sure. doesn't look too hard to draw. covers that are just written words (i.e. that new Drake album) also count, as long as the writing looks rushed and unorganized
also i love that album so it counts twice
I like this one alot better than the non-japanese one too
do digital doodles count?
if you could make something of similar quality in less than, say, 5 minutes or so, it counts. it's mostly a matter of objective thinking; you know, "could i draw this with little effort"
>not posting the superior super autist release
you can get carried away while doodling you know.
And hasn't gotten anywhere because it sucks. I saw your thread yesterday. You're fucking pathetic man. I never liked your music but I was like "hey, cool this little indie project is getting notoriety" but then you do that and fucking pissed on mine and probably others respect for you.
"It's c-critically acclaimed!!!". Yea, because the average critic isn't a dribbling uninformed idiot. Nice how this post and the one before keep bringing up the fact it's three years old. Real subtle in appearing like different people. Also how does that change anything? If you have a tendency to viral market because you're desperate for attention and you're still going three years later there's no reason why you wouldn't still be attempting to viral.
>"That album sucks dude."
>"It's SEVEN years old you fucking IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!"
What, where did you say you've never heard a single song by them? All I got were suspiciously defensive replies telling me the album was "three years old".
All that makes it seem like is you tried to find a /mu/tants last.fm to appear legit and then try to backpedal an explanation into it.
Can you play a song for me right now? A band starting with the letter R. Then I'll believe you and fuck off