>Been almost 100 years
>no form of prose or poetry has even come CLOSE to dethroning pic related
faulkner's avant-garde style is great. faulkners traditional writing is just terrible. i often wonder if his abstract writing is only good in comparison to his traditional prose.
this novel contains all of my observations.
>implying he's not one of the greatest writers of all time.
Can you all stop le trolling my small intellect for 5 min and tell me what the fuck i'm supposed to see in this book besides incest. read it and didnt enjoy it. just fapped, constantly. this book is shit because i read hemingway.
You're supposed to jerk off to his corncobby prose rather than the corncobbing.
Faulkner's mediocre though. His reputation is massively overblown. Nabokov was right when he dismissed him.