attention.
>>608460063 Enough of "That s not real feminism" bullshit. Feminism has not a code of conduct. They are as legitimate as any other feminism... This "not real feminis(m/t)" bullshit is just an excuse when you confront them with their bad actions... It s time to assume the good AND the bad.
>>608460944 They're the only feminists YOU'RE concerned with, though.
Why would they be more relevant than feminists that actually want equality? You're responding to a vocal minority as if they represented the whole movement when their only real significance is internet trolling.
Call them feminists if you want, but they certainly are overly sensitive gender warriors, and so are you.
>>608461591 >They're the only feminists YOU'RE concerned with, though.
Exept I m concerned with both.
>Why would they be more relevant than feminists that actually want equality?
They are AS revelant as other feminists... But you know... Classic Feminists just don t condamn theses trends... Todays feminists expect the males condamning the bad behavior of other males... But when it comes to bad feminist behaviors... or just bad female behaviors, they remain silent... That s that double standard that is pissing people.
> You're responding to a vocal minority as if they represented the whole movement when their only real significance is internet trolling.
And that s exacly what feminists are doing with mens... Responding to a vocal minority... But hey as they are female, they are opressed... So they don t have to do what they preach...
>Call them feminists if you want, but they certainly are overly sensitive gender warriors, and so are you.
I don t call them feminists... THEY CALL THEMSELVES FEMINISTS... I want equality but feminism is too "women centered" for this purpose.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.