>>42363631 beneficial. eventually some asian or high slav will figure out how to install artificial lady eggs in there. feminists have already tried banning sexbots (despite the fact they don't exist yet) for a reason
IS IT REALLY SO HARD FOR YOU BETAS TO GO OUTSIDE AND TALK TO A GIRL AND GET IN HER PANTS THAT YOU HAVE TO BUY ONE OF THESE RETARDED INVENTIONS? ARTIFICIAL SEX IS INFERIOR AND DEGENERATE COMPARED TO THE REAL DEAL
>>42363631 why bother. there are plenty of fat chicks who will sleep with just about anyone for free on okc and tinder. you have to be a complete loser to want to bone one of these things over a low self esteem whore.
> Feminists are put into computer science labs as required by quotas > They are put into machine learning, robot vision and artificial intelligence labs > A brave womyn figures out how to turn feminism into a series of algorithms > Install feminism.exe on sexbots > Robofeminists > Human privilege > Cyberape
>>42363631 It will utterly and completely destroy any power woman have over men. We will be free to fuck out robowaifus any time any way any place and get back to what is important. Women will either become second class citizens or adhere to strict submissive wifely roles for prestigious men to select.
>>42363631 Well. Having sex ith a robot is degenerate....there is no love or passion but just lust. But on a bright note this may stop female manipulation and domination of males through sex; women control men through sex, because women have better self control with a 2.5 less of a sex drive than men.
It would revolutionize hetero relationships. Women would now have to compete with someone who won't say no, who is made to order and never ages, who will be programmed to share your interests and perspectives. Competition is why women don't get along with each other. Introduce it in daily life and all straight men will enjoy life.
>>42363828 even you would benefit from the existence of robot wives. Your wife would know that she could be replaced, and that shifts the power back in your hands. in that you would not have to use your hand
>Come from from exhausting day of flashing homeless people >Take off my Duster and throw it over the couch/toilet >Rummage through yesteryear's beef noodle soup trying to find a solid piece >Jackpot, dinner is ready >Hold the yeasty spice mush in my hand dripping over my proud erect 3 incher >"H-hey robotu-sama I-I made dinner for us!!" :3 >With a metallic cog-like noise she turns her head away >"Ohrr, I see you made beef stroke-n-off white-u pig-u" >tears
Women will be treated more like men - no longer be able to get away with childish behaviour - because there will no longer be men willing to put up with it. With easy access to sex, there's no longer a long line of men willing to fuck any girl for any reason. Some women will genuinely experience what many men experience - utter loneliness as not a soul cares even one whit for you, not even as a fucktoy.
With decent sex becoming so cheap, women will have to find some other ways of becoming valuable and attractive than just their body.
Also, I don't think this revolution will start with sexbots. I think it'll start within the next few years with virtual reality.
>>42363631 It would be awesome, but very detrimental. White people and a few others, you know, people who actually work, will be the only ones able to afford them and smart enough to use the,. Those using them won't breed and the poor, lazy, and stupid will breed.
It will encourage men to withdraw into hedonistic, masturbatory bubbles disconnected from the real world, depriving us the motivation to achieve anything of real value. Further, it will vulgarize male-female relationships to being little more than animalistic copulations devoid of anything resembling real affection. Thirdly, it will plummet our already dwindling, below replacement level fertility rates until primitive and savage, yet vital populations take over by the virtue of numbers alone.
Believe me, humans aren't meant to have their every fantasy fulfilled. It will not bring happiness, but make us unmotivated, degenerate and ghastly hollow.
>>42363631 You have to see it as part of something bigger. It would be boring if there were only sex bots. Therefor I don't think it will be bad. Though I imagine for awhile it'll be like going to the store for condoms... that awkwardness...
>>42363631 things will probably be about the same as now. unless a robot can: >lubricate itself >talk dirty and communicate >fuck you back >produce the right smells >produce significant 'body' heat ...as well as a human then it's not nearly as good.
>>42366102 or the dexterity to 'fuck you back.' i'm sure it could heat up and ive seen lubes sold online that are reported to smell of a woman. never bought any though. the 'human' experience is going to be very difficult to replicate in any meaningful or cost effective way.
>>42364925 pretty much this. The energy consumed in making oneself attractive to women: how you look, how you speak, how you chamr etc, takes too much time and effort for just a pussy, and not even a 10/10, more like a 7-8.10 in best case.
Not to mention... when it comes time to move or to throw it away, and the neighbors see you hauling off what looks like a body in large plastic bags, it's going to make for great local TV news coverage.
I used to work three jobs and I'd often have 14 hour days - having some kind of cooking and housekeeping assistance that would also give you sex would be pretty awesome for hardworking men. Women don't seem to want to take on that role anymore and thus, we turn to robots.
Women would presumably get their own hunky robot handymen with vibrating cocks and we wouldn't have to put up with each other's bullshit anymore if we didn't want to.
>>42365263 >Buy Robotic waifu >Spend a few happy years with her >She'll let me do anything >People keep telling me to try a real woman! It's much better! Real emotions and a real connection they say.
Find a real woman and take her home. >Cops come ringing the door early morning, saying they had reports of disturbing reports of screaming >find woman packaged under my bed >elbows, knees, jaws and spine all get's dislocated >apparently real women were not meant to be bent the way I was used to them doing
>>42363631 no man will have to put up with a womans bullshit ever again. any one who fucks just for fun will not need a woman anymore. the robots will probably also be able to give birth. since men can cut off their dicks or have it inverted and be implanted with dna or an egg or a fetus the same could probably be done for a robot.
>>42365263 >to achieve anything of real value Fucking a chick isn't something of great value. Lest the result be procreation, and even that can be done by other means nowadays. If we could get rid of the time consuming, silly game pursuing a sexual relationship is, we'd clear our priorities for greater things, not decline into fapcaves.
>>42363723 and be locked into an unhappy marriage with a vapid unappreciative cunt that deserves my money for siring my shitty could I wasn't there to raise because I was working to pay for her expensive tastes developed on my dime?
If I could do it all again, I'd just enjoy my money alone.
Once neural interfaces become a commodity item, there's going to be a set of social upheavals like you can't begin to imagine.
The ability to have any sex you want is just the beginning--imagine being able to have any kind of body you want; tumblr otherkins will end up surviving on IV fluids while they live out their entire lives as dragon/mlp/dickgirl cuck princesses in a virtual world that they'll prefer over reality.
Prostitution will become much more competitive--after all, when it's functionally free to fuck any celeb you want, vs. spending cash to bang some dirty street slut, few men are going to want the latter.
The whole pheromones thing--once you can stimulate the parts of the brain that respond to pheromones directly, do you think the whole "it's not a real woman" thing will matter?
The funny thing is that feminists are the ones driving this entire thing, by making men more and more desperate for some approximation of female companionship.
Ultimately, this is all for the good--feminists and their ilk are going to lose the advantage they have over lonely, emotionally weak men, when those men don't need to endure endless female abuse to get laid; since they've already shown a preference for fantasy over reality--by pretending that those women could ever possibly care for them--they'll have no issues with the fact that nothing they experience is real.
The Matrix was a vastly optimistic movie--AI isn't needed for the vast majority of humans to enslave themselves; they'll do it all on their own.
If birthrates keep collapsing the production of new human beings will be done by the state in the future, Brave New World-style. They're actually the people who caused the birthrate collapse in the first place by basically stealing all the return parents got from having children, redistributing some of it as entitlements and keeping the rest.
>tfw part of one of the last generations of freeborn people before everyone is raised in a state orphanage
Any scientist would see Sex Robots as a extremely effective tool for potentially making some STDs go extinct.
Think about it, some STDs exist today because humans still need to have sex.
If people stopped spreading STDs and just fucked their robot, that STD never gets a chance to spread and when the person dies and the robot gets decontaminated and scrapped, that STD will also die with that person.
By fucking robots, you increase the chances of STDs going extinct.
That's why I hated the movie Her. By the time technology reaches that level of artificial intelligence, society would have been more than capable of creating human-like androids. Give the damn computer an ass and tits
>>42368505 The movie Her leaves a lot of things open ended so it's hard to say how truly advanced that thing was. Keep in mind that different areas of science progress at different rates. Maybe the humans at the time knew better than to give an AI it's own body because it would have too much access to the real world.
>>42363631 I always thought it would make men less sex-obsessed in their interactions with females, but it will apparently also make many of them cease to interact with females, but this might be a good thing because it will act as a sort of social filter for filtering out the type of men women don't want to bother with, and therefore make the relationships men do have with women more meaninful. Seems like it would be good.
Oh yeah, there's just one problem. Negroes and dumb liberal sluts.
>>42369145 i'm totally waiting i'm still pretty young hardly mid twenties i'm pretty interested in VR guess i'll turn into one of the dating sim fags if i don't get my shit together before that all becomes a thing.
real woman >costs thousands and more of dollars a year in upkeep >emotions to get in the way of everything >expects to be first in everything >calls the police and claims rape whenever she loses an argument
robot >one time cost of several thousand >does one thing and one thing only. and does it well. >doesnt talk back, fight, argue, demand expensive things, etc.
>my linux motd and issue file was once jokes about a cake in a video game.. >specifically, the bundt cake from Mario RPG, the part where Booster stands on it and asks where his cake is, and his servants tell him he's standing on it >about a year later, 'the cake is a lie' became le epik meme xD >and it clashed unfortunately with that inside joke of mine >and so eventually I started joking 'the cake is poisoned'
>>42369647 This. Also, I'm probably not in any position to comment in regards to how most human females would react or why. They are like an alien species to me, particularly because of their mental qualities, I can only have unfalsifiable theories in regards to how their minds work. They are certainly strange creatures.
>>42369427 Relationships and people aren't meant to be perfect, but isn't that supposed to be part of the beauty? Anyways, if the people demand it, it will come and >>42364676 we'll just have to say goodbye to the white race.
Women will no longer be retarded slaves who always follow their basic instincts, but reasonable people, since they're forced to think and build a personality since they have literarily no other value left.
>>42368151 that's actually a smart point, remember though; std's can be passed on from mother to child. You'd need to have really bad luck though for your mom to be having a breakout while you're being born though
>>42368911 It could have really been great if it looked into the character as helplessly in love. Instead, it decided "Let's make it completely acceptable for a guy to be in love with an AI" followed by "Hi, I'm the AI, and I'm leaving you for another AI LOL" as an ending
They ditched a premise of heartbreak in the fact that he loved a being that was both artificial and incapable of returning his affection physically for "Wahhh my pc left me for another pc"
I'm not saying the movie should have made him completely pathetic. It should have presented this clearly pathetic situation but at the same time present it in such a moving way that the audience could not help but empathize with the main character
>>42369893 >just in time to keep the boomers alive Ah so I guess us 20somethings are fucked anyways then, probably going to be expensive as fuck, as these companies will be able to control the supply and obviously demand will be high as fuck
>>42363631 >In compliance with the global feminist initiative act of 2025 all sex robots are counted as tools of the patriarchy and a threat to biological women >possession is punishable by 30 years hard labour
>>42370203 Honestly, i'd want one for the days when i dont feel like leaving the house for a bootycall, or those middle of the night wake up with a rager moments.
basically, i just want to masturbate. and after owning various fleshlights and their generic knockoffs, i have concluded that masturbatory sleeves are vastly superior to the standard rosy palms. but real sex is still superior >but only slightly...
>>42370213 The only big problem I see is that today's moralfag, feminist dominated society will desperately try everything they can to shut down funding of actual robots that can be used for sexual intercourse. They might delay the development of affordable, mass produced sex-bots for a good 50-100 years everywhere outside of Japan.
Please don't think that just because we visit the same Taiwanese freight schedule bulletin board that me, you or anyone else here must be similar. We look and act very different, /pol/ is just a shared interest. Don't make the mistake of thinking everyone here is a fat aspie.
Guys like you really do want a 10/10 perfect housewife as rare as that is, while at the same time bringing nothing amazing to the table yourself. Even normal girls don't desire you, never mind girls who are tripping over marriage requests. There's a lot of Elliot Rodger Lites here.
The jews won. They dismantled the white western world throughout the 20th Century. Who wants to live in a society and culture totally dominated by a tribe of greedy, loathsome, hate-filled two-legged rats? Better to die and never have to witness their triumph over the circumcised (life-long curse of jew overlords) slave hordes?
>>42363631 Beneficial for a while IF they're affordable for poor people. Poor uneducated people would hopefully get sex boys since they don't want to have to pay for kids. We'll hopefully end up with fewer uneducated voters being born.
>>42370478 Here's some more good news: I think most normal people aren't going to actually care very much about the robowaifus either, because they're going to be too busy with what is known as 'bread and circuses', and of course, actually getting fucked. The only people who are going to be upset about this will be a bunch of retards. Nobody rational has any reason to be upset.
Its more like 12-17x more testosterone from what I have read, but can't say exactly where I got that fact from. Google it.
Testosterone is the main factor in sex drive. So I would imagine the average man has much much higher than 2.5x the sex drive of an average woman.
When you hear women say "we want sex just as much as men do", it is simply complete nonsense.
Not that I support trannies, but read about the experiences the female to male transsexuals. Its like a complete mind fuck for them when they start taking testosterone. They finally get it, that men simply can't help being so preoccupied with sex. That's how nature made us.
>>42370545 Crack is sold illegally on the street. For technology to advance, there needs to be funding and there can only be funding if there is a chance to make money. You won't be able to buy a functional, affordable sex-bot off the black market. For prices to become affordable, there needs to be a legal mass production and a way to distribute the product easily and legally.
>>42365263 I agree, but it'll only be a niche product cause most men will want an actual person while others who have problems with concepts like love can more or less "take their stress out" however I don't think that will affect them well in normal society since most will be /r9k/-tier and may decide to fucking rape any pretty girl they see and kill them if they aren't submissive via primal instinct.
joints can be tightened with wrenches, a burnt out computer parts can be swapped out. And i seriously doubt they would start putting hydraulics in them.
and i would expect it to be fully modular. every joint is a disconnect point allowing total customization, and ease of repair.
>leg broke? buy a new one >broke her jaw because you flailed about in bed? we got you covered *jaw comes with special 9 pointed allen wrench. no other tools needed!* >shred her vagina because you are lonely as fuck and abuse the doll upwards of 15 times a day? we got inserts of every variety, size, and style you could ever imagine, and even those you cant! replacement is as easy a inserting a paperclip into the quick release slot. Kinda like your daddy did back in the day when the CD door stuck shut.
Why would feminists oppose sexbots? Men, who are all just eternally horndogs after all, will have a good outlet for their carnal desires. This means they will approach women, those pure creatures, without ulterior motives.
>you won't be able to buy a functional, affordable sex-bot off the black market
We're going to be flooded with 3D printers, super-powerful computers and robotics parts by the end of the decade, it'll be impossible to keep people from building whatever they like unless we turn into a totalitarian society
>>42371139 reminder that you will burn in hell because you have made up your mind not to try and save those poor, lost hedonist souls. You are no christian and god will punish you moreso than any hedonist who simply didn't believe in him out of ignorance. You believe in him and despite that, decide to be egoistic and flat out evil.
>>42371195 >We're going to be flooded with 3D printers, super-powerful computers and robotics parts by the end of the decade, it'll be impossible to keep people from building whatever they like unless we turn into a totalitarian society
>dont mean to hijack thread
the economy in the future will be proper fucked. fuck buying a $40,000 car. someone just uploaded a file to the internet that can print the exact fucking car. all i need is to just supply the $1,000 in printer material.
i also see classic government response >everything ever created, being created, and to be created must have a serial number and registered with local officials. Objects found without an approved 1,024 bit key will be destroyed and the owner imprisoned for no fewer than 10 years, no more than 35, and forced to pay a fine 125% of the value of the item they copied.
>hookerbots haven't become commonplace >microchips are barely being implemented into the human body >full body cyberization most likely won't be realized in my lifetime >self lacing sneakers, dehydrated pizza, and hoverboards don't exist
>>42363631 If sexbots are widely used then there must be something seriously wrong with society for men and women to hate each other that much. I doubt that they will be affordable to your average person for a very long time. And even then it will not make anyone with a sexbot any less lonely.
>spend $500 for a top of the line sexbot with ribbed, vibrating, 3 size (loli, highschool, and used mom) vagina with replaceable face so i can pretend it's my waifu >the only extra cost is cleaning and maybe skin replacement depending on how terminatoresque you want it >can have consensual sex for the sole purpose of procreation with my waifu whenever i want, she'll always be in the mood >thousands of dollars cheaper than maintaining a real girlfriend and with 100% less drama and cucking and who is always tired or not in the mood normals getting #btfo by technology once again
Artificial muscle. Servos can replicate the range of motion accurately, but they're either not fast enough or they're noisy. Something anatomically similar to a human is preferential, no one wants to feel servos under a rubber shell Sensors for facial recognition, depth perception of objects in the environment, natural language processes Compute power, an immense amount of it. It takes roughly 13~ years for the compute power of a super computer to fit inside of an enthusiast PC, and that amount of power would then have to fit inside of the robot Artificial skin, or a close substitute because injection molded silicone isn't good enough Face has to bridge the uncanny valley, or be designed intentionally to look robotic Near self learning, true self learning isn't a must, the system must simply be easy enough to program that the owner can train it to accomplish certain tasks that it is not already familiar with Similarly a sentient AI wouldn't be necessary either. The system just has to be good enough at certain things to be convincing like IBM's Watson. It derives context from written text or the spoken word, and can generate accurate responses when asked a question aloud. Power is one of the big issues. Lithium ion batteries aren't good enough, and even tripling their capacity with a silicon anode wouldn't be good enough. They'd need a power source with at least a magnitude higher energy density. Sugar is a viable option. Its non volatile, energy density is very high, and the byproducts of the chemical reaction are water and CO2, much like brewing wine. Sugar enzyme batteries would be viable if the right enzyme cascade were created. You would power your waifu with teacups of sugar water.
There dozens of other technical stepping stones that have to be reached before anyone mass produces something akin to a robowaifu. Its safely a decade or more away from being viable.
>>42370685 You can't go to the moon You can't explore outer space You can't buy have a telephone that you can also play games with You can't go over 80 miles per hour You can't mix chocolate pudding into your cereal
And if you really believe so, I feel sorry for you.
>>42372581 >Compute power, an immense amount of it. It takes roughly 13~ years for the compute power of a super computer to fit inside of an enthusiast PC >and that amount of power would then have to fit inside of the robot no, you can just remote it. only some fast motor responses need to be done by the robot body itself, higher level navigation and all that can be computed remotely.
>Sugar is a viable option. Its non volatile, energy density is very high, and the byproducts of the chemical reaction are water and CO2, much like brewing wine the energy density of complex organic molecules may be decent on paper, but a robot body is constrained by volume and weight. the machinery to process it would be both too heavy and too bulky. not to mention that it would be a wet chemical process and enzyme-catalyzed processes are not perfect, they have side-products, i.e. waste you would have to deal with.
lithium batteries wouldn't be that bad, indoors they could be tethered most of the time anyway. not the most convenient thing but not a big hurdle either.
>>42371048 >It just shows how controlled most men are That's because we're built as men. This is the body we grew up with and was born with. These people simply fucked with a single or a few aspects of their original body and expect they'll be right as rain. Silly. Very silly.
>>42372581 Its impossible to say what impact it would have on our culture and society as a whole, because we have no idea what our culture will look like 10+ years from now. Even so, we're talking about a device that is at the peak of technological sophistication, they're not going to be a commodity item. Its something that would likely sell upwards of a million dollars, and be made to order. Your average person won't have one for the foreseeable future.
Personally I don't think anyone should look forward to something that would further contribute to the lowering of white birth rates, even if it accounts for a statistically tiny percentage. Mexicans are going to continue to have big families for religious and cultural reasons. Blacks are going to continue to have many children because of welfare, and because no one in the ghetto has been informed of the advent of condoms. No one wants a future where society is over run by the lowest classes.
>>42372776 Cloud computing isn't a viable option, and you've got to be out of your fucking mind for even wanting it as an option. You would have something that is quite literally a botnet robot, all of its sensor data and logs would be datamined by the company who owned the servers.
Sugar batteries exist, there is no complex machinery involved. The amount of lithium required to power something with such high draw even for an hour would be extremely prohibitive. Lithium is volatile, it doesn't matter what anode it used, or what safety features a battery implements. A shorted out or over discharged battery can still explode. A smartphone with a 2000mah~ battery can burn clean through a couch or mattress, its more than enough to burn down an entire house when one goes. A battery with ten times the capacity or greater would ignite like a bomb detonating. Its not a viable solution.
You have no idea what you're talking about, Kraut.
>>42372776 >lithium batteries wouldn't be that bad, indoors they could be tethered most of the time anyway. not the most convenient thing but not a big hurdle either. this is what i was thinking.
we are talking about sexbots not relationship bots. sexbot would really only need to be "wireless" for a few hours allowing ample time for the sex to happen. relationshipbot? one you tow around all over where access to electricity might be impossible? yea, i have no idea.
>>42373143 >Cloud computing isn't a viable option You know there's a middle ground between being google's slave and having everything embedded, right?
>Sugar batteries exist that doesn't say anything about their efficiency
>something with such high draw like I said, externalize the computing, then you only need to support the mechanical parts, which isn't all that much for a robot that only does some light walking around.
>>42373868 >like I said, externalize the computing, then you only need to support the mechanical parts, which isn't all that much for a robot that only does some light walking around.
Forgetting about the vibrating pussy, the ability to regulate vag/mouth heat from cold to warm in a seconds notice, the vagspin function, different levels of suction in both mouth and vag, the automated regulation of wetness
>>42373868 No, there is no middle ground. Either processing is discrete, or your data is harvested by someone else. Thats all there is to it. Datamining and marketing are the biggest sources of revenue for companies like Google because of how profitable that data is. No one would pass up the opportunities to get their hands on the data collected by a walking sensor array that lived in your house.
I needn't say anything about their efficiency, they speak for themselves. As I stated, you have no idea what you're talking about. You didn't even know that they existed so you blathered about needed large machinery to extract power from a sugar source. In all this time you could have done a simple search and educated yourself, but you didn't. But I'm feeling generous so I'll give you a push in the right direction http://www.businessinsider.com/sugar-based-battery-developed-by-virginia-tech-2014-1 A lab project netted a working battery with twice the energy of a lithium ion cell per weight.
It doesn't take any heavy machinery to utilize a sugar to produce electricity. The devices are absurdly simple, so much so that you can simply open them and pour in more sugar as needed. They're the simplest fuel cells around. Any significant research into refinement of the enzymes being used would net an even higher energy density device. This is a hilariously easier task than trying to solve the chemistry issues behind improving lithium cells with different anodes, that will sill be volatile and toxic no matter what.
You're also grossly underestimating how much power it could take to move a bipedal machine, even if it was an unrealistic 50lbs~
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at email@example.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.