[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Archived threads in /ic/ - Artwork/Critique - 119. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network issues. Refreshing the page usually helps.

Made this in ms paint when i was using a mouse
what kind of painting would this be considered if it was painted on canvas?
15 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
a greasy one
>a greasy one
So something painted in this style would be on canvas with oil? I can imagine that and I think you're right

File: moonlanding.jpg (1 MB, 2349x2373) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1 MB,
I wanted to draw a space scene, but I think I'll have problems with the way light works in a zero atmosphere environment. From my knowledge, all the rules of making distant things seem distant are due to light being scattered by the air, ex. lower contrast, desaturation, misty appearance. If I wanted to create an image of a ship in outerspace, would there literally be zero bounce light (except off the ship itself) making shadows pitch black?

Would a space scene even be visually appealing? I feel like you wouldn't even be able to see what the fuck is going on.
13 replies and 2 images submitted. Click here to view.
If there is no atmosphere you won't get atmospheric perspective, no. Very distant objects will still be slightly darker since the amount of light bouncing off them is spread thinner the farther you are from it, so less light will reach you. Shadows will not have any ambient sky light filling them, but may have some bounce light from the ground or other objects that fill them slightly--see the image you attached where the cast shadows on the ground are black or near black, but the shadow on the legs of the space...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
It's weird to think that there are only a handful of people who have seen the moon with their own eyes. Since a camera can make the lighting look slightly different and whatever.

>tfw you'll never be able to draw lunar landscapes while actually being on the moon

But anyways, just make your space art look cool, no one really cares if it's scientifically accurate unless maybe you're illustrating for some science magazine or something. Which I dout you are
You'd fucking see bright assed stars but don't ask NASA why there are no fucking stars because they're not going to say "set and we couldn't fake star positions exactly because the math is too hard"

File: image.jpg (148 KB, 1280x879) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
148 KB,
I wanna learn how to cartoon like this guy. Do I just read Loomis like the sticky or are these other things you'd recommend? Spoonfeed me plox.
12 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
start learning anatomy to the point you break everything down into easy to manage shapes and then just stop
Like figure drawing classes? Got any books?
it doesn't really matter which book you use imo it's more about paying attention and memorizing how each part of the body looks and connects together once you have a good knowledge of anatomy you can distort it to achieve any style

File: mmmcherrsmum.jpg (294 KB, 1500x702) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
294 KB,
Last thread: >>2308175
Post your current drawing here and give constructive critique to others!

Please make sure your posted image is clear, downsized to around 1000 pixels wide, rotated to the correct orientation, and that any unused space is cropped.
If you want critique on a drawing from the previous thread, you can delete it there and repost in this one.

>dA /ic/ group :

>/ic/ Resources/Reference/Downloads/Links:

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
309 replies and 120 images submitted. Click here to view.
File: study.jpg (87 KB, 629x1002) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
87 KB, 629x1002
Not really used to doing studies (or working from reference in general..), but decided to finally force myself to do some!

Any tips/critiques?
File: ref.jpg (124 KB, 661x989) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
124 KB, 661x989
Here's the ref I used
File: Taming the beast.jpg (259 KB, 660x1080) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Taming the beast.jpg
259 KB, 660x1080
I've had this idea in my head for a while which is an alien technology that is often boxy mixed with smaller elements of Giger esque curves. No displays or visible sensors but there would be many analogue switches and manual cranks and things that look like they're meant to be operated by something that's not human.

Its propulsion is based around these like, movable magnetic plates or something that suck in air between them, hyper pressurize it and then blast it out the other end.

Anyway, I'm just faffing about with some designs before I actually...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1437287528529.jpg (199 KB, 736x1515) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
199 KB,
Beginner Thread

Because we should not have to make new threads or post in draw threads with our fundamental exercises. Feel free to post even the smallest exercise you have done to show you are still trying, do not give up.

Do not forget to resize and crop your images before uploading them. 1kpx is fine.

→ → → → Before asking "what should I read/view/study/learn," consult the sticky: >>1579290 → → →

Questions go in the QUESTION THREAD
This is for posting...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
329 replies and 96 images submitted. Click here to view.
File: face study v2.jpg (58 KB, 706x1000) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
face study v2.jpg
58 KB, 706x1000
From the old thread. How does this look, am I on the right track?
Would drawing images from anatomy books then trying again from memory count as a good exercise? Doing that with Bridgman Drawing from Life.
No. Focus on getting proportion right with your drawing first. Don't forget to match the background value as well otherwise your subject's value will be off. For hair, focus on the whole thing by squinting hard. After squinting the value is about as dark as the background and only slightly lighter than her hoodie. The only light part appears at the top, not the individual strands on the side.

Hi /ic/.

I'm drawing and painting basically my whole life and I'm pretty good at it. Anyway, I noticed that I fuck a lot of my paintings up because my drawings have absolute shit tier proportion. It's easier for me to keep proportions straight when I'm drawing on a very small space, but when the space gets larger (even DIN A4 is difficult when I'm actually trying to fill it), I just fuck things up. Now, my usual approach would be to try harder, but I'm 100% self taught, so I guess there may be more systematic approaches out there that I'm...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
16 replies and 7 images submitted. Click here to view.
draw the whole loosely, look at it from afar, correct the proportions.
>look at it from afar
This. Use the navigator window in photoshop, or if you work traditionally step back and view it across the room.
>I'm drawing and painting basically my whole life and I'm pretty good at it
>my drawings have absolute shit tier proportion

As for your more systematic approaches: read sticky.

File: _iA0WjVvm40.jpg (108 KB, 563x604) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
108 KB,
What do you like drawing the most? Men or women?
34 replies and 5 images submitted. Click here to view.
Men for sure. I feel like there's more opportunity to add definition and detail, and a little easier to make unique faces.
women, because muh dick
I believe gender does not exist, therefore I like to draw genderless blobs of hair and skin

File: image.jpg (56 KB, 310x200) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
56 KB,
Does anyone have experience with this?

How hard would it be to rip the videos and save for personal use. If it's not too difficult I'd be willing to share their videos with you, my fellow d/ic/ks.
61 replies and 10 images submitted. Click here to view.
Don't share them. Rip them using a screen recorder, but do not share them.

As for the site itself, it's OKAY, it needs work though.
>Don't share them.
They have a watermark for every user
they will find out and send you to prison.

File: 2191634.jpg (611 KB, 1280x1656) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
611 KB,
does anyone have a guide to breast size,refereces etc.

cause drawing up characters and googling the sizes,i get results from washboards to bumpercars all when i look up just one size
53 replies and 21 images submitted. Click here to view.
google some boob tutorials, nsio did some good one I think.
not going to spoon feed you
my difficulty does not reside in the matter of drawing them but more as references for them.
was simply asking if theres a website that has models of various labelled bust sizes or anyone has an image reference chart or something of the sort.
cause im only drawing blanks when i search

File: SPARTH.jpg (365 KB, 1500x955) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
365 KB,
Here's a list of artists that have some great portfolios. This list is not complete and it would be great if /ic/ decided to contribute names of artists that deserve recognition for their work. This list focuses on artists who have shown a clear understanding in the technique and dedication it takes to hone their craft. As a result, creative and alternate artists have been left out.

*Above Average

+On Art Station

Jae Lee*
Alex Ross
Nicola Scott
Simon Stalenhag*
Marko Djurdevic*
Kenneth Rocafort
Francis Manapul
Travis Charest*
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
14 replies and 4 images submitted. Click here to view.
Sergey Kolesov/Peleng
This is ideologically driven total nonsense list of dog poops with severe judgmental complex and one giant baggage.
File: KIM JUNG GI.jpg (317 KB, 927x629) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
317 KB, 927x629


Kim Jung Gi
Ruan Jia
Nivanh Chanthara
Olly Moss
Sebastien Kaczorowski

File: CVzTNFXUEAAk8eM.jpg large.jpg (168 KB, 1024x1375) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
CVzTNFXUEAAk8eM.jpg large.jpg
168 KB,
>tfw you will never be this good
32 replies and 6 images submitted. Click here to view.
Why not?
I don't sculpt though.

Also is it just me or is it a little creepy? Like imagine if you were that girl and you saw this picture online where some weeb in his basement made a wall of photos of you then sculpted you out perfectly.
because i am an unmotivated shithead that can't develop a habit to actually fucking work on my craft if my life depended on it. i am a failure.

File: sky_girl copy.jpg (154 KB, 623x900) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
sky_girl copy.jpg
154 KB,
Last Thread:>>2300208

This thread is meant for artists who might want to try to make stylized work in-between their studies. It is strongly recommended that you use this thread in conjunction with learning the elements and fundamentals of art. You can also discuss the visual elements of various professional artists as well if you keep it relatively articulate and civil.

Submit your drawings, receive feedback or critique others! Share your knowledge and remember to thank those who've critiqued or red-lined your drawings....
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
312 replies and 96 images submitted. Click here to view.
File: rinchan2.jpg (206 KB, 750x1050) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
206 KB, 750x1050
>what tool do you use for the perspective? Want to begin doing this kind of stuff but I'm not sure how to manage the perspective.

I use this.

Also, reposting...

I think you should show the bottom of the head a little. idk as it stands it looks like her head isn't properly connected to the neck.
The buildings need variation.

Not him but thanks for sharing that too.

File: image.jpg (986 KB, 3264x2448) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
986 KB,
Draw/paint a picture of yourself, then post it. Easy.
308 replies and 94 images submitted. Click here to view.
File: Sad_self.jpg (966 KB, 2550x3300) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
966 KB, 2550x3300
File: ohlookajewish.jpg (315 KB, 1056x1353) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
315 KB, 1056x1353
Spent about 8 hours on this using water-soluable oil paints on 18x24

Been painting since september and this piece has already been critiqued by my instructor but I haven't had time to work on it with my other classes. The one thing he didn't really critique was my colors, so if you see anything that looks off there please let me know.
das pretty shit senpai desu

File: primary.jpg (7 KB, 288x288) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
7 KB,
Where do i get acrylic paint in London. Preferably only primary colours. Also, what are primary colours exactly. ive got some christmas red and its shit for mixing
17 replies and 1 images submitted. Click here to view.
>Where do i get acrylic paint in London
fucking google it
>what are primary colours exactly
fucking google it


Every art store in London should have acrylics?? Have you even tried to look for any art store?

As for primary colors, I usually use cadmium red, preussian blue and lemon yellow.

File: posturart.png (179 KB, 640x424) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
179 KB,
If you're an artist and a critic tells you to work on your anatomy, then it is solely the critic's opinion that your anatomy needs work. There is no work of art so great it has forever silenced critics.
If you're a critic, start by stating the obvious. There is no need to waste time nitpicking or being creative with your reply. "Does this person know how to draw?" should always be your first thought.
History has deemed the artist notable, and if you wish for history to be so kind to you, you must at least acknowledge the artist's work survives some measure of time.
Criticism by another name, is consulting. Consulting is not free. If you ask "what is wrong with this?" then save the critic some effort and state what you already know is wrong with it.
"Is Rembrandt a good artist?" is a stupid question.
"Is Rembrandt a good artist? I think so." is a statement.
"Is Rembrandt the worst artist of all time? I think so." is a blog post.
"Is Rembrandt the worst artist of all time?" is food for thought.
23 replies and 3 images submitted. Click here to view.
"You suck" should be replaced with "Your work sucks." It's terrible criticism nonetheless, but at least know you are dealing with human beings, not art machines.
Good criticism = "Consider the following."
The critic must acknowledge that the artist will never gobble up even the most valid of assertions. Even if the person takes your advice, they will harbor some resentment towards you. Never...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
All you need to know is Loomis, and needs more Loomis.
File: 129265366270.jpg (24 KB, 356x367) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
24 KB, 356x367

Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160]
Pages: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151] [152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] [159] [160]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Other sexy stuff] [Home]
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Other sexy stuff] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at wtabusse@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.