They came from a site called Humanphenotypes.com, that's currently out of commission. It's based on old Anthropology books, generally from the first half of the 20th century. The creator of the images learned about all the racial types identified by old anthropologists, picked examples of them, both from the books and from other sources, and combined them to create composite images. This is considered a pseudo-science by most anthropologists today (the same ones who say that race is a social construct), but there are many hobbyists who consider it a legitimate science as well.
I can't tell which one of the nordic types I am.
I am literally a combination between Faelid and Atlantid which makes total sense as my family is one half French and the other half Austrian, German. Same face structure as Faelid but with olive skin, blue eyes, and medium brown curly hair.
Try actually looking into the camera and take a descent self-portrait, nobody can determine your race based on a poorly lit half-arsed selfie of you looking down into your fagphone.
I've been wondering if these exist with a high sampling rate. Not just a football team or something but maybe up to 100.000 people for a single image.
Shouldn't they be able to scrape some facebook/ID-card photos for that purpose ?
How many people make up a single face in these pics ?
I believe it's 10 faces per picture, all excellent "textbook" examples. Getting a huge mass of images and sorting them out wouldn't be ideal because such a large portion of people are a mix of two or more types, or they just have very atypical features due to individual mutations.
Actually, you should have buttblasted me because I was wrong. Looking again, the Irish are Atlantic Nordid or whatever. I find that very attractive and I've always said they look like some Spanish too. Especially the men. Quite rugged features but with a broad brow and distinctive eyebrow set, very vivid blue eyes, black hair and extremely pale. I read somewhere once that apparently they're all celtic peoples and that they Irish apparently originally moved over from the Iberian peninsula so that makes total sense they'd all look very similar.
Amazing to me. I don't know why this stuff is considered 'racism'. It's literally living history staring you literally in the face.
Anyway, like this? She's "jewish" though apparently.
The Irish aren't any particular phenotype. For the last time, these phenotypes are not the same as countries or ethnicities. Irish people could fall into many of the different subraces shown in these charts.
a) you're handsome but you know it so quit being a big head and keep focusing on your personality
b) you're either mixed race
c) you could actually have some Scottish blood.
I've seen a lot of Scots who have dark hair and eyes and I put it down to Italian immigrant influence OR there is actually a type of brown eyed/brown haired celt.
So either those or the asiatic sense could be a mix or you are some sort of upper northern european like Finnish or something. Again with the almond shaped dark eyes and so on.
>>31899429 I know, but the idea is that the mass makes it. Some faulty pics shouldn't distort the result that much. Maybe it would defeat the purpose of the previously posted pics but I'd be more interested in that.
m8, you're actually retarded.
Indo-Iranian includes Afghan, iranid and nord indid types.... and Dravidians are a different category of caucasoids all together.
>no veddoid type
Hah. So not too far off. There's a give away in your bone structure more than your features which made me think you're definitely a high amount of European somewhere.
So yeah, the Norwegian makes sense. I'm sure they can run the range on dark eyed and haired though and I still think your eyes are likely more northern than they are necessarily asiatic. A lot of Finns etc have that sort of eye set. Related. And actually some Scotts too whch makes sense because of their proximity to the region. Or people like the guy out Aha although I don't know where he's from. That area around there anyway.
So yeah, less your dad than I think you might think. Maybe your colouring to an extent but your features otherwise are actually quite fine which I usually see with Nordic types.
Has anyone ever told you, you look like a supreme gentleman
She's said before that she's not got anything unusual and both her parents are Icelandic.
I've seen loads of Finns that look this as well. Dark haired, dark eyes, asian type eyes. Then the other extreme of very blonde, very broad faced, blue eyes etc.
So something happened. Either someone moved over from Asia or there is a type of celt that is brown haired and brown eyed because I've seen a lot of Scotts like this too.
Germanics and Celtics are blends of various Alpinid, Nordid and Cro-Magnid (Faelid, Paleo-Atlantid, Borreby) peoples. There is not much of a genetic difference between Celts and Germans (Exemption: Island Celts) and they're more cultural boundaries than racial ones. Even so, historical tribes like the Vandals had elements of Celtic and Germanic culture.
They're a Caucasoid/Negroid blend, but for the purposes of these charts we need to put blended types in one or the other.
Yes, they are Negroid, just not Bantu
True, but it's stupid to have a separate Capoid chart with just 2 types on it.
Borrebies are generally not very tall, due to their aplinization/paedomorphism.
But they usually fight well, you see the stereotypical "overgrown baby" look often in boxing and MMA: The Guv'nor, Chuck Liddell etc.
Austrians are rarely Faelid, it's more of a North Euro thing.
But it's not impossible, I'm southern German and look like a mix of Brünn (Irish Cro-Magnid) and Nordic.
Also, fun fact: American hero figures are often Paleo-Atlantid, i.e. dark haired Cro Magnids. Batman, Superman etc. have this look.
>This is wrong, the Borreby is considered a tall type
No. Faelid types are generally tall, Borreby and Brünn less so.
But height is not really a racial trait and has more to do with childhood nutrition so whatever.
Oh really? Because I've met a few Austrian people and when I mentioned about my grandmother they said oh yeah, you look Austrian.
My features are actually quite indistinct. Average sized eyes, quite broad and high cheekbones, but round faced (which is why I thought Faelid) and generally quite "soft" looking. The only thing that's noticeable is my skin colouring which is olive and then blue eyed and my hair is brown and curly so I know that part for sure has to be mediterranean. But no, you could be right. Maybe it isn't Faelid. It was the only one that sort of "looked" like my face shape. Mother with french father and austrian mother, and father both french and swiss german parents.
Then you're alpinid. Faelid has a rectangular face, and if you look stereotypically Austrian, you're not Faelid.
Source: I'm Bavarian, in other words, I spent most of my life a few miles north of Austria.
Well then you're better able to say than me. That Faelid woman really just grabbed my attention straight away because she's almost the spitting image of both my mother and grandmother (maternal). Right down to that chin/jaw combination.
Anyway, thanks for the clarification.
On the topic of UFC fighters
Alexander Gustafsson, what do you think he is?
i asked this yesterday nut left before i could see a response- all my dads half of the family fit the "iranid" type pretty much spot on, but we're all british without any foreign heritage- anyone know why this might be?
Looks like Hallstat Nordid for me, but I know for the origins of my both my mother's family and my father's family are Frisia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia). My mother's side is West Frisian, and my father's side is North Frisian. So which Caucasoid race should I be according to this? Both families and me are all completely blond and blue-eyed.
You lost a little bit of weight since I last saw you in this video
Unless someone has obviously come from one of those countries and you all just don't know about it. But then again it's some kind of celt if not. Scottish with dark hair and eyes or even Cornish. I've known a lot of very "swarthy" Cornish. I don't think celt automatically means fair eyed and haired, etc. I think it covers quite a big range.
But then again, maybe someone came from that region and you just don't know. In my experience in the UK, English can actually be pretty broad and then it starts to get more distinct when you get into Scots, Irish, and the Welsh to a lesser degree (they're more like English broadly).
Being born with upside-down eyes makes this hard.
the thing is we're from the south-east mainly, its definitely not about foreign ancestry (i checked on ancestry.com, all my family are accounted for and english). We look afghan or something, shit's weird
But this is your dad right? What do you look like? Just a description is fine. Also, what about your mother?
I still think some kind of celt. It could be someone French too. There's been a lot of crossing over and especially if you've been round a long term megalopolis or whatever like London.
Do you tan easily? What's your skin tone like?
we look like afghan people, jaw bone quite defined, cheek bones relatively low set, round eyes, dark hair and skin. I tan really quickly, my dad's skin tone is like a bit darker than an arab, my skin tone is more a sort of cream colour. my mother is a keltic nordid (she's from up north). We live way out in the country side, pretty far from london
Cornish then. I know for sure that Cornish can be very dark skinned.
And no, I meant there is an ancestor back there somewhere. I don't know how far back you can trace with what you have but my point was more if your family have been in the south east for some time, then there could be an ancestor that came from somewhere else and it's just not recorded.
But yeah, I think it's one of the darker celtic types. It's not unusual; I've definitely seen it over in the west.
I enjoy discussing politics. /pol/ is the only place I know of where I can do so somewhat anonymously.
The Dutch genes are much stronger with my brother, father, nephew and uncles. I'm not particularly happy with my Nordic genes but it's almost considered exotic here.
Nordic is exotic in Netherlands? I thought you guys had plenty of it. I need to visit Netherlands someday. Have been living in Germany for 1 year and still haven't visited the neighbours whose bikes were stolen.
>I believe race/culture mixing is a bad thing,
I got those opinions to but i am afraid of expressing them publicly out of fear of being labelled a right wing extremist racist fascist Nazi.
I'd say somewhere in between Alpinid and Gorid. I'm an Amerimutt but am predominately Czech.
Maybe you will be taken more seriously if you apply correct grammar and start using capitals.
But you're right, in a different environment it's hard to express it without being labelled thus I tend to avoid it.
I don't think it is that rare at all.
>Muh Aryan genes are superior to shitskin Dravidian
>I don't think it is that rare at all.
Redpilled to /pol/ tier extent or somewhat close to it? No. Most women who are "redpilled" are redpilled in a different sense. Shit like "racial mixing isn't good", "politicians lie and steal" and "liberalism is shit". Some, very few, mostly older generations are somewhat redpilled about Jews too.
Well, probably not Australoid Dravidians. I believe they found Caucasoid, Australoid and Mongoloid skulls in the Indus Valley sites. It could well have been the Caucasoids responsible for all of their engineering, but who knows? They're all thoroughly blended together now in the stabilized "Indomelanid" race.
The Aryans were semi-nomadic like their relatives the Scythians. The Dravidians had an advanced civilization in the Indus Valley. All that mattered though was that the Aryans were the superior warriors which allowed them to become the new upper class of Indian society.
However it is clear that it was the Dravidians who civilized the Aryans, not the other way around. Think of the Mongol conquest of China: the Mongols were the superior warriors and became the new upper class but the Chinese were the ones with the advanced civilization. The Chinese did not become Mongolian, the Mongolians became Chinese.
How do we know that these "pure" races are not mixes from other races that no longer exist?
Because if they are then they're not really pure races.
Neo-Danubian looks the most like me, I think.
I'm a white American with a ton of mixed ancestry. I know that I'm a quarter Hungarian, but I can think of several other European countries that my ancestors came from.
Thank you based Netherlands for being so beautiful
>5 past Casillas
>cut/dive inside man
>cute red pilled girls
It seems like this year is yours
Where would Jews be classified in? I mean the literal "Khazar" Jews (Dark hair and brown eyes)
pic related, it's a jewess
I am still worried for Argentina/Belgium, Costa Rica though.
I honestly believe there are more people (including women) who believe history is written by the victorious than you think.
The pic is Not entirely accurate.
The Atlantid and Paleoatlantids trace their ancestry to Middle European and are usually found in Wales, France, Western Germany and Northern Spain. They usually trace their ancestry back to Brittonic Celts (the earliest inhabitants of Britain were described as having brown hair and brown eyes) or Early Iberian Celts in Spain, and really hit the scene when Roman soldiers mixed with Germanic Tribes, which explains it's prevalence in West Germany. France is a mix of Early Celts, Germanics, and Gallic/Celtic-Romans so it makes sense why this prototype is often found in France. It's often found in all of the British Isles.
Middle European, not "Mediterranean" AKA Southern European.
I'm assuming that isn't you, but the woman pictured is quite plain but she has a certain air about her that looks like she could be content with being locked away with someone in a penthouse for a few weeks and fucking for the entire time. cool
>Posting pictures of yourself on the internet
Sure is summerfag in here
This was a breath of fresh air.
So, I guess /pol/ isn't full of angry, mongoloid neckbeards and skin heads.
I think if /pol/ formed their own city, after the rape phase, it might actually end up pretty baller tier, with a good infrastructure and a bulking treasury.
Could /pol/ tell me the ethnicity of this girl? I honestly can't figure it out.
Yeah, she says she's mostly Irish, admitted a little Syrian, but I don't really think she's white. Considering making kids with her though and I want them to be sure of their heritage.
Give it your best guess and I'll tell you if you are right or not
wtf am i, im adopted so i dont have a clue who my parents were
Ah dont worry, you're all the same to me. Filthy goyim.
There is a clear consensus in literature that the Indus valley civ. was built by Dravidians (Proto-Caucasoid, an early offshoot of Caucasians), there are even signs of mass murder by Aryans (Caucasoid) as they moved into India. Austroloids who earlier migrated to India were replaced by a wave of Proto-Caucosoids known as Dravidians. However admixture between Dravidian and Austroloids surely took place in the Indian sub-continent.
Am I Hitler's wet dream yet or naw
Let's play a game /pol/. It might be easy to tell from close up shots, often HD, what someone's ethnicity is, but can you tell what this man's race is from stranger distance?
Holy shit the borreby couple look just like me and my sister. Except I'm not bald.
Where does borreby come from? Also am I at a higher risk for baldness?
my father, his brothers, and grandfathers. what do they look like?
Which one am I
> tfw race mixing has all but obliterated the distinct Caucasian bloodlines
Nord Atlantic. Irish. 100%. Probably some other mix but that's the most predominant. Eyes and eyebrows are a total giveaway. You could also though be Jewish or have some eastern european Jew. Similar eye situation but slightly more nuanced.
This will sound /x/-tier, but it's because we're in a warm earth mode.
Simple fact is the earth was much, much fucking colder, and therefore the lighter races were the dominants.
We're in decline because of the heating earth. Just got to ride it out another couple of hundred years, apparently the next Ice Age is going to be a good, hard one.
>tfw you now completely understand why Tolkien's work was full of the "West" declining, the "Elves" leaving, and the "Orcs", "Southerlings" and "Easterlings" were massing and taking over
He wasn't a nuts neo-nartzo, just ahead of the curve.
>This is considered a pseudo-science
There is literally no difference between the construction of species-subordinate taxonomic categories and the construction of species or superordinate taxonomic categories.
If racial groupings are "pseudo-scientific", then so is species and genus, etc.
Anthropology, and taxonomy in general, isn't very scientific, actually. It's about organizing living creatures into categories -- not especially scientific.
Actually, it's not your nose (which isn't prominent anyway) but your eyes. I can spot this now in almost anyone. It's very, very, very similar to what you get with the Irish but there's a slight almost imperceptible difference around the protuderance of the eyebrows.
Same vivid blue eyes and strong eyebrows but in Ashkenazi Jews, the eyebrow shelf is slightly more recessed so it gives an overall softer look and around the eyes as well. Very slight though. But yeah, I'm a genius eugenicist apparently. I just think this shit is so interesting and I'm a massive fan of these kinds of eyes anyway so I'm always looking out for them.
Anyway, yada, yada, cool opportunity to think about. Thanks.
Judging from this thread he's probs gorgeous as well.
You get different Scots, though. The reason I think so is because you've got broad Irish features round the eyes and nose but they're more refined. I've seen this a lot in Northern Ireland where there's a more obvious mix between the robust Irish types and then the more northern Scots.
Scandinavian otherwise definitely. Quite Irish eyes, certain broad celtic features, distinctly refined northern/Scandinavian otherwise. If you're American, I might venture a guess you're family come from some of the northern states like Minnesota or somewhere but that's only because of the Scandinavian thing so I could be wrong of course.
You can tell from the way they've posted, dummy. Lurk more.
The two who posted as "themselves". Not the middle eastern one pretending to be Irish that was put up by someone else.
Ok, cool. Still standing by my analysis though.