>he can't briefly outline 20th century developments in the french social sciences
>billions of names of actual academics with big meaty thick girthy quantitative research bibliographies you could cite
The kindest interpretation of this green text I can give would be the way people bandy about names like lacan or foucault. I suppose in a sometimes snooty way. However, I can't even truly commit to this because critical theorists aren't social scientists. Also, based Latour OP.
>subhuman french scum still haven't been sent to the gas chambers
>this thing is not actually like how you think it is
>it is actually this way
>or is it?
>up to you anon :)
>also pls don't accuse me of being pedantic or just making shit up, you're ridiculous!
This French shit goes sooooo deep lol
Most of the shit that comes out of the French continental tradition and social sciences in general is just posturing and their own half-baked theories without any grounding in reality.
>make this thread as a joke
>mfw it accidentally reveals how stupid /lit/ is