Hello /his/, in light of all the Holocaust denialism; why not formulate an opinion over the Nuremberg trials and WW2 in General? I believe it is presentable that the Nazis were unjustly tried by a court where they were allowed no evidence, and accused of multiple things they did not do as proven by later exoneration. There are two specific articles that are important to the trials, article 19 Article 19 states: >The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence. It shall adopt and apply to the greatest possible extent expeditious and nontechnical procedure, and shall admit any evidence which it deems to be of probative value.
This is apparent as it is stating any evidence can be submitted as long as it helps /prove/ what the Nazis did, not that it is confirmed or valid.
The next questioned is Article 21, lets look at it. Article 21 states:
>The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.
This "common knowledge" provision has been used a few times recently in courts, but for this preceding it was use as "the holocaust" was common knowledge, so the Nazis could not even argue weather or not they had done their committed crimes. Nor allowed to submit evidence in opposition to what they are accused of, much less go and gather it. Later, the Nazis were exonerated for their crimes accused at Kayan, where the Russians brutally murdered 22,000-30,000 polish officials and intelligentsia. Even during the war Hitler called in the Red Cross to record the event as a Russian massacre, and it was, and they were not allowed to submit it in court. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre
>>44195 So you don't care if it was just or a proper court hearing or proper trial, you just care if "Nazism is ended once and for all"? Because I don't think it holds up that "Nazism is stamped out", many far right or alt right parties grow larger by the minute, and the alt right has been the biggest threat to the establishment recently.
The next thing that we could talk about is the Night of the Long knives Here is a copy pasta written long ago:
The Night of the Long Knives has been severely distorted by mainstream history. Yes it was a political purge, but it was only ever meant to be two men: Ernst Rohm, and Franz von Papen. Also Stalin's political purges numbered close to a million, whilst Hitler's came to a meager 81 (80 of which he did not order to be killed)
When Hitler came to power in 1933, the SA was rendered largely superflous, as they had assisted his rise to power tremendously,... Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
ITT: The most based characters in history. God mode: we outmatch each other with each post.
Giuliano Della Rovere >Escaped from many assasination attempts >Persecuted by the Borgias who were the most powerful people of Italy at the time >Came back several years later to reclame the Pope's throne >Stood by what he thought was right and never gave up no matter what
A thread for cool stuff near you. Post pictures, tell stories.
Back in 1793 the British government decided to try and devalue the Assignat by flooding the economy with fake bank notes, in order to make the war against Napoleon easier. They commissioned several paper mills in remote parts of the country to make forgeries, then sent them to Flanders with the Duke of York. One of the mills is just down the road from me. I might explore it some time.
>>43461 Russians were the only ethnic group who got to benefit from the the scientific and philosophical revolutions of Europe while being independent. The other Slavs were already taken over, and the Tartary of Siberia had no access. Before Russian Expansionism, there were plenty of Khanates, but they all fell apart.
Can we settle this once and for all? Were Egyptians ethnic Africans?
My understanding is that Egyptians comprised primarily of Greek, European, other levantine and Mediterranean peoples which would make them "olive". At some point the Persians invaded which is where we get the idea of Egyptians as Arabs.
Did Nubians ever contain anything in Egypt politically?
This a thread for the discussion of that most legendary English monarch, the once and future king, the man we call King Arthur. It is also for the discussion of Camelot, the Round Table and the Knights that sat there, and the politics of the court.
Topics to kick off discussion: >What's your favorite Arthurian romance? >What's your favorite historical analysis of King Arthur? >Does your country have a cultural counterpart(s) to King Arthur? >Favorite... Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Know when to quit. Settle for something like the Sudetenland, Danzig, and Alsace-Lorraine, establish new and genuinely independent governments with troop restrictions in conquered territory. Offer a peace Britain can accept and peace out.
Problem was that Nazi ideology wasn't about revising Versailles, but about genociding/enslaving eastern europe and dominating western europe. No one else would accept that, so they got dragged into unwinnable war after war.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.