>>7327426 >>7327427 >faggots need only one book to focus in on It's a question which various books have reached different conclusions on. The reading list you need to have completed to participate in this thread would be exhaustive to compile, so kindly do not participate in the subject if you cannot name at least two.
>>7327433 So, did you side with Kant, Mill, or Hume (or any other work) in this matter, or are you an illiterate faggot who needs to go to >>>/his/ for thinking he can post without having read a fucking book?
could you stop with the "if it's not about a book, go elsewhere", that's just stupid. content on this board shouldn't be ONLY about books, but about ANYTHING concerning our society and the soul. why? because people who read books, usually have more insight and knowledge on this matter and therefore, the posts are more enjoyable. and if you can't comprehend that, please do kill yourself. >fuck the rules, the users make them
>>7327569 There's literally nothing to argue, Schopenhauer lived with a woman that had many lovers besides himself and even humored her with marriage from time to time. The only reason why he didn't marry her was because she had a daughter with another person and the plague broke out.
>>7327573 >The only reason why he didn't marry her was because she had a daughter with another person and the plague broke out. It couldn't be he'd already written >Marrying means to halve one's rights and double one's duties and the even more humorous to marriage >Marrying means to grasp blindfolded into a sack hoping to find an eel amongst an assembly of snakes. >plague Do you mean cholera? Schoppy used get some serious PTP, so I don't know what you're on about.
>>7327590 Schopenhauer really never listened to his own philosophy, if you read his biography you'd know this yourself. As a matter of fact, I'm sure there's a quote from him in Wikipedia where he justifies himself, something about a sculptor shouldn't be asked to be as beautiful as his work-piece. He also has a quote saying he was more fond of woman when he was young and would've had them had they had him. And again, he humored Caroline Richter, and would have married her if she didn't have her daughter. Though he might have made the move knowing she wouldn't abandon her daughter, he offered her to escape Berlin with him if she did.
>>7327600 >something about a sculptor shouldn't be asked to be as beautiful as his work-piece. Isn't that usually in reference to his enquiring around nothing rather than aspiring to it? >>7327600 >he was more fond of woman when he was young and would've had them had they had him. Some of them did turn him down. However, he fucked more sixteen year olds than you have. >>7327600 >And again, he humored Caroline Richter, and would have married her if she didn't have her daughter. So, if a situation which wasn't real had happened, he could have gotten married in order to actually get keked? I don't think that's keking m8, I think that's not marrying chicks with kids when you can bang them for free and leave when cholera hits.
>>7327609 The point is, Schopenhauer had a woman he loved, and she had many lovers at the same time which he didn't seem to mind, so he's clearly a kekold and should be disregarded along with other kek "philosophers" such as Stirner and Russel.
>>7327641 I've never been with a woman before. Just because you don't know how to articulate your ideas without using meme vocabulary that's been diluted to such an extent that the word cuc|k has become nebulous doesn't make me interested in that fetish.
Go back to /pol/ and talk about how much you love big black dick or whatever.
>>7327650 The reality is that you're being obtuse, you might think you're being clever but anyone with half a brain would know what I meant by the word kek, but you'll dodge because you've no argument to hold on but semantics. Anyone wise would be... wise to pick up on what I said about Schopenhauer. Don't read philosophy written by keks. Resist this moral decay.
If when I used the word kek, you didn't think the idea "a man whose lover sleeps around" didn't come to your mind, you're bullshitting or stupid, which means this entire conversation was a waste of time.
Pretty funny that you think you know anything at all, especially with how enthralled you are with Academia where no philosopher worth his salt stood in line with them.
Either way, you're definitely stupid. The word "kek" was used in the correct context here, where even if Schopenhauer remained a bachelor the general understanding is having a lover who sleeps around (and yes if you checked 4chan use of it you will see this is true), unlike your laughable attempt at making this seem like a "humpty dumpty language defense" which if you actually knew what it was, it's changing the definitions of the words until the meaning is so far and away that it has nothing resembling its real meaning, which is nothing at all what I'm doing here when using kek in the common lingo around here.
>>7327725 Okay, then how about I take that back and I call Schopenhauer a "Guy that had a girlfriend and loved her while she still fucked other people despite being in a relationship" from the beginning? What then?
Nope, I'd be absolutely right. I called Schopenhauer a kek, and that was the meaning I intended when I used the word. Whatever follows from there is this argument of whether a kek means what I said it meant or if it's the classical meaning in the dictionary. Unless you're going to argue that whatever I said is untrue, which isn't, I can't find the exact book but it was something like "Philosophers gone bad" or something like that. There's also a section on Nietzsche and his obsession with fruit.
just because I'm not a "guy that has a girlfriend that fucks other men while in a relationship with me" or don't condone that type of behavior doesn't mean I watch soap-operas
Well, if you want to listen to the philosophy of a person that had his girlfriend sleep around while being in a relationship, by all means go ahead, after all Schopes was popular with the French, so I'll probably guess that pessimists and people that enjoy their lovers and wives fucking other men have something in common.
>>7327753 >"bla bla bla" you said nothing about me being wrong :^)
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at email@example.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.