Serious question, where should the padding be when you wear clothes with chamois? Should my shaft and balls be buried within or not even touching the pad at all? Is my asshole where the thick part of the pad should be or is it my taint that needs the thick part?
Didn't use bike general because fuck you, no one uses it.
I can't post pics on this device but if you look up 'sit bones' you should get some pics of a pelvis and you'll see where the two large bones are and they should be where the two large pads should be.
Another method is to place the chamois over the saddle (while you're not wearing it). You'll see that the chamois is roughly the same shape and size of the saddle. Then sit on the saddle (with the chamois still draped over it) and you'll get an idea of where what goes where.
Sorry if I'm not making sense, and please disregard the train autists in this thread. /n/ would be such a nicer and more active board without them.
Which means they die too soon and then people keep asking the same questions rather than simply using Ctrl+F to find an answer to a similar question.
Typical dumb foamer can't think things through.
That doesn't even make sense.
BQG keeps being alive and getting bumped until it hits 300 posts, and autosages and falls off the board when it reaches page 10.
Hundreds of stupid question threads get bumped for an hour at the most, then fall off the board.
Already, right there, anything in the BQG thread is going to have more longevity than a stupid question thread because it gets bumped.
Now add to the equation that a flood of stupid question threads bump the old stupid question thread off to page 10 even quicker, because of the increased number of new threads. So having multiple stupid question threads makes the lifespan of the answers as an available resource even less.
Stop being a faggot and use the general.
This, if you want reference materials, longer threads lead to higher post density on the board because the number of posts active on a board at any given time is determined by the number of total threads, not the number of posts in a thread.
>Stop being a faggot and use the general.
Fuck off cunt. Consolidate your foamer threads into a general. There's no reason for more than one train thread to be going. There are only so many things that you could discuss in relation to trains. That's why 1chan is so dead, and that's why you are here. Only now you're trying to kill /n/ by shutting down the cycling threads. They're the only thing keeping /n/ alive and you're doing your best to kill them. You are killing /n/. You literally are cancer.
Seriously, is the only thing you can do is accuse people of being a foamer? Like the majority of /n/, I'm a cyclist. /n/ has lots of cycling threads. One of them is a general for stupid questions like the OP's. OP willfully ignored the fact that a general exists specifically for this kind of thread, and I suspect you're really the OP and you think you're some kind of special snowflake.
Pretty sure the OP is a foamer trying to start up controversy again. Note that the OP's image is not an original image, neither is >>788857 and >>788858 has nothing to do with bicycles. It happens every now and then. Foamer starts a false flag operation to justify his hate for everyone not into trains.
Don't mind me. Just bumping a cycling thread to maximize foamer butthurt.
Thanx for playing, btw. Keep dancing, my little foamer puppet.
Hilarious, more prime evidence of quality contributions to this board by cyclists.
Protip: No one needs to false flag your retarded asses, you are all insufferable enough on your own. And apparently paranoid too.
>44 replies (so far)
>implying this question would have recieved even half that many replies if it was posted in the BBQ thread
More proof that individual cyclist threads improve the board by generating traffic for site sponsors and advertisers which feed more money into the system which enables the site owners to afford and maintaing better servers and internet infrastructure, thus improving the site as a whole.
Cyclists in charge of saving the world.
>Didn't use bike general because fuck you, no one uses it.
It's obvious this is a false flag, because OP knew about the BQG and mentioned it, and claimed no one uses it despite the reality it is the most frequently used thread on the board, followed by the bike buying general. Anyone who was actually a cyclist and actually used the general would also know it is one of the most active threads.
Clearly the OP is complaining about the influx of stupid question threads not using the general, and using that as the basis for claiming no one uses the general, and attempting to add to the shit. Because anyone who has actually looked at the general can see the general is used quite a bit.
Therefore, the only kind of person that knows about the general, but claims no one uses the general, is someone who doesn't use the general, but notices people who don't use the general. In other words, a foamer.
Are you attempting to eradicate train threads on this board by claiming these bike threads are false flags by foamers and then getting people to post even more bike threads to drown out train threads on this board entirely?
Well guess what, we see through your lies and you aren't going to get away with this. Quit false-flagging railfans while claiming they are false-flagging you.
I have all the answers you need.. but you're not getting them from me, because you're a rude, crude asshole of a person who sounds like you should be punched repeatedly in the face, so fuck off figure shit out on your own, dickhead.
>I have all the answers you need..
No you don't.
>but you're not getting them from me,
>crude asshole of a person who sounds like you should be punched repeatedly in the face,
>so fuck off figure shit out on your own,
Why so rude?
I'm guessing because OP said:
>Didn't use bike general because fuck you, no one uses it.
Normally if someone asks a question like this they're directed to the general, but the OP flat out refused.
The latest BQG is currently sitting on page 3. Maybe OP was onto something.
>Maybe he should have bumped it?
Was that a question? why are you asking questions in a thread that isn't a questions thread?
See, I can play the autist too. That's literally how autistic the "GOTO GENERAL" fags sound.
>QUESTIONS GO IN THE QUESTIONS THREAD
OP communicated himself quite well. If you didn't understand him then that's your problem. Maybe you need to work on your comprehension skills.
Throwing a hissy fit when something doesn't fit into your self imposed set of rules is an industry-recognised symptom of OCD-related autism.
Well okay then. Apparently you think all anons are the same or something. I'm pretty sure why anon got mad at you was because you were kind of being a douche about not using the general, not because of any strict routine that must be followed. You don't see this kind of posting in threads where the OP isn't a dick.
>Apparently you think all anons are the same or something.
>anon got mad at you
>because you were kind of being a douche about not using the general
Good job. Your irony earned another reply!
I'll let you have the final word now. Entertain me!
OP was refering to the first two posts in the thread. I suspect he had his eye on the unique IP count and determined that the two posts came from the same person. That's what he said.
You seem to think that everyone other than you is the same person. You're delusional. Borderline psychotic.
Generals are nice cause kids that visit no other sight than 4chan & don't know how to type a question into google can be corralled there. It's not about permanently answering ppls questions on an cartoon based Chinese imageboard. It's about reducing clutter that don't need to be their own threads/discussions and answering questions with a bit more efficiency on a relatively slow board. I'm not even a trainfag I'm a bikefag and I get this.
If you want to be pro, tuck your cock and balls inside your anus. The padding just goes wherever after that. It just keeps everything out of the way reducing chafing and it give better cushioning for your taint area. It is de rigeur in the peloton man.