Last on got deleted for having "toon" art. Let's hope this one isn't.
Also forgot the archive
All the Lalafell imma post for now. Love that little race, but don't want to cap the thread with one subject.
My personal favorite from the last few draw threads.
>Last on got deleted for having "toon" art
Sounds like that shithead mod making up reasons to delete things he doesn't like again.
This was fun while it lasted...
It happens periodically, nobody gets banned and we just make a new one a day later. I get the feeling it's usually done by someone who either A) wants the arguing to stop or B) sees a shit ton of stuff posted that's not allowed (like furries)
>A) wants the arguing to stop
Then they would purge the whole board.
>B) sees a shit ton of stuff posted that's not allowed (like furries)
Excuses like that don't mean much when we have archives.
Sorting through pictures and I think this might count as a shortstack but also not quite sure. Maybe could try editing to make her thicker and shorter, but maybe it counts as it is and might please someone. Very sorry if is not.
Body shape is similar, but...
Loli is innocent, pure. Typically less hips involved. Needs to be led into situations.
Shortstack, not so much. They're mentally older, typically perverted. Impish. They'd be the teasing aggressor in bed that you don't typically see from loli. Also usually has dem hips.
There has to be something about them that indicates age. It can be hips, it can be breasts, it can be just a feminine body shape. They can't just be tubes. They have to be short too.
Proportionally they have large heads and short limbs with either shorter or regularly proportioned torso as to make them seem a little stumpier. If they just look like adults shrunk or like kids you're doing it wrong.
Boobs CAN be a useful indicator of shortstackhood, though.
gonna post some of a friend's shortstack.
Does Toadette count as shortstack?
I normally don't like forced but that is hot as hell.
I love Boogie's art, but I'm not a fan of vore. What's great is you can simply edit it into something else!
Please don't import your ERP drama to this thread.
Can't remember the last time I've seen such an abused shortstack thread practically raped by retarded anons trying to force feed us blatant pedophilia. Its fucking nauseating...this isn't some kind of loophole to get around /d/ policy god dammit.
The last thread I made for shortstacks was banned for being "western toon art"
Better chance of these getting banned due to goblins than Lalafell, since technically, goblins are against the /d/ rules, while Lalafell are not.
I think what he's referring to is that a great many artists tend to REALLY go out of their way to emphasize very loli-like features when portraying them and think just because of this species loophole they think that makes it all okay.
It really comes down to personal responsibility and using some sense to really LOOK at each image before you post to make sure it isn't obviously meant to appeal to pedophiles.
Now see that I just don't understand at all. Why are they against the rules?
These are the rules of /d/
1."Alternative" images including: futanari, bondage, tentacles, etc. are welcome. Caveats below.
2. Images depicting bestiality, guro, scat, or generally seen to be "extreme" in nature are not to be uploaded.
3. Western drawn/styled ("toon") pictures and fan drawn ("fanart") images are not allowed.
Mind you, I don't agree with them myself. But, when I made the last thread, I was banned and given rule 3 for reason.
And yet more than half of the recurring threads on /d/ thrive almost entirely on western art and the mods choose to overlook it. I'll never understand this place. I guess they mean western "looking" art as opposed to that which more emphasizes eastern styles?
I think the problem with those rules is that they were made back in the old days of dial up. Western art and furry shit were banned mainly because all western and furry shit at the time was of abysmal quality. Like Simpsons porn done in crayon.
As time went on better "western" artists came about and mods looked the other way because the artwork wasn't complete and utter shit.
The rules were never updated or revised to reflect that.
Too bad we've had this fucking conversation a million times so everyone is sick of them. Then the assholes that post loli shit use the argument fatigue as an excuse or a way to stop people from calling them out on their bullshit.
You can not tell me that >>5999505 or >>5999524 or >>5999515 ain't fucking loli.
Fuck guys, >>5999533 is in a fucking japanese gradeschool swimsuit.
> a fucking japanese gradeschool swimsuit.
And your point would be what?
Shit guys, she's wearing a swimsuit, I guess it's not shorstack anymore.
Yes of course, because THAT was the point being made in that comment. God damn you guys are good at dodging the obvious.
Coming from personal experience on F-List and as a fellow owner of a gobbo slut profile, it's absolutely true. And she acts indignant if anyone implies that it's hard finding artwork of goblins that aren't her.
Because the mindset often is that, when creating profiles for goblin sluts, the lion's share of the decent art is already monopolized by her and she has a reputation of demanding anyone who uses artwork of her character remove it, often throwing a very public fit in chats, and then those people are ostracized for 'causing drama.' It becomes a lot of people's problems.
I really wish Spiral Knights got updates that aren't just overpriced costume packs.
We talkin' about Sparkshine here? Cause yeah, complete bitch. I'm not sure someone who forced another Goblin player to remove their pictures, and apparently pestered them enough that they just deleted the profile entirely is worth talking to.
Now though there's probably so many people using her pics that she can't realistically report them all.
Just to be different, maybe some dwarves?
Hell, how about some fan art of Daisy! It was quite the horrible tease to see JKLind talk about Max and another artist having drawn Daisy in some very... interesting situations and in the same breath flat out say no one would ever get to see them.
Incase's halflings have thinner, longer ears. S'probs a goblin. Compare...
Again....thats one of the few issues I have with InCase taking on Shortstack/Fantasy art; there are far fewer physical differences between species than in most other similar series. His Orc's basically look like full bodied humans with enlarged canines and his Goblins and Halflings are IDENTICAL with only skin color setting them apart. The one rendition he did of a "dwarf" was also somewhat weak; basically looked the same as his goblin/halfling template albeit with only slightly more muscle tone.
This is my one and only gripe...if you're going to take on a setting with various species with unique origins, TRY to think outside the box and your comfort zone and really strive to make sure this issue with people unsure of what it is you're trying to draw doesn't become too frequent.
>You will never order a shortstack prostitute
sockinabox. Drew the other Shortstack Dextra.
It's the difficult in recognizing dat booty and dem hips and dem thighs.
I know your pain, and I was the one who requested them.
It DOES help to imagine them next to a regular centaur and being significantly shorter, I find.
it goes in cycles. people run out of new content for this relatively obscure fetish and don't want to repost too much, so the threads slow down. then eventually we either get a new bunch of images, or it's been long enough that the old pics seem fresh again.
Im looking for this one gif its a shortstack on the side of a portable pool getting fucked in the butt. Purple with freckles and i believe it might have been futa. I just cant find it and forgot to save
Oh. My. God. Shortstack Pandaren. I didn't realize how much I wanted this until just now. I'm legitimately sad I came to another picture on this thread. I'd post a picture but I don't have any on my phone just live with my eternal thanks I suppose.
I honestly think it's one of the biggest problems with /d/. It's hard to tell people off for being too defensive about their fetishes, or too inflammatory towards others, when the board rules speffly state some things are too /d/ for /d/. No furry, loli, or bestiality. And I don't think furry or loli should be /d/ in themselves, but they should be allowed if they're on topic.
what is this, a picture for ants?