Have you ever abused your strength /fit/?
bullied someone? have you become more aggressive with lifting?
I bullied an effeminate boy in elementary.
Today I'm a faggot trap, life is funny
Never abused it, I have been in one fight since I started lifting. Dude punched the bartender so I tried to put him through a wall
I shit you not his gf was saying "fuck him up Jeff!" When I had him by the lapel already.
Half picked him up, half dragged him to a wall where I bounced his head off the bricks, he went a little noodley pulled him back, his gf is grabbing my arm begging me to stop, bounced him off a nearby pole and finally stopped. When people were trying to break us up I grabbed his wrists and pulled him in toward me and said "if you don't fucking stop, I'm going to hurt you!" Couldn't think of anything else to say. Anyway I didn't realize how badly he was bleeding until I noticed blood on my hands.
Fucking fratboy Chad piece of shit. Kept calling the bar threatening me and the bartender.
she got what she deserved
it was a contest where you had to put your hand on the car as long as possible.
she spit on the people and threw her shoes at them, then she verbally assaulted the guy for like 1 hour and he snapped
The way I see it what's the point of fighting at this point of my /fit/ journey?
most of the cunts I tend to encounter a low test fatties and junkies with little to no accomplishments whether in the gym or personally. and is it really worth it to swing my dynamic arm and possibly break the sound barrier along with their skulls?
and over what? them feeling un masculine.
A little more background, asshole, was that he got wasted and started grabbing girls' butts, literally just looking for a fight. He and his friends started a brawl, involving two of my friends to break it up. This is what ended it
>Sitting by and watching it happen without doing anything is a better option
No, fuck YOU. You're the kind of person who sits and records on his cell phone instead of calling 911 or helping someone out. Fuck you, you piece of shit I hope someone fucking beats you near to death and people just stand around screaming world star while recording it.
In a bar I would call the fucking security guys, rather than get the shit sued out of me for assault.
Violence is not the answer, the rule of law and strict obedience of the rules is.
You fucking anarchist hippy piece of shit.
>calls me an asshole
>goes around beating up defenceless drunks
Dickhead. Drunks can't defend themselves, they're completely uncoordinated.
>Violence is not the answer, the rule of law and strict obedience of the rules is.
>Violence is not the answer, the rule of law and strict obedience of the rules is.
some fucking retard actually believes this
do you ever get out of your room you fucktard?
>tfw no Big Guy boyfriend to domestically abuse you and physically dominate you
>In a bar I would call the fucking security guys, rather than get the shit sued out of me for assault.
He punched the bartender which is battery. Defending him was within my legal touch.
>implying there was security
>Violence is not the answer, the rule of law and strict obedience of the rules is.
So tell him that punching the bartender is illegal and he should cease?
>You fucking anarchist hippy piece of shit.
Lol this fucking guy
>calls me an asshole
>goes around beating up defenceless drunks
Now I know you're a troll
>Dickhead. Drunks can't defend themselves, they're completely uncoordinated.
So why pick a fight? And who's to say he was drunk?
Seriously shut your bitch mouth.
Not a man of action. I get it. I said in the first post that I don't fight, but there is a time where stepping up and wrecking someone is the answer.
Weak mind, weak body.
wow, normally i would say they look like brony neckbeards, but they totally pull it off. they look like humphrey bogart in casablanca
listen up manlets i have a question. why do you little dwarf fuckers always use sneak attacks? there is no honour in sucker punching someone
I was an asshole before I started lifting and getting even stronger has just made me reach final form. If 2 people are walking my way on the side walk I will play red rover with them. If someone is walking slowly in front of me, I will reach out my hand place it on their shoulder and shove them to the side. because of this numerous people have wanted to fight me but I look like im fucking crazy as shit so nobody goes through with it.
>Weak mind, weak body
You think having Ordnung and Discipline is having a weak mind? Having a weak mind is giving into your animalistic impulses and breaking the rule of law by assaulting a man, a man that you had nothing to do with. In court, you would be convicted of assault and battery.
What do you even lift, you attention whoring tripfag?
Found a gf that i love. She works while i go yo school. When i get my MA we will switch off amd she will be the housewife. Pretty sweet being a trap in a lesbo relationship, pussy and you get to go out woth your qt looking qt and giving people boners when you make out with your wife in public.
Friend of mine tried to start shit and fight some kid who was too drunk for his own good. I yelled at him and got in his face.
He put his tail between his legs and backed down and then I convinced the bouncers to not kick any of us out even though he made a retarded scene.
I wouldn't call what I did an abuse though, better than a dumb dumb getting in a fight.
One time I did abuse it was when a "friend" who I actually kinda fucking hate (don't hang out with him at all anymore thankfully) was at my place and thought it would be funny to fuck with my chromecast from his phone while everyone else is trying to watch the shit playing. After he did it like 3 times and was giggling to himself like a little girl I just said "Ok, do that again and I'm hitting you, I don't want to, but I will." He stopped. I felt like kinda a dick and came off as one but I can't stand someone coming to my place and then acting like a fucking 2 year old like that.
>He punched the bartender which is battery. Defending him was within my legal touch.
LOL No. You can fuck someone up to prevent imminent bodily harm or death, but the amount you fuck them up has to be reasonable in the context of the situation. What you did (implying its true, which I doubt) would NEVER be considered legally viable.
Source: I'm a law student procrastinating on my 2nd to last take home exam for before I graduate.
I don't give a shit if you beat the dude up, but don't pretend you know the law and that you didn't risk serious personal liability ya dummy.
No never. I lift and compete in amateur kickboxing but i never been in a fight since high school and i never bully anyone. I simply don't like making other people feel bad about themselves and i got nothing to prove to anyone. just do what you love to do and be successful and don't worry about trying to be some alpha dominant male or whatever to make up for past years of insecurity.
Glad I didn't know that then. Still probably wouldn't have changed the course of action.
We were beyond picking fights. This was literally in the middle of a brawl.
>implying sneak attacks
>implying I didn't just SNK the fuckers
Back in my edgelord days I literally climbed the giants who would start shit with me, punched them in the gut and brought them down to the ground face first.
Yes i was bullied for my height stfu
>skinny kid who studied various martial arts growing up
>got into fights with BBfags and would fuck them up for laughs (punching elbow inside out = no bench press for you)
>decide to get big because 3rd dan black belt is apparently fedora as fuck and women don't like it
>achieve intermediate and advanced lifts, 5 mile runs 2x a week to aid recovery
>can fuck up anyone in my classes
>can out lift the majority of people I know
>still no girls interested in me
>pick fights with ghetto niggers (britfag so there are no guns only knives) on nights out
>leathered most of my county's "hardest guys"
>still no girls
>nobody is intimidated by me still because I have the charisma of a bar of soap and can't be scary
>people now pick fights with me to prove shit
>they don't realise I just shit them up
>BB bros think I can do it because I do BB
>I just agree, watch them get fucked up in fights when they try to prove shit
>tell them they don't do enough cardio or they missed muscle X (usually teres major for shits and giggles)
>nobody outside my classes knows I'm black belt
>BB guys dismiss martial arts
>I'm laughing at you fags every time you bring up "can you beat Ronda Rousey" threads
>punching elbow inside out
Know how I know you're lying?
>This was literally in the middle of a brawl.
A brawl in which you intervened, while it didn't involve you. Hence why you would be considered the assaulting party in this situation.
Same reason you're a dickhead. That and tripping on 4chan of course.
FUCKING ALL TRAPS WANT GFS
FUCK MY LIFE
Me being a dickhead is for other reasons. I'm a bad person for breaking up a fight? Where people were getting kicked on the ground and hit in the back of the head? Calling the cops would not have done good here, damage would have been done beyond what there already was.
>Just let them fight what could possibly go wrong?
I can tell you've never been punched.
It would have been more wrong to sit on my hands and watch more people get hurt.
when you climbed on them did you use quick time events?
>Shit white boy lawyer confirmed
When a stranger attacks you or a friend its safe to assume they are going to kill you, my mom was an attorney , and she got this one kid off because two kids who wanted to fight him tried jumping him after school and he stabbed both of them to death.(this was in the bad part of DC though)
want to know how I know you can't throw a punch?
Because fucking someone's elbow up is easy if you can actually punch, when you have someone in an arm bar you can just throw your elbow (and your weight, which is how you hit people) into theirs.
That shit isn't made to go backwards
>When a stranger attacks you or a friend its safe to assume they are going to kill you
10000% wrong basically every state that's not in the south.
Either their were other circumstances at play in your mom's case (the kids said before hand they wanted to kill him or were in a gang therefore making it reasonable to believe his life was in danger, the victim was young, etc).
In a normal case like this where this dummy just witnessed a dude get punched there is no way you're convincing a jury that he should be fearing for his life or the life of dude getting punched unless this guy had brass knuckles or some shit.
The defendant always has the burden to prove that they feared for their life, its an affirmative defense. You don't just get the presumption that because hit you or someone else they were gonna kill you.
>Western Europe, most of whose countries have much tougher gun laws than the United States, has experienced many of the worst multiple-victim public shootings.
>The very worst [school shooting] occurred in a high school in Erfurt, Germany, in 2002, where 18 were killed. The second-worst took place in Dunblane, Scotland, in 1996, where 16 kindergartners and their teacher were killed. The third-worst, with 15 dead, happened in Winnenden, Germany. The fourth-worst was in the U.S. — Columbine High School in 1999, leaving 13 dead. The fifth-worst, with eleven murdered, occurred in Emsdetten, Germany.
Holy shit you dumber and dumber. WTF are you even trying to say? Are you saying that you would put someone in an arm bar then punch their elbow to break it? Are you saying that punching someone's elbow is similar to how you break the arm in an armbar?
Either way you're talking 100% out of your ass and you've never fought or let alone sparred.
Sorry, you already lost the argument. You're welcome to look up your own statistics at this point.
But food for thought:
>For the United States, we used the FBI’s four standard categories for violent crime that Bier cited. We came up with a rate of 383 violent crimes per 100,000 people.
>For England and Wales, we added together three crime categories: "violence against the person, with injury," "most serious sexual crime," and "robbery." This produced a rate of 775 violent crimes per 100,000 people.
New Hampshire, the state with the most libertarian gun laws, where you can walk down the street with a loaded AK, has aproximately the same murder rate as most western European countries, 1.0 per 100,000.
>then she verbally assaulted the guy for like 1 hour and he snapped
That seems legit considering the nature of the contest
>she spit on the people and threw her shoes at them
Statist faggots are all the same, you are fucking retarded.
You are really fucking stupid.
The more you say the fucking dumber you look.
Hitler even loosened up on gun regulation for ethnic germans. You don't know shit. Fucking moron.
>Just because someone is going to hit you doesnt mean they are going to kill you
Are you going to wait until they are stomping on your head? Thats the same bullshit thinking as " just because someone broke into your house doesnt mean they are going to hurt you" and no the kid got off because it was fucking Annocostia Were people got killed for looking at someone the wrong way.
Ethnic germans can be trusted with guns. But how much more work would it have been to remove the Jews and gypsies if they had guns? I mean, the SA and SS would have taken care of business, bunch of civilians with small arms can't do shit against StuGs, but it would have taken more time. Look at the Warsaw uprising.
So we shouldn't arm civilians, obviously.
>Drunks are defenseless
>Drunks don't beat their wives day in and day out
>Drunks don't cause havoc in convenience stores
>Drunks don't take lives behind the wheel
Your bullshit post is a literal example of whiteknighting-- you're talking about only attacking someone who can defend themselves. As if chivalry fucking mattered when some tipsy motherfucker starts threatening a bartender.
You're still wrong. Read my earlier comment. You don't have to take a beating but you don't have the right to kill someone or do a disproportionate amount of damage to them. If someone punches you, you can punch them back. If you punch them back and it KOs them, that's fine. If you then proceed to smash their head against the ground after they KO'd them then you went further than you needed to in terms of self defense. I don't if you mom was a lawyer, you don't shit.
Just because Russia annexed part of your country doesn't mean they will try to remove the government. If Russia takes over Florida we should just kindly speak to them in a calm tone and everything will be fine. Who cares, it's just a piece of land???!!?
nah. never fought, thought i've hard a fair share of dudes try to start shit drunkenly because i was the biggest guy in the room.
I want to get into a fight some day, but i want nothing to do with instigating it or getting into something i have no business in. If i wasn't such an unathletic fuck i would give a hand to UFC lol
>kharak is burning
did you do homeworld remastered? shit is SO cash
Not that dude but I've definitely seen dudes so drunk that I wouldn't hit them. Like if the dude is having legit trouble standing up straight, I'm not worried about him trying to take a swing slow swing at me. I wouldn't throw a punch back when it would only take a slight nudge to knock them down.
Keep in mind though, that type of drunkeness is pretty rare.
Its not easy to KO someone, you should end the fight as quickly as possible And if that means gutting a mother fucker so be it.
>be 9 y/o or so
>brother is 12
>nignog on a bike passing by my brother and smacking him. He did this 3 times now.
>Me being a babby got mad.
>Got a brick and threw it at him from across the street
>Some how babby strength was enough to make it across the way
>Brick lands inside his tire spokes and fucks up his bike causing him to launch forward
>Nignog had no helmet. Scraped the fuck out of his face/head
>Brother ran inside
>been in 13 scuffles because I was the middle eastern shit skin, all self defense.
>Allah watches over me so I havent lost one yet.
>TFW im not muslim.
The UK considers punching someone violent crime. This sneaky rhetoric bullshit with 'violent crime' is too well known nigger. USA doesn't consider the same things violent crimes as the UK does.
So far I did not feel the need to resort to violence but that's because I have been dealing mostly with impotent domesticated rabble, the likes of inebriated students participating in these childish territorial disputes at larger parties and such. The mfd always appeared on the scene (some say almost like out of thin air) to speak words of wisdom over words of violence. My high social standing and incredibly good looks may or may not have aided me in such situations. I can not tell with absolute certainty because. I'm not _that_ attractive. On the other hand I believe it could very well have to do with the way I have with spoken words. I am according to some personality analyzer apparatus on the Internet a natural "ENFJ" which means I can deliver impromptu speeches of which I don't believe a single world but will still have a nation cheering me on much like your negroid president does or DiCaprio in the jewish movie productions of your great country, god bless.
Excuse the conceited ductus I am German and mods deleted my containment thread.
>girls spits and throws her shoes at you
If it wasn't on vision I'd stay with her for hours
Stop it with your cheap tactic. Violent crime in the UK covers a lot mor shit in the US, hence the discrepancy.
Of dyel fags like yourself, no doubt. Still, an OOB is useful.
And I swear, are you just going to post bullshit in every thread today? All your post amount to... filling space. Just talking some random pointless crap.
The fact still stands, the states with the most libertarian gun laws, like New Hampshire, have the lowest crime rates in the union, and even lower murder and robbery rates than the UK. Guns is not the reason for crime. Fucking liberal
Why yes, I do believe the market is self correcting and that supply and demand govern the economy.
>lower murder rates than the UK
Are you kidding? You have 15000 yearly gun related deaths while THE ENTIRETY OF THE EU has just above 600. Figures from 2008.
If you were paying attention those statistics were adjusted for definition. Even your own source agrees with it. They were contesting the much higher 2000 crimes per capita statistic
You are currently in 6 or 7 threads, talking crap. There is no point to it. Its filling space. You just say your opinion or something, then samefag (with trip still on).
I mean... what is wrong with you?
Wut. Aren't libertarians just liberals who are more strongly opposed to state involvement in business? Not that liberals aren't, just look at the whole corn laws thing in England.
If you are unable to derive any valuable information from my writings then that is like Dostoevsky trying to explain to a serf (who magically gained the ability to read) why The Idiot is anything more than a series of superfluous affairs of the nouveau riche.
I was not put on this planet to fix what is disabled I'm sorry.
lel you tard, liberal means leftist in murrika
>Are you kidding? You have 15000 yearly gun related deaths while THE ENTIRETY OF THE EU has just above 600. Figures from 2008.
How's that reading comprehension rate working out for you? New Hamphire has 5 gun deaths per year.
HAHAHAHA oh man, ok. I'll go ahead and take some information about you saying ISIS should form battalions (pointless info), your calisthenics shilling (dyel faggot) and your extremely lengthy bullshit about preworkout that you samefagged and amounted to nothing more than the universally known and repeated 'just drink coffee' that everyone on /fit/ supports.
And that's just the shit Ive seen tonight.
That's not the entire scope of it.
Don't you see that guns are the epitome of equality? Let's do a little role play
You- an aspiring trap, at 5'5" 98lbs, are walking to your car after a late night at Starbucks
Me- a mountain of meat, could shit on you and would enjoy it, decide I want the contents of your fanny pack. I walk up to you, forcefully (or not, it's up to me at this point) take your fanny pack and your eye socket's virginity, and go home unscathed.
If you had a ccw and decided it wasn't worth the risk to just hand over your belongings and used your lawfully carried pistol and put me down, you are in control of the situation.
Long story short: a twink like you should be pro gun to keep the physically strongest from just having their way. Does this make sense? It equalizes power. The strongest aren't meant to rule or enforce, the most capable are. Guns are the thing that the weak can use against the strong when appropriate.
If there are no guns, it won't magically make people less violent, just less able to hurt people with guns. Doesn't mean I won't just use a bat, knife, or hands
After I got swole I nearly killed my ex girlfriend by beating her so bad. I very lucky that I did not get incarcerated. I have been seeing a therapist for the past year and made this comic describing the ordeal to cope with it.
so instead of a greentext i will post this comic
I don't what a New Hampshire is, but it sounds like a way to try and make the USA look better by being myopic.
>liberal means leftist in murrika
Just... how? They're opposites. Liberals want no state control, no intervention in business, individual responsibility. Socialists want state dominated trade and the state to take care of the people.
How do you fucking confuse these two, America?
The fucking law is meant to enforce. Guns aren't equalizers, they're power multipliers. If I have a gun and you don't, even if you're 5x larger than me, I can just cap you in the knee and rob you.
THE LAW should rule. Not individuals. Individuals are selfish and don't see the big picture.
I am so sick and tired of Americans and their gun wank. You have an incredibly violent society with the bhighest murder rates of any western country, but god forbid its related to guns or something. Meanwhile the rest of the west has a tenth the murder rate, and hardly any guns.
>I don't what a New Hampshire is
Rofl you uneducated moron, it's the state in the US with the most free gun laws, you can walk down the street with a loaded AK, legally, yet this state has the lowest gun crime rate.
>Just... how? They're opposites. Liberals want no state control, no intervention in business, individual responsibility. Socialists want state dominated trade and the state to take care of the people.
It's almost the same in Europe now, most liberal parties are just cultural marxist parties who want a little lower taxation rates than their socialist friends. If you were a true liberal who actually believed in those values you are talking about you would obviously be defending the right to defend yourself as well.
If no one has guns, Id be even safer. Sure I migh get robbed and beat (unlikely as fuck, do you know how many cops and CCTVs we have around here) but I can rely on the Law to punish the man who robbed me.
And you're going to say something like 'lol fag the state wont be able to help you' but then we in Europe have waaay less crime than you, so it seems fear of the law works.
I'm a national socialist. Liberal ideas like market capitalism and scarcity are just self evidently how the economy behaves.
I don't believe in citizens arming themselves, because citizens are subject to the state and have the right to protest it through democratic means. Citizens take up arms under the structure of the Army to defend the nation. Not under any other circumstance. An armed citizenry can lead to communists and anarchists rising up against the state.
Just look at Russia in 1917 or Germany in 1919. Armed communists who had to be fought street to street.
has anyone else had another guy who doesn't lit try and demonstrate their strength when they are around you because they can tell you lift? Its some weird machismo bullshit. I let him do it and he pulled his back. oh wow I'm better at something I practice at. Why don't people get that?
>The fucking law is meant to enforce
The law is a phone call and however many minutes away. Thus irrelevant.
>Guns aren't equalizers, they're power multipliers. If I have a gun and you don't, even if you're 5x larger than me, I can just cap you in the knee and rob you.
That's exactly what the fuck I said. If it came to a scrap, I'd be able to kick the fuck out of you (assuming I'm bigger/better/whatever than you) if you have a gun, you have the upper hand. If we both have guns, it's anyone's game. i.e. an even playing field
>THE LAW should rule. Not individuals. Individuals are selfish and don't see the big picture.
I'm not for lawlessness, but they handle repercussions, not prevention or intervention.
Top kek at that whole post
New hampshire isn't a sovereign nation or an international treaty organization, so it means shit.
There are certain provinces in Morroco with 0 murders.
BECAUSE THEYRE IN THE FUCKING SAHARA!
Sounds like classical liberalism to me. Although they aren't necessarily opposed to taxation. Adam Smith thought of it as a great way to increase consumer demand, by redistributing wealth.
Not irrelevant. The law may be late, it will punish. If I kill someone or disable them, the one who gets punished is me. Its entirely excessive to foil a robbery to murder someone. Or end up in a shoot out between two people. Its just stuff. Give him that shit, you have insurance for a reason. Than the law will punish him, because there are 40,000 CCTV cameras surrounding him.
>New hampshire isn't a sovereign nation or an international treaty organization, so it means shit.
Why? Why would be the qualifier? They make their own gun laws, that should be all that matters. Just because you've been proven wrong doesn't mean you can disqualify the argument just because you don't like it. Fuck you you liberal shitstain moronic retard. New hampshire is hardly in a dersert, it ranks as the 21st state in terms of population density.
Murder rates much like suicide rates are not representative of the safety of the average individual.
Rather how much a society allows fringe groups and plain old losers to fuck themselves and each other up.
Unless you live near said fuckups in which case I suggest moving.
Eh, you're severly overestimating the efficiency of CCTV. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9415793/Police-fail-to-solve-three-in-four-crimes.html
>Only a fifth of robberies were cleared up
>23% of burglaries
>Not irrelevant. The law may be late, it will punish.
Punish the person that possibly kills you, yes
>if I kill someone or disable them, the one who gets punished is me.
Yeah it is you that gets punished. And the person against whom you committed that crime
>Its entirely excessive to foil a robbery to murder someone
Who the fuck would kill someone to stop a robbery? You only kill to save lives, not money
>Its just stuff. Give him that shit, you have insurance for a reason.
I agree with the nature of this statement entirely, but it's not always just robbery
>Than the law will punish him, because there are 40,000 CCTV cameras surrounding him.
Look it's not about punishment it's about self preservation. I'm not worried that the guy gets his, I just don't want to be part of the justice equation at all.
>>Not irrelevant. The law may be late, it will punish.
>Punish the person that possibly kills you, yes
>>if I kill someone or disable them, the one who gets punished is me.
>Yeah it is you that gets punished. And the person against whom you committed that crime
>>Its entirely excessive to foil a robbery to murder someone
>Who the fuck would kill someone to stop a robbery? You only kill to save lives, not money
>>Its just stuff. Give him that shit, you have insurance for a reason.
>I agree with the nature of this statement entirely, but it's not always just robbery
>>Than the law will punish him, because there are 40,000 CCTV cameras surrounding him.
>Look it's not about punishment it's about self preservation. I'm not worried that the guy gets his, I just don't want to be part of the justice equation at all.
>Eh, you're severly overestimating the efficiency of CCTV. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9415793/Police-fail-to-solve-three-in-four-crimes.html
>>Only a fifth of robberies were cleared up
% of burglaries
>Murder rates much like suicide rates are not representative of the safety of the average individual.
>Rather how much a society allows fringe groups and plain old losers to fuck themselves and each other up.
>Unless you live near said fuckups in which case I suggest moving.
I'm a fucking Nazi, but yes liberalism IS a pretty good description of economic forces.
New hampshire is irrelevant because it's a tiny subsection of the country. Its like me pulling out an uninhabited province of Mongolia and pointing at their murder statistics
>they make their gun law
Even I know only your federal government can edit the second amandement.
Federal government cannot amend the constitution. This would provide an imbalance of power and effectively give the federal government complete power over state governments. The federal government can begin the amendment process but it must be ratified by the states to go into effect.
You should have paid attention in government class
I agree with the sentiment an earlier anon expressed. You sound paranoid as fuck mate. Maybe its because you do rob and murder each other so much over in the US, but no one here actively worries about being robbed or murdered in the street around here. Its not a realistic concern.
To me, you sound like you're speculating about the zombie apocalypse and are making preparations. I think you're kinda nuts.
I had one friend who would only bully me when we were infront of our other friends until one day when we were 14 he broke into my house I was moving out of and stole and broke the remaining items left behind. He denied it but everyone said he was bragging about it for months.
I've never been one to bully someone but I do have a little leftover resentment against this kid. I'm 6 feet 190 lbs now and he's around 5'8 and scrawny, no doubt I could give him a good ass wooping these days. Is it worth it /fit/?
Whatever mates. You're using cheap rhetoric tactics and can't even use the right definition of political movements.
>look at this tiny part of the whole country to see how we're tottaly not crazy murderers
Its like taking Italy and using Tuscany as an example. Tottaly no mafia here lads! Myopic lies.
I don't think so, Tim.