>Dostoevsky, Fyodor. A prophet, a clap-trap journalist and a slap-dash comedian. No one takes his reactionary journalism seriously.
Do you agree with our boy Tao?
Could you imagine knowing some guy and recommending him one of the badly reviewed ones like dosto and him just saying that shit? Dont know if id laugh or want to punch him in the face but either way id probably keep him at a distance.
>id totally would keep track to see if hed write a book though desu.
I think he was wrong, yet still holds a point. He does say he is criticizing him with the ideal being very great writers, but i think it still falls short (or maybe rather too far). Sure dostoevsky stuck a lot to emotions, barely ever describing landscapes or settings or whatever. He did write strong emotional stories, true. But what is wrong with that? Sure he is not like some others but he's definitely not to be aborred in the slightest. His stories are really worth reading, and not because "they're just barely worth it".
Yeah, watching the dfw movie rn and i would think that nabokov is an autist (not literally but you know what i mean) just like Wallace.
Btw: who else is annoyed by pic related's typecast character? Dont know if thats how he really is or not but damn shit gets annoying after a movie or two.
>that protrayel of wallace
>hurr durr why does x matter
this is the shittiest reply for anything on 4chan. clearly people want to discuss this. do you suggest that people stop posting just because you dont care about a topic? fuck off, retard.