>>70619 That is literally the worst case scenario for the MG. You would want a choke point so when you reload the legionnaires would trip over eachother. If it were an open field all they have to do it flank it and the battle is over.
The romans would win in every circumstance except an absolutely perfect setup for the machine gun for this context, like if the terrain was completely open and flat.
A single gun is still a single gun. You can't fire it in several directions at once. You can't even pay attention to all directions at once. Meanwhile a few thousand dudes can come towards you from all directions.
>>73465 If your soldiers have only ancient era weapons it would be easier to flank a single machine gun if the terrain had a lot of cover instead of being flat. The choke point thing would be great but only if you could absolutely guarantee that they all have to go through it for some strange reason, which seems very unlikely seeing how their enemy is one singe machine gun.
>>73780 I think I see what your saying about the flanking but by choke point I mean an area sealed off in all directions except for something like a narrow pass, something where flanking would be absolutely impossible without managing to flood the area
>>73892 The problem is that if your force is only one machine gun you have no way to guarantee that the romans aren't going around the narrow pass somehow. There's nobody covering other avenues of approach for you, you're just a single machine gun.
>>70619 You're retarded buddy. Your complete ignorance of basic warfare knowledge doesn't help either.
Even if the Romans weren't heavily armored with the best armor of their era, a single MG probably couldn't take down 1000 naked Romans (An open field even gives the Romans the advantages), let alone 5000 or 6000 armored Roman troops. This thread is also retarded.
>>74103 He's right if you ask me, actually. An open field gives the best chances to the machine gun, since the machine gun's only strength is that it obliterates every roman it hits. So it has to cover all directions around itself. If it's not an open field the romans can sneak up on it and kill the gunner instead.
>best armor of their era Wouldn't do shit even to stop modern rounds. In fact, it might just make the wounds worse by forming shrapnel.
A single lucky shot could punch straight through the roman shields, and then continue to pass through several armored breastplates, killing their wearers, before stopping.
>>74945 That would be silly, but a single round could definitely kill several dudes if they were positioned so it would go straight through them in a line. You know, if they were in a shield wall formation for example.
>Nobody in this thread understands heavy mg tactics In ww1 they figured out if you try to shoot directly at an advancing enemy line you're liable to hit only 1/20 or so targets with simple mowing pattern. If, however, you place the my to the side of the formation you get a much narrower and target dense area. This increases your kill ration to about 1/3. An open field would be the worst possible situation. The only chan the mg has is if you have terrain like thermopolae or a doorway where there is literally one avenue of approach through which the entire legion is bittlenecked. Otherwise the legion would simply charge and close the gap before you could even kill a hundred of them
I mean if you brought a machine gun back to 50 BC or whatever it would probably freak the Romans out so much that they would run away. But if they knew what to expect, or were ready to fight to the death, they could close the distance pretty easily and then it would be over.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at email@example.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.