For when two just aren't enough...
(photoshop welcome, so long as they don't suck)
Here's a little something for my fellow artists...
To be honest... I don't know what they hope to accomplish with that. Art styles vary so much that there's really no way to know where something came from unless it's plastered with something obvious like kanji characters...
That said, I think a much better idea would be to split up /d into something for all the dudes with tits and something else for 'alternative' stuff. It's weird that more than half the board is futanari at any given time. Maybe /alt and /d would be more appropriate, but I don't care either way... So long as I get to look at freaky pron, futa included, I'm happy. ;)
I've been looking for months to complete this set, but nobody anywhere has all of them it seems. Here's what I'm scavenged so far, from all across the internet.
I have a few of these.
They aren't all multibreast, so I've uploaded them here: http://imgur.com/a/24A4T
non-content posting faggot
Well, I would assume, why do people make pictures of multi breasted women that way. But as a point of personal taste I'm sure it's just that they don't understand why in that they don't share the same opinion on what is arousing
I always assumed progressive rows were smaller because that's how it is with animals that have multiple rows of breasts. I've never personally verified this, so I could be way off, but personally I also prefer consistent size.
Personally, I think it's more believable.
Do a google search for "milk lines" to see what I mean.
Artists usually try to follow human anatomy and, while I can always appreciate a whole bunch of big boobies, it's more likely that the supernumerary pair(s) won't be as large as the primary set.
As an example...
These aren't necessarily believable:
But these make more sense in regards to milk lines and basic anatomy:
But they're all still fun to look at and imagine... :P
Was going to post her, but then I noticed this.
>Artists usually try to follow human anatomy and, while I can always appreciate a whole bunch of big boobies, it's more likely that the supernumerary pair(s) won't be as large as the primary set.
Back when he used to draw, pa'pan said something along the lines of finding it more anatomically correct being the other way, actually.
Here's an example of one of his.
Loved his stuff, and his was my first multi boob/cow girls. Could be why I'm biased towards it. But realism has no bearing on what I prefer and like.
This has his old site on it but it's been dead for so many years.
"Odd-numbered rows are ugly, and wrong from a embryologic view"
was his words actually
A little something I did for one of my stories...
That particular image came from this one:
I'm much better at photoshopping other people's art. ~_~
I'm not sure the images show up if you're not signed in... Not trying to promote that site or anything, just an observation.