I've seen the chart before. It's nonsense. All of those citations and sources are either from the 1980s or from anti-gay pro-family groups like the FRC. These exact stats I believe come from this group: https://carm.org/statistics-homosexual-promiscuity
Is promiscuity a problem in the gay community? Sure. Do gay men have hundreds of sexual partners? The vast majority do not. Per year the average gay man has between 2-3 sexual partners per year
>The mean number of male sexual partners MSM reported in the previous year fell significantly from 2.9 to 2.3 between the two surveys (p = 0.035) and was more marked in men under 24 years old (mean 2.9 to 2.1 partners, p = 0.027). The number of partners also fell in men aged 35 to 44 from 3.0 to 2.2, though this was not quite statistically significant (p = 0.07).
>>5174186 >Are you this dumb? Do you even need to take the time to check the provided source? holy shit asshole, I think the question is ARE YOU this dumb? When my friend first showed me this chart I literally said "stopped reading there" after quoting the 1000 sex partners thing. I didn't post this chart in defense of the chart, I posted it here because I think it's total bullshit. Now if you would excuse me? I would really like to not be harassed.
Literally every citation that chart gives is from like 40 years ago. And it's pretty much all bullshit. Like >>5174199 said, when you actually look into each individual citation it's done by places with agendas or just simply out of date an irrelevant.
I don't know why anyone cares about this shit anyways.
>fags have aids, fags that fuck a lot get more aids
Woopty fucking doo. This isn't the media boogie mans fault, it's the CDC's fault. They have drugs that are proven to prevent HIV transmission with 100% certainty, they just don't talk about it or commercialize it because they're scared people will stop using condoms.
So instead of people contracting easily curable STD's they'd rather let fags get aids.
Absolutely nothing to do with the media what so ever, though.
>>5174364 >It has a christian source so it's wrong Wow you pointed out that in one of these cases, it was a Christian source. And sources specifically targetted to promote faggotry probably aren't twisted I assume?
Here's another source for you, straight from the CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/
>>5174371 Are you implying I post this every single day? Because Im not the OP.
And funny, last time I checked only neolibs give a shit about muh feelings and not facts.
>>5174403 >Are you implying I post this every single day? yes you are the only person in the history of legbutt to post that image on this board even though i just said it gets posted daily congratulations
>>5174403 >Wow you pointed out that in one of these cases They're ALL biased sources. For instance the one that says gay men live 20 years shorter lives on average is immediately a red flag that shows the entire chart is nonsensical. If you are diagnosed with HIV tomorrow you will live a life that is JUST as long as if you weren't diagnosed with HIV tomorrow.
So that's two claims made by this chart that I've looked into for this thread and both are fucking ridiculously wrong. Almost comically incorrect in fact. But go on, keep using it as a source on /pol/ and posting it every time a thread about homosexuality comes up. Because it doesn't matter to the stormfront idiots what is actually proven and true.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at email@example.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.