>>45381184 It is legitimate if other people refer to gratis software as free software. If we're referring to free software, we can make it clear that we're referring to software that respects the users' freedom. If people are getting confused about what I'm saying, I like to use "user freedom software which is software that respects the users' four freedoms in free software".
>>45381389 Your freedoms as a developer to distribute the software is still there. What you should not do is distribute proprietary software. Proprietary software is immoral as it causes users to be helpless and divided.
>>45381162 That's technically true. English being a retarded language is something you can't change. You can keep stealing words from other superior languages (like gratis is starting to appear on English dictionaries online for this same reason) but that doesn't change how fundamentally flawed this clusterfuck of a language is; it even makes it even more of a clusterfuck because of the added pronunciation exceptions derived from stealing from other languages.
>>45382123 >Implying Spainiard >implying stealing a word from an already established language to fix shortcomings is the same as basing a language on another and developing from it from the start >literally spent hundreds of years dealing with the ambiguity between free and gratis >tries to argue back with red herring Embarrassing.
>>45382254 >re-purpose words from the historical lingua franca of western europe >uhhh we have similar words in spanish for a long time stop stealing from us Are you actually this stupid or just putting on a good show?
>>45381423 >Immoral to distribute proprietary software It is immoral to stop someone being able to make a living. If they suck at other stuff, but they be a good codemonkey, let em shill, I say!
On a more serious note, you might wanna hide the red at least a little. That's like saying I can't sell/own a house or I can't sell you a cheeseburger. People do things so they can do what they want. If you have no form of leverage, nothing will evar fucking get done. Look at the US these days: We fund faggots on Welfare but we cut back NASA. I actually just had a discussion on part of this. NASA gets downsized, because stupid Obama and his Democrat-led Congress wanted more Welfare for the Majority of Minorities we have.
I can bring this up here, because my argument is that we aren't super-funding scientific and technological research on every scale from easily-applicable to ridiculous-but-breddy-cool, because we're too busy funding assfuckers on Welfare.
Now, what's this have to do with "gratis" software, again? Simple, the concept that you think it's wrong to sell intellectual property makes you one of those Commie bastards stifling the entire fucking planet's technological growth.
I'm not saying you MUST SELL it, because to say it's wrong TO SELL it is, innately, wrong. This is the tech board, you all should be fucking disgusted by the idea of this commie-moral of free software (as you guys use it - the concept itself is harmless, until you take it as Free vs Evil. No, it's Free vs Non-free AND Good vs Evil. They are NOT innately the same thing).
Take Facebook, for example: they are evil by almost every possible corporate standard, but i's free to sign up. You can even use AdBlock to block all but the suggested posts. See? Free AND gratis, BUT evil as fuck, because they're an ethical blackhole who takes and uses your information. They're also evil, NOT because they're a monopoly, but because they do NOT use their monopolistic powers for good purposes.
>>45382279 >implying you'd have stolen those words if they hadn't been in active use by a popular modern language >implying stealing words from other languages to fix shortcomings that existed for centuries isn't embarrassing regardless of circumstance >still trying to change the subject by bringing up the fact spanish is based on latin >conveniently ignore the fact libre isn't even a word in latin, if you had used latin you'd have used liber instead Are you even trying anymore? It's time to just give up, if you had to resort to namecalling you're just being desperate. >>45382299 >WAS >not IS Exactly my point. Bravo. >an evolution of it >not it Again, exactly my point. Good boy.
>>45382327 Not bitching about using our words, just about how shitty the language is and how it needed to do it in the first place. Borrowing words from other languages is common as common can be, I won't argue that, we borrowed a lot of words from English. But no words to avoid distinction between free as in free speech and free as in free beer for hundreds of years? Embarrassing.
>>45382330 >used liber instead First of all, "liber" already exists with multiple meanings in English. Why adopt the same word yet again when we can adopt a less-used variant? >shortcomings Advancing (not fixing as you suggest) a language is done by expanding the lexicon to suit constantly evolving instances. New words don't appear out of thin air, thus you borrow an ancient word or coin a neologism to fulfill that need. When your native language has a word stock with even a fraction of the depth of English, I'll be impressed.
>>45382393 lel Case in point. >>45382402 >Why adopt the same word yet again when we can adopt a less-used variant? That's exactly my point. You're adopting SPANISH, not Latin. >constantly evolving instances. >implying the distinction between freedom and free as in free beer is a new concept derived from a consantly evolving instance. Jesus Christ.
>>45382422 Why does it matter that it's specifically Spanish? Are you seriously getting so rump ravaged over a single borrowed word?
>Free lunch, originally offered in bars to draw in business, by 1850, American English. No idea where you pulled this "centuries" shit from, I guess your ass. Free has always primarily meant freedom, in almost any circumstance. The problem is that in the context of software, which most consumers with the consumerist mindset think of as a product, then of fucking course the meaning would be interpreted as "no charge" instead.
>>45382507 >Why does it matter that it's specifically Spanish? Why do you just jump into discussions without reading the previous messages to get the context? It does NOT matter it's specifically Spanish; I was arguing with that guy about how it was Spanish because he kept bringing up Latin. The point I made it very clear here >>45382349 Funny you mention me bringing info out of my ass when you make retarded assumptions without knowing the context of the conversation and then get mad about it; >in almost any circumstance. Exactly. There's always been ambiguity and people have always had to guess from context, free software only made it more evident and conflictive.
>>45382645 No there hasn't always been ambiguity, in fact, the exact opposite is true as I stated. Free means freedom in any context outside of the the consumer market. That's my entire point. You're talking about a specific scenario that's only shown this ambiguity recently in history and then complain that they didn't have a distinction before the problem existed in the first place.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at email@example.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.