Do you have Neanderthal genetics? Are you a part of the master race? You need to have the following:
>low brow ridge
>anything except sub-Saharan African (although Neanderthals are most common in Europe)
>making easy gains at the gym
>strong as fuck
Scandinavian here. Although most Scandis are tall I'm really short and naturally strong. Also have a really thick beard and low eyebrow bridge. My first ever OHP was 50kg (which, according to my friends is great for a beginner) and my current OHP is 75kg. My squat really sucks though but I've always had an easy time working out. I also have that lump in the back of the head that only Northern Europeans and Neanderthals supposedly have.
Actually I'm Swedish. And no not really, that would be the case 40 years ago.
Sweden today is turning into USA 2.0. We already have tons of non-whites here. But yeah it really sucks being Swedish and not being tall, but that's why I fuck kebab girls instead since Swedish girls are often quite tall. I'm 175cm fyi
Purity doesn't mean shit
What's funny is that people say "Oh we should mix with other races because Neanderthals mixed with Homo sapiens and that was great!"
The truth is that it took thousands of years to recover from the mix and filter out the bad genes from the Neanderthals while still keeping the good ones
I'm pretty sure I'm the missing link, everyone says I look like a monkey lol
>bridged nose like no other
I'm fucked lmao
Well then you're more homo erectus. The neanderthal had short forearms
You're pretty good looking though where are you from? You look Eastern European. Balkan perhaps? I have a friend from Slovakia who matches your description and looks
homo sapiens at the same time were shorter.
Neanderthals were bigger, stronger and smarter, they just got out-bred and out-competed by homo sapiens. Or at least that's the theory.
Middle East in general is a melting pot
Go to marocco and people are mulattos
Go to Uzbekistan and people are Asian
Go to Pakistan and people are Indians
Go the Syria and people are Caucasian (upper class at least, like bashar)
That is correct.
Why don't you go back to reddit. This is our turf now. The Reichsfahne hangs above the spires of /fit/.
Neanderthal checking in
>5'6 barefoot manlet
>shorter neck than most
>large/wide/thick barrel-chest ribcage
>Always been much stronger than friends as child
>Easy gains without any lifting plan and nowhere near enough protein or total calories
>Had huge traps as a child (people noticed since age 8)
>Broke a kids leg when I was 11 when we both went for leg kick in training, but I was completely fine when though I weighed less. Bones always seemed thick
>Broad shoulders for someone of my manlet stature
>Large juicy glutes without doing squats
I think at this point you're the minority, you SJW cuck. I see more conservative trips and nazi posts than anything else. And people don't even get banned for not keeping /pol/ in /pol/.
But yes, I am in fact just messing with you guys. I'm not a nazi. Just a Fascist.
That's cool we don't really give a shit though. How do you expect to gain support if you're going out of your way to act obnoxious and throw around buzzwords? Makes me wonder if you're jidf disinfo
Just an edgy self hating minority shut in like 100% of /pol/ types
No one gives a sgit about any of this it's literally made up by a dictator sixty years ago to manipulate idiots
You guys are so so so boring
>How do you expect to gain support
What, on 4chan? Not really trying to gain support. Just fucking with people, making shitskins feel inadequate.
In the real world, I don't need to do anything to gains support. ISIS and Boko Haram do enough to push people into our arms.
Nice try Achmed. You're the minority, and we'll make the streets run with your blood if you don't leave of your own accord.
>hitler meaning shit to fascism
Nazism =/= fascism.
>making shit skins feel inadequate
Well you failed since my skin doesn't contain the pigment of shit and I actually feel better about myself knowing there's shut-ins like yourself out and about on other boards making fools of yourselves. Its like you just found /pol/ a week ago and are trying to "red pill" the masses poorly in a haze of patriotic fervor. You lack subtlty and form.
>haze of patriotic fervor
Got that right
Nah, hardly. Ever heard of Pegida?
BTW, even if I'm not posting or being explicit, you're gonna be called a shitskin and ignored on /fit/ anyway. /fit/ might not be overtly /pol/, but they sure are racist. Watch what happens when a nigger posts.
Hah. Sure thing mate. You know everything about me from an anonymous imageboard.
I could pretend to be a girl who likes mlp and you wouldnt know the difference. But nice confidence ya got there, thinking the images you construct in your mind are actually reality.
I'm not a manlet, but I look like one with my overly large chest. My knees are skinny as fuck though, compared to the rest of me.
>I show off my hand gainz by crushing cans top down with my fingers and thumb.
Can you guys stop responding to them?
They are literally thirteen year olds in Midwestern suburban towns trolling you for fun
they don't actually believe any of this shit, you're letting them troll you and also ruin threads.
>you are literally a fan of pseudoscience
Because I've made any scientific claims ITT?
Well, we do by nature mistrust the other and the stranger. That's just evolutionary psychology. Denying that, that is unscientific.
And really, what's so great about completely uncritical acceptance of novelty and difference? Doesn't seem to do much good to me, but maybe you're such a big fan of Jamal's cock that you do see some kind of benefit.
>Midwestern suburban towns
I don't think so, you wannabe European. What is it you lie about being? Irish? German? Dutch? English? Scottish? You're nothing. You're mischling scum.
You've only been offering strawmen so far. Thats kinda funny, accusing others of being idiots while arguing like a shitskin yourself. Ive made no claims about anything, other than me wanting Muslims Raus.
>living in the real world
Enjoy paying taxes to support NEET muslims who want to go off and support ISIS. Thats the reality.
Lel samma här brorsa. Half of my ancestry is Scandinavian from the mainly Swedish-speaking west coast, but both of my grannies are from the now-Russian Karelia. I'm a sturdy, muscular shortstack platinum blonde, but my living grandma looks and acts like a slav gypsy.
Also daily reminder that the gain goblin 'thals wen't extinct in the wake of the ice age and we got topped by lanky cardiofags. The evolution don't need us anymore my fellow primates.
>what scientific claims have I made?
>makes retarded scientific claim
Again, this is all sixty year old propaganda aimed at uneducated morons. You can't reason with a Nazi because a Nazi is an inherently unreasonable person
>hurr I'm a fascist but not a Nazi
No, you're actually mostly just a faggot.
>Enjoy paying taxes to support NEET muslims who want to go off and support ISIS. Thats the reality
Thats FOX news lmao. You're the most ignorant nazi I've seen. You need to take your anger out on the CIA and Obama for training and sending armaments to the terrorists in the first place.
>Why don't you go back to reddit. This is our turf now. The Reichsfahne hangs above the spires of /fit/.
>can't reason with a Nazi
Not a Nazi, just fascist. Nazis believe in retarded shit like an Aryan master race, blame Jews for all their problems, etc.
Fascism is an objectivist statist ideology, with the belief in an ethnic national state. One people, one nation. Its simply the most efficient. Say, a Turkish state with turkish people is in no way wrong or inferior. But Turks in any quantity in other nations fuck up the efficiency and balance. Its undesirable.
>makes a scientific claim.
Outdated? Nah mate. Durkheim, Weber. Read your sociology and psychology, you uninformed fag. Consensus is that people like to associate with their own group and fear/dislike those that are other than themselves, even if only on a subconscious level.
looks like we have fucking hominid broscience now
everyone that's non-dindu shares a percentage of neanderthal genetics, with europeans having the highest average (2,7%)
in my case it is 3,1% for example
large browridges/thick beard/big ribcage are present in all healthy european men
That has nothing to do with nationalism. Nationalism is a part of fascism, but Nationalism doesn't say how one should order the state. Just that one should love their country and fight for it. It doesn't say "blind obedience to the state, the state guides itself by the volkswille".
Yeah, I know it's Italian. Germans just made it more efficient and worked out the kinks. Than latched a bunch of Völkisch bullshit about Jews onto it and created Nazism.
Their terminology is still the most effective, but maybe thats a question of taste. It sounds the best to me.
At least our global recognition evolved from a cultural and a genetic wasteland between two world cultures into a projected nuclear wasteland between two world cultures during the Cold War.
Och btw kan ja ha en jobb och en brud inom nollåttan tack? Räcker med en halv-blatte från Söderorten bara hon har enorma pattar och tål äkta finsk alkoholmissbruk.
This is my point. You ate regressing to your animal self. Your lizard brain. Civilized people are able to overcome their initial mistrust or fear of different cultures; you are a retarded man-ape who's scared of what you don't understand and are proud of it. The perfect kind of idiot for propaganda to work on.
>scared of what you don't understand
I am around Muslims mate. They live here. I see them. I interact with them. I admit I don't understand them. I don't understand people who cover their women in sheets, avoid alcohol and sex and go off to fight for their retarded religion in the hundreds over in a sandy hell.
>but those people don't exist!
Like 10,000 Muslims born in Europe serve with ISIS currently. There have been 2 major attacks in 4 months in the EU. Many more attacks were foiled. Pro-ISISI rallies have been held in the fucking Hague.
But yeah. It's just some irrational fear man, no logic behind it whatsoever.
>zero random and mostly unrelated haplomap spam
K u fucks let's do this shit. Hurr it's a graph look mum imma scientist durr.
>Facism is tyrannical.
That is precisely why Fascism is better than nationalism. Nationalism results in American shit like Waco. Militias that distrust the state. Mass shootings.
Fascism creates things like the SA and Blackshirts. All efforts directed to the service of the state, and thus the improvement of the people.
Meh, ville bara blanda engelska och svenska eftersom man är på 4chan. Bor själv utanför Uppsala så finns extremt få invandrare här. Pluggar på historiska institutionen i Uppsala.
Men fan att det ska vara romer som tiggar utanför varje ica och coop, hoppas att de utvisas snart så man kan gå in och köpa kvarg utan att bli bombarderad med tiggare.
A logical problem arises.
You say mixing held back the development of homo sapiens. Held back relative to what? Africans are pure homo sapien, and look where they are today: poor, uncivilised, undeveloped. So if anything, mixing with neanderthals seems to have had an accelerating effect on human development.
If the above is true then mixing with Africans today would be bad, as that would only further dilute the neanderthal dna in our blood.
Neanderthals weren't superior in EVERY way. Like I said it took thousands of years to filter out the bad Neanderthal genes due to mixture.
Africans have some good genes as well, such as high endurance and long limbs. However, there are some other genes such as low alcohol tolerance and aggression that will take a long while to filter out from the gene pool (in fact, so long that humans will probably be extinct by then).
Mixing can be beneficial but it takes time for it to be good. Also, many people assume that since inbreeding is bad, mixing must be good. Here's the thing: outbreeding is just as bad. Mixed racial children have mental problems and identity issues more so than their pure relatives. However it's also time to remember we are more genetically similar to Africans than Neanderthals, so it isn't bad to mix in the same degree.
Just my unbiased opinion.
Funny how this discussion with just a bare three posts in total is more well formulated and logical than anything you see on /pol/
/pol/ are just nazi 12 year olds like the other nazi in this thread
Neanderthals weren't superior in every way but clearly the mix Neanderthal + Homo Sapiens has produced better results than pure Homo Sapiens alone. Your assertion that it "it took thousands of years to filter out the bad Neanderthal genes due to mixture" is a huge . If those bad traits had such an impact and held back development then you'd think the pure Homo Sapiens would be doing much better than the mixed ones. They clearly aren't, unless you measure progress solely by being the best at marathons.
Are you looking for a true Neanderthal man in our midst? Look no further.
Look at that hand. Do you feel in charge, Sapiens?
I didn't say it wasn't beneficial, I'm just saying it took a long while to fitler out the bad genetics (which it did). Humans mixed with neanderthals about 50,000 years ago. The first high civilisation came only about 6000 years ago I believe. Africa has a shit enviorment in general for civilisation to start with exception for Egypt and South Africa (which wasn't populated by sub-saharan africans to begin anyways).
The most beneficial gene the neanderthals produced was better immune system and better adaption to the cold (which is why white people absorb vitam D better in cold enviorments... And if you can't do that
Also, the intelligence and civilisation came much later than the interbreeding. The reason people with neanderthal admixture are doing better is probably not due to the fact that they are part neanderthal (as always, correlation does not imply causation) but because they live in a good enviroment. The Indus valley civilisation is where the Indo-European civilisation came from (hence, "ancient aryans").
"Both research groups also found that some regions of the modern-human genome are devoid of Neanderthal DNA, including areas involving the testes and the X chromosome. This suggests certain Neanderthal mutations were incompatible with modern humans and were removed during evolution, perhaps because they reduced fertility, both research teams said. Reich's group also identified Neanderthal-linked gene variants associated with the risk of diseases such as lupus, Type 2 diabetes and Crohn's disease (a chronic inflammatory bowel disease)."
These are less common now than 5000 years ago due to the fact that those without the disease survived. Natural selection at it's finest. It's really that simple, the bad neanderthal genes (such as short figure, which is why northern Europeans are really tall) have been filtered out (the latter probably due to sexual selection).
(cont.) and one of the sole reasons civilisation never spread to sub-saharan Africa was also because the Sahara desert made it difficult for civilisation to spread over. There were some high cultures, but as always with small connected civilisations, and bad enviorment, they never reached any good level of developent. And which type of people survived in these areas with low civilisation and tribes? Yup that's right, modern day Africans. They are less civilised because their ancestors haven't adapted to civilisation yet. It takes time. Maybe one thousand years from now, they will be on par with Scandinavia, whom also were uncivilised one thousand years ago.
TL;DR Niggers aren't civilised because their ancestors didn't have civilisation which is because civilisation never spread to sub-saharan Africa due to the Sahara desert and bad enviorment among other things. They really dindo nuffin
>I didn't say it wasn't beneficial, I'm just saying it took a long while to fitler out the bad genetics (which it did). Humans mixed with neanderthals about 50,000 years ago. The first high civilisation came only about 6000 years ago I believe. Africa has a shit enviorment in general for civilisation to start with exception for Egypt and South Africa (which wasn't populated by sub-saharan africans to begin anyways).
You're absolutely full of shit. So 50000 years ago the mixing happened and then 6000 years ago civilizations started springing up... in which way does this indicate that the mixings held back the mixed Homo Sapiens? If it did we'd have seen purebred Homo Sapiens build better civilizations and sooner but we didn't. Not any that'd last anyways. As you've said, even the ones that were built on their continent weren't made by sub-saharan africans anyway. You destroyed your own argument. Good job.
Also your citation proves nothing at all. I never said there were no adverse effects at all, just that it was overall better and didn't held us back. It propelled us into prosperity. You once again can't see the forest for the trees.
>They really dindo nuffin
Well I can see your "unbiased opinion" showing through. You just can't bring yourself to admit that mixing was beneficial because you're afraid that'll cast africans in a bad light. Pathetic. It's useless to discuss with people like you.
>You just can't bring yourself to admit that mixing was beneficial because you're afraid that'll cast africans in a bad light. Pathetic. It's useless to discuss with people like you.
It was bad in short term and beneficial in long term. It's really that simple. And no, neanderthals didn't have an advanced civilisation or were smarter than the average homo sapiens back then (Contrary to popular belief, they were actually on par with humans in intelligence).
>in which way does this indicate that the mixings held back the mixed Homo Sapiens?
Because it took 44000 years to your superior neanderthal genes to affect humans. Neanderthal or not, the civilisation around the indus valley would probably have sprung up anyways due to the perfect climate. Neanderthal genes were beneficial yes, but they didn't support intelligence (however I do believe some of our language gene comes from neanderthals).
>If it did we'd have seen purebred Homo Sapiens build better civilizations and sooner but we didn't.
The purebred homo sapiens didn't build a good civilisation because the climate in Africa is dogshit like I said. Civilisation is only born in good enviorments (keep in mind I said BORN, not SPREAD) such as around rivers (the nile, indus valley, etc). The only good place for civilisation to be BORN in Africa is the nile, which coincidentally, the only African high civilisaton was that was born is. For example, Scandinavians didn't build their own fucking civilisation. It was SPREAD there. Scandinavia is actually shit-tier for civilisation but it worked because Scandinavia was connected to the rest of Europe and it spread there.
And fucking topkek, I've casted blacks in a terrible light, but you seem to think that I'm suddenly an SJW just because I don't argue in favor of your niggerhating attitude. If I didn't make it clear enough; blacks aren't civilised genetically and are in fact inferior in many tasks such as concentrating and discipline.
Also, I recommend "Gun Germs & Steel" by Jared Diamond. I know /pol/ hates it, and although I don't agree fully on his opinions about that the environment is the only thing that affect human performance (because face it, blacks are adapted to be tribal hunters, not civilised people) it still gives a lot of insight into how environment affects us. Blacks evolved separately because they were in a shit environment, same with aboriginals. It's as simple as that. Or is it a coincidence blacks and aboriginals both have barely any civilisation at all when they both live in the same climate, despite being not closely related?
actually homo sapiens cucked the neanderthals, a neanderthal man was sterile when fucking a homo sapien woman, however a homosapien man could fuck a neanderthal woman and she would be knocked up with the half breed baby
also, homosapien women couldn't give birth to a half neanderthal child without splitting open, due to the neanderthals head size at birth (which never happened because neanderthal men were sterile).
23andme said I had 3% Neanderthal dna which put me in the 90 something percentile
Im kind of short but I have wide shoulders and a somewhat prominent brow so I guess it makes sense
>yfw you realise the beta revolution already began when the homo sapiens revolted against the neanderthals