My English professor is making us read the following works:
"White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Backpack"
"How to Tame a Wild Tongue"
"Believing is Seeing Biology as Ideology"
We have to write an essay on how the race/gender (hispanic/female) of the author of "How to Tame a Wild Tongue" affect how people treated her or something.
Have the SJWs invaded Universities?
I don't know man
I'm a loser who dropped out partially because I saw the writing on the wall so I haven't been to an American University in about ~3 years-- but anecdotal experiences from all my friends who're still enrolled tell me that something like what OP posted isn't wholly impossible.
Maybe you should LISTEN AND BELIEVE instead of being such an asshole
No, this shit actually happens.
I had an anthropology class today that went over how race isn't an actual thing.
And they basically implied that 'WE HAVE TO THINK THIS WAY OTHERWISE SLAVERY WILL HAPPEN AGAIN'
Well, he's not physically forcing us to read/write an essay on the works, but I'm pretty sure anyone who doesn't will receive a 0.
This is a required English class. All majors have to take it because it's a GE. The name of the class is Composition or something.
Did you just make "lalala I can't heeeear you" the post? Why?
Some guy on Brit/pol/ posted this site that allows you to see where your UK Uni stands on free speech. The majority are basically fascist including Oxford.
why do people talk about white privilege when you are at a disadvantage for hiring if you are a white male?
hiring practices give women and minorities top priority on jobs.
...so why am I "privileged" when i'm at a relative disadvantage?
Universities should require conservative works;Mein Kampf,The Turner Diaries,How To Talk To A Liberal (If You Must),Atlas Shrugged,Agenda 21,The Reagan Diaries, Righteous Indignation: Excuse Me While I Save The World! from my personal hero Andrew Breitbart
>Believing is seeing
The actual, actual fuck is this? This sounds really familiar to that thing that went on recently. Cant remember if it was vidya or womyn related. The LISTEN & BELIEVE! Propaganda
Just write all your essays from the perspective that anti-white stuff is a roundabout way for anti-semites to harm Jewish people. When your teacher tries to reason with you, remind him of the 6 million and threaten to go to the dean.
Pretty much this, "white privilege" holds Saxon/Germanic populaces responsible for economic policies decided and dominated by Semites. It even goes as far as decrying "white bankers" and other groups that are Jews being held accountable as "whites"
Go on about how racist your teacher is.
>implying universities haven't been bastions of liberal bullshit for the last 30 years
read it and utterly destroy it in your paper/in class.
Most professors are not buthurtt by opposing opinions (I got an A on a Vietnam Paper indicating it was the one of the greatest wars the US have ever fought) even though my teacher was a draft dodger that smuggled marijuana from canada to mexico (imagine that shit trying to happen today)
Write as if you're a hard left marxist and play the game. It sucks, but there's no point getting a bad grade because your teacher's a cunt. When you get your degree, then you can actually say things that make sense, but until then you just need to check all of their boxes.
this is the bullshit that you DO NOT have to put up with. 99/100, the teacher asks YOUR opinion on shit, not what you think the professors opinion is.
OP, don't be a faggot like this british cuck. this is why they have sharia law there now.
Top Kek, I'll have to remember this argument
Why the fuck would anyone smuggle marijuana into Mexico?
OP, read the books if only to better understand the liberal cancer. You can attempt to debunk their arguments in your essay, or you can learn how to get an easy a by arguing for shit you don't believe in. Either way, take it as a learning experience
>Why the fuck would anyone smuggle marijuana into Mexico?
Probably because they want to smoke the good shit onna beach and not that crappy outdoor-grown-by-the-indians ditchweed?
>most professors are not butthurt by opposing opinions
True. I had a political economy professor that worshipped Krugman, hated Wall Street, and supported the tenets of The Occupy movement assign us an open ended research paper. Mine? The 2008 financial crisis was the fault of Clinton, Congress, and the Federal Reserve. Got a 91%.
>"Believing is Seeing Biology as Ideology"
Or what it should be titled,"how science used to oppress minority";
They should have a Native american studies, they're becoming extinct thanks to the slumlords shoving them all into ghettoes with the other minorities.
>Believing is Seeing Biology as Ideology
>Western ideology takes biology as the cause, and behavior and social statuses as the effects, and then proceeds to construct biological dichotomies to justify the “naturalness” of gendered behavior and gendered social statuses. What we believe is what we see—two sexes producing two genders. The process, however, goes the other way: gender constructs social bodies to be different and unequal. The content of the two sets of constructed social categories, “females and males” and “women and men,” is so varied that their use in research without further specification renders the results spurious.
I hate when sociologists try to understand real science.
This, if the game is rigged, play dirty, you dont have to prove shit to that fucker, you wont enlighten him anyway so just get your grades and make racist jokes in the lunch break.
I know your pain OP. I had to sit through a "history" class last semester that was taught by a self-professed member of the Communist Party and political activist. The shit he made us read still gives me nightmares.
Let me give you advice now don't try to do anything too stupid because I lost it mid way through the semester and wrote a scathing paper that almost got me kicked out of school and all the kids in my class thought it was the next Mein Kampf and of course the black chick said something about holocaust and slave trade.
Look long story short just tough it out bro.
Oh it was awful. It was a general history course of the modern era with a focus on politics. So we were going over the major political movements and would write essays on them and shit.
Well the lectures were horrible. He spent most of the class talking about how whites destroyed the planet, Europeans are space aliens who care about nothing but genocide, and how blacks in Africa would have been civilized if the barbaric Europeans didn't invade them.
My class was composed of this really quiet kid who I could tell was just trying to get by, three ditzy girls, some normal folks, a black fucking pan-african bitch, some dungeree wearing feminist, a lesbian, and some feminist guy.
We had to write an essay on why "communist uprisings were so popular from the years 1900-1939 and how communism would have triumphed if not blahblahblah" you get where this is going... well let's just say my essay involved /pol/'s favorite friends.
well correct me if i am mistaking but in post-colonial times communism is very appealing for every poor fuck who gets wasted in some mine, plantation or factory.
I mean if someone comes and promises you your shit gets better sure you gonna support him.
Not saying its a good concept but the poor ex-soviet countries still say they wish the Soviets back. No need for a jewish plot to make communism popular.
Even the moderate european socialists get mainly voted by working class people cause the rest of the parties adress their politics to the "rich" folks.
When you go months of hearing about Communism, how Europeans are evil, how white people are evil, how womyn are oppressed and blacks commit crimes because white people "force" them then you would say fuck it all and let loose like I did.
It would have been almost bearable but the loudmouth panafrician and feminist and lesbian literally never shut the fuck up.
I'm becoming a counselor and I had to read this for a class.
Also, one of our textbooks was the book in my pic. I've been meaning to make an epic thread about that class.
Here is the author of the book. His face appears to be made out of vagina flaps.
Take this opportunity to create a counterargument backed by actual statistics.
>SJW s - "Blacks are under represented in the tech industry!"
>Silicon Valley is racist!!
You - "Well, actually representation for blacks in this industry is exactly proportional to their education in CompSci and InfoSys.... That is why Asians are over represented."
Then you can rip her a new asshole and tell her that SJWs and PC bullshit is ruining higher education. Just dont reveal your true power level.
>forced to take english class
>instead the teacher makes you read race books
Haha I have the same book. I wish I could just read some damn literature instead of participate in their bullshit kulturekampf. Frankfurt School Marxism seeks to turn groups against each other to gain power
(For the book see the libgen website)
The myth’s omissions are grotesque. It ignores three major pillars of our nationhood: genocide, enslavement, and imperialist expansion (such nasty words, who wants to hear them? — but that’s the problem). The massive extermination of indigenous peoples provided our land base; the enslavement of African labokr made our economic growth possible; and the seizure of half of Mexico by war (or threat of renewed war) extended this nation’s boundaries north to the Pacific and south to the Rio Grande. Such are the foundation stones of the United States, within an economic system that made this country the first in world history to be born capitalist... Racism as Linchpin of the U.S. National Identity"
This is a prevention of hierarchy.
The Traditional Marxists said all the workers were better and the Capitalist were oppressors. No, due to the industrial revolution they happened to gain a lot of money. The gap between worker and Capitalist has decreased largely since that time. The Capitalists ran industry, they read books, they created civilization. Did Marx read boating books about mathematics and engineering?
The Neo-Marxists claim the white race stole, cheated, murdered, etc. No, for example, in the US they created civilization, when Europeans went to Africa they also sought to bring them into "the fraternity of civilization". Yes there were monster (eg Leopold II) yet the main goal was to bring the Africans into politics. For example, African-American chattle slavery, this was the kindest slavery to have existed, whites were the ones who first began to think slavery was wrong, whites were the ones to end global slavery.
Leftist are fundamentally all about destruction. To destroy the pillars of society. Destroy the religion, destroy the extend family (ethnicity), destroy the nuclear family, destroy the individual, then we will all be interchangeable cogs in their utopian machine. Those on the left are all either useful idiots or actively working towards this goal.
>The myth’s omissions are grotesque. It ignores three major pillars of our nationhood: genocide, enslavement, and imperialist expansion (such nasty words, who wants to hear them? — but that’s the problem). The massive extermination of indigenous peoples provided our land base; the enslavement of African labokr made our economic growth possible; and the seizure of half of Mexico by war (or threat of renewed war) extended this nation’s boundaries north to the Pacific and south to the Rio Grande. Such are the foundation stones of the United States, within an economic system that made this country the first in world history to be born capitalist... Racism as Linchpin of the U.S. National Identity"
But that's exactly right. Do they mention all of the forced government interventions and propped up anti-communist dictators?
Write that Shakespeare was a racist putting Othelo as a irrational, dumb protagonist, and Dante was not cool putting muslims in hell, and the best thing to do is to burn all Shakespeare and Dante works to the ground.
PS: say that Cervantes deserved that bad arm after fighti9ng in Lepanto and that Ottoman Empire should have won that battle.
Yeah OK, warriors fighting warriors was totally genocide. This is a very patronizing, condescending, and poisonous view. Groups of people have always fought and killed other groups of people, everyone is an immigrant to somewhere. The difference is the focus and prevailance of anti-White memes in the West.
And yes, luckily not all of Native American culture was lost.
I guess he just doesnt like that its not depicted as a great achievment of noble piece but basically what we would call nig-nog behaviour if it was a single person within a society.
>I hate when sociologists try to understand real science
Daily reminder that the entire humanities department isn't actually science.
Psychologist Timothy D. Wilson, a professor at the University of Virginia, expressed resentment in his Times Op-Ed article on Thursday over the fact that most scientists don't consider his field a real science. He casts scientists as condescending bullies:
"Once, during a meeting at my university, a biologist mentioned that he was the only faculty member present from a science department. When I corrected him, noting that I was from the Department of Psychology, he waved his hand dismissively, as if I were a Little Leaguer telling a member of the New York Yankees that I too played baseball.
"There has long been snobbery in the sciences, with the 'hard' ones (physics, chemistry, biology) considering themselves to be more legitimate than the 'soft' ones (psychology, sociology)."
The dismissive attitude scientists have toward psychologists isn't rooted in snobbery; it's rooted in intellectual frustration. It's rooted in the failure of psychologists to acknowledge that they don't have the same claim on secular truth that the hard sciences do. It's rooted in the tired exasperation that scientists feel when non-scientists try to pretend they are scientists.
Oh the book was: From Inquiry to Academic Writing: A Text and Reader by Stuart Greene and April Lidinsky
I remember how the female feminist author was whining on some YouTube video about how swimsuits were a tool of the patriarchy or some shit.
I looked up Stuart Greene and as I remember he graduated in "PanAfrican culture" and "Critical Race Theory" which means he is totally delusional and thing evil whitey is what causes minority underperformance. Except race doesn't exist. How can people be so delusional?
>tfw I can use 'muh perecution for centuries under British rule, muh famine, muh Civil Rights.' to get out of shit like this.
>have the SJW's invaded universities
>White privilege is represented as a literal burden
>Just write all your essays from the perspective that anti-white stuff is a roundabout way for anti-semites to harm Jewish people. When your teacher tries to reason with you, remind him of the 6 million and threaten to go to the dean.
This. Now is the time to unload all of those "Jewish Privilege" stats you've been collecting on /pol/ OP. Now is the time to display your power level. Slay the SJW with their own rhetoric.
>But that's exactly right.
Eh the only thing thats correct is a bit of imperialism.
The Native Americans were few in number, spread out, regularly killed each other (in fact many of the first slaves in America were Natives that had been captured by their rivals and were sold to the White man, but many of them died in captivity in the first year or two from disease which ended up being a driving force behind the start of the North Atlantic Slave Trade).
African slaves didn't really do that much shit because we never had that many of them. They made a handful of people (1%) rich, thats it. Most of the slaves got shipped to South America and the islands where they died by the thousands to the harsh jungle environments and diseases. So even 300 years ago slaves in America had it pretty good by comparison.
Mexico sold that land to the USA, and then tried to take it back by force after they had our money. We did indeed push their shit in for crossing us.
At last I truly understand just how great this country was.