WHO PROVIDES GOOD TECH NEWS THAT ISN'T FUCKING /g/???
I'M TIRED OF THE SAME 10 THREADS EVERYDAY WITH THE OCCASIONAL NEWS.
YES I'M YELLING WHERE DO I GO???
IS HACKER NEWS STILL GOOD???
This is what you get for not listening to
What exactly am I looking at here?
There's hardly enough relevant news to keep up with. Chances are if if's important, you've heard of it.
If you're interested in learning more about computers, teach yourself and read more of the "classics" instead of trying to keep up with news churn. You won't learn anything by reading 100 shitty lifehacker articles a day.
Here's a smarter guy making the same argument
I love donuts, and so also the people who make donuts. (Krispy Kreme is tops.) Donuts can be “part of a balanced diet” as they say; eaten in moderation, donuts can make your life better overall. Nevertheless, if I made donuts I might worry sometimes that I was tempting folks away from a balanced diet, to eat too many tasty donuts.
Similarly, as a blog author, while I realize that blog posts can be part of a balanced intellectual diet, I worry that I tempt readers to fill their intellectual diet with too much of the fashionably new, relative to the old and intellectually nutritious. Until you reach the state of the art, and are ready to be at the very forefront of advancing human knowledge, most of what you should read to get to that forefront isn’t today’s news, or even today’s blogger musings. Read classic books and articles, textbooks, review articles. Then maybe read focused publications (including perhaps some blog posts) on your chosen focus topic(s).
Of course you should allow yourself some breaks and leisure. And my blog can be part of such leisure. But never confuse leisure that makes you sweat with work.
ncix, pocketnow, cnet, the tek, and sometimes ign
>giving a fuck any more which site gives you the latest about vidya
i stopped a while back
i don't go to leddit anyway but i'm going to have a look since that dude reminded me
anyway what are you going to lose?
jsut don't take part if the ledditors bother you that badly. if you're only there for the news why the fuck care so much?
yeah, as long as you dont read it for the articles there.
They are (and always have been) shit.
Also about 1-2 days late.
But the comments are really amazing.
Ars is THE tech-site.
The deepness of some articles is simply stunning (deep not as in philosophical-artistic but rather in detail).
The comments are usually also great.
Plus: Snowden liked the site too.
Minus: Since this is well known, by visiting it the NSA will but you in a Database somewhere.
>The six tech policy problems Congress failed to fix this year
Doesn't look like a good site. List x number of things why y thing is z are bad clickbait sites aimed at women and luddites.
for actual tech news, i read zdnet and ars technica with some techdirt thrown in for cross-blogged articles.
for devices, i like engadget, slashgear, and vr-zone. the chinese site is good for newest release info from manufacturers.
I get review and computer part info from techpowerup, legit reviews, hardware canucks, tomshardware, overclock3d and hardoc.
other than that, i always read ocn for anything that falls between the cracks.
yeah, also on Ars right now:
(4 pages, all text)
(Also 4 pages)
(only one page)
(also 4 pages)
Please not that each of those stories comes from a completely different "departement", so its not like "5 things the congress didnt fix about IT this year", "Other failures of the Congress" and "Legalese for the beginner"
Also each page is acutally full of text, not 3-sentences clickbait just to maximize the ad-revenue.
ars was so much better before Condom Nasty
I miss it
for entertainment purposes only ofc
occasionally they have an interesting perspective