It's early infernal restraints, model is cherry torn.
Seems like I have a unusual skill. Identify bondage models in postage-stamp sized gifs.
What do you know? I've got another from that set.
if you like it, yay for captions, if not, just crop it out
yes, she isnt wearing chastity, but it gets the job done. read the caption
hoping these aren't duplicates of something above
>>613583 was 17
starts 3 of the same model in a row
she faked one too many orgasms... now she doesn't get any
we gotta work out a better way to dump...
just nod if you can hear me
is there anyone home?
and now things will slow down, because there are no more number captchas
just the basic facts, can you show me where it hurts
my moobs want to try those out
and seriously? anyone out there
thats it for tonight more tomorrow or the night after
Maybe. It would be even hotter if the vibrator had a remote control. That way I wouldn't know when or where it would be turned on. Imagine it going off at the shops or in the most inappropriate places. I'm trying to get my boyfriend to be kinkier but I think he's shy. Baby steps.
Do you already do S&M? If so, just be blunt and talk to him about chastity. Men tend to respond to sex talks best when it's completely upfront. If not, that's a whole different process.
Do it. Seriously, my ex boyfriend kept me locked up for around a year and a half and it was incredibly hot. I wasn't belted the whole time; I got let out every few days for cleaning and whenever he wanted to use me for sex. Can't help you on how to breach the subject, though, because it was his idea :/
We were pretty deep into D/s at that point; I addressed him as Master when we were alone and we did all kinds of games; stuff like he would make me ask permission to use the bathroom or not allow me to use the furniture so I had to sit on the floor. One day he told me he wanted to control all of my pleasure, and I thought that was kind of cool. It started out just wearing a belt throughout the day but eventually I was in full bra+belt, not allowed to touch myself for any reason, let out only when he wanted sex. After a while you'll go kind of crazy; no orgasms for weeks combined with constant pressure of the belt on your pussy will make you horny pretty much all the time, which if you're already in a D/s relationship means that you're in slave mode all the time. I wasn't allowed to ask for sex or else I'd have been begging him 24/7 during the long dry spells.
There's holes around the pussy. Some belts perforate down there, others leave a big gap and have a secondary piece of metal locked over it. It's still hard to pee without making a mess though; one of the reason girls have to be let out of chastity pretty often. Periods are a nightmare.
Enjoy the suffering ;-). Guys can stay chaste a lot longer than girls can. Way less need for maintenance.
>we did all kinds of games; stuff like he would make me ask permission to use the bathroom
Why is this so hot? I do this with my girlfriend/slave; I've got a raspberry pi connected to a servo motor mounted on the bathroom door so I can lock or unlock it with a command on my phone.
One time she had to pee before bed, but I wouldn't let her, so she went to bed holding it. Then, the entire next day I wouldn't let her go until she eventually had to piss herself. So incredibly humiliating.
Tease her, deny her, play games, basically just torment her and make her want sex as badly as she can. Don't keep her completely unstimulated the whole time; take her close to the edge but don't let her orgasm. Make her earn her unlocks. Stuff like that.
>>619140 here, one thing we'd do was gamble. He'd lock me up, give me some amount of time chaste, but then we'd play poker or blackjack or mini golf or whatever and bet time. He was a better gambler then me (plus part of me wanted to lose) so that tended to keep me chaste longer, but sometimes I'd get out early that way. One time we played a game of high stakes poker with another couple who was into S&M; the other girl wasn't into chastity so she was betting whippings. My ex ended up winning; the other girl got 40 lashes and I was belted for three months. That was the longest I ever went and I was literally humping his leg by the end.
Another thing we'd do is give me a set time, like two weeks or something, but add extra time or take time off based on things I could do Make excellent dinner = minus one day. Give mediocre blowjob = plus one day. Or I'd get belted with no unlock date at all and I'd have to earn my release; we played with chastity for a year and a half and during that December we played a game where starting the 1st, I had until Christmas to earn 30 points. I got a point for being a good slave girl, and the count went down by one ever day so I had to be exceptionally good if I wanted to make a profit. If I couldn't make it to 30 by Christmas eve, we would have sex that night and then I'd be locked until Valentines Day. I made it, but it took until christmas eve on the dot!
Like I said earlier though, we were pretty hardcore D/s at that point, so you're not going to want to jump into the deep end immediately (or probably ever). Just do games and tease her a lot. Have sex but don't let her cum, make her beg for orgasms, indulge her fetishes so she gets super horny, stuff like that.
You could tie chastity into the RP! Give her a "test", and every question wrong is a day in the belt and a smack to the ass. Do a scene where she's in danger of failing so she gets belted until finals week, and if she fails the final she has to stay chaste until next "semester".
Typing these memories is actually a lot hotter than I thought it would be, so here's some more.
During that three month period after I lost the big poker game, we kept playing games but since release was off limits we played a points game where if I got too low I had to do really humiliating slave stuff. Like the christmas game I lost one point every day no matter what, but I could gain or lose points based on games or actions. When I was in the negative, he would dominate me in little ways; not let me wear clothes at home (except for the bondage gear!), attach my collar to my knees so I had to crawl, make me walk on tiptoes by attaching a squeak toy to my heels (-1 point for each squeak!), etc. I would go up in points for big humiliations; one time I got down to -10 due to some REALLY bad bets so he suspended daily loss and made me sleep in a cage until my points got back up to 0. Then I can't remember what I did but I got a big loss and he was going to gag me. Being belted, gagged, and caged was just too damn much and I safeworded out and we stopped the game for a while.
I safeworded out of chastity a few times too, but not during the big poker loss. It was kind of a challenge to see if I could do it.
That relationship was fun. We'd kind of waver in and out of D/s as our interests waxed and waned. Sometimes we'd both be out of it and would be indistinguishable from any other couple. Sometimes one of us would be in the mood but the other not, so we would do little half-assed bondage or something. Then other times we'd both be into it and things would get very crazy very quickly. It ended due to entirely non-sexual things.
I think that figuring out just what is likely will eat more time than likely earn any.
Plus with a rolling key like that, it is much faster to check combinations in order than input an entirely different one every time.
/hc/ - Searching Algorithms
PS: >>628940 is right, for a sequential-access storage device it makes more sense to do a linear search of all elements then to attempt any kind of prediction. Were the lock a random access storage device (like a lock with a digital keypad) it absolutely would make sense to do a dictionary or pattern based search, but the overhead of doing that on a rotating cylinder would be too high.
Probability of having sex in a given day tends to go up during marriage compared to casual dating. The hollywood idea of lots of sex then none after the wedding is simply not true, and most women report a greater orgasm/sexual-encounter ratio after marriage then before. Meanwhile, men report significantly greater sexual satisfaction in committed relationships than in casual relationships.
Turns out that if you make only having sex with one person a big part of your life, sex with that person tends to become very frequent and very good.
>Being belted, gagged, and caged was just too damn much and I safeworded out
This is always the biggest downer move in bondage games. The sub's at her limit but situations occur that make it so the dom has to increase something or the game would break, but increasing anything breaks limits. Catch 22. Me and my girl do off and on 24/7 and this comes up a LOT. If anyone has a solution I'd love to hear it.
>4 digits? 9^4
Let's be fair here, 0 counts so it's 10^4.
Not doubting >>629166's theory, but that form of lock isn't sequential access I/O. It's random access to 4 separate sequential access I/O devices. If we let M=2, that lock is
For M=4 it's more complicated, obviously. This is making me wonder what algorithm would produce the least overhead when we consider that while greater shifts take longer, that time delta is tiny compared to pull -> shift -> pull times.
>Let's be fair here, 0 counts so it's 10^4.
The guy above just presumed that the rotation goes from 1 to 9, without zero being an option.
And anyway it boosts the time to about an hour.
>Not doubting >>629166's theory, but that form of lock isn't sequential access I/O.
But it is. You rotate them all to 1111, flip the last digit nine time while pressing the button, flip the tens digit once and repeat the cycle with the last digit, and so on. You don't touch the first two digits for a long time.
>It's random access to 4 separate sequential access I/O devices
No, it's sequential access between 4 seperate sequential access devices. Delta(1,4) > Delta(2,3). That said, I think a straight sequential search from 0 to N would be the best choice, but I'm not sure. I've never encountered two-layer sequential access data before.
Judging by the size of the cylinder and marks on the rings, it only has 1 to 9.
Well the straight sequential search gives an absolute upper bound - 6561 shifts (and that's a shit of just one digit for one position), 6561 pulls.
Although wait, the shift when the upper digit is affected will be two shifts, so that's plus 729 shifts.
On the other hand, you may adapt a bit and start winding the first digit up and then down instead of always up, neutralising that extra.
>Although wait, the shift when the upper digit is affected will be two shifts
That's the point. We're dealing with 2D sequential access; a shift from 1999 to 2000 means moving finger from 1 to 2, from ring 3 to ring 2, from 9 to 0, from ring 2 to ring 1, from 9 to 0, from ring 1 to ring 0, and from 9 to 0. 7 actions to achieve 1 unit of increase.
The optimization problem is thus: how to achieve the lowest average action count per increment?
Okay, for starters, counting down decreases the number. You go from 1999 to 2999 with one switch and then count down 2998, 2997 to 2000, switch to 3000, count up, so on.
and same for the smaller steps inside of the thousand.