ITT: Blacks who don't understand sarcasm
If you'd like to fight a twitter mob, now is your chance
How long until the subhumans start issuing death threats over the N-word?
/pol/ likes to go on and on about their freeze peaches, but conveniently forget that every student signs an agreement to abide by a univeristy's code of conduct when they enroll.
That means universities have the ability to limit speech that is meant to create a hostile enviornment on campus for such groups as racial and ethnic minorities. So, ofterntimes, universities have bureaucratic departments dealing with issues relating to diversity or hateful, harrassing speech. And this is all pretty standard and good, because without these offices and efforts to include minority students in the campus culture (in which they are often an even smaller minority) create a place where everybody feels safe - not from new ideas - but from the kind of bigotry that incites hostile and exclusionary attitudes.
In reality, it really is not that different from a private business like a restaurant from banning or censuring you for standing in the middle of the floor and shouting racial obscenities. It's their place of operation, and they have the right to restrict that type of speech.
>black people literally believe white college students keep gas chambers and furnaces in their dorms
>And this is all pretty standard and good, because without these offices and efforts to include minority students in the campus culture (in which they are often an even smaller minority) create a place where everybody feels safe - not from new ideas - but from the kind of bigotry that incites hostile and exclusionary attitudes.
I find it hilarious you believe this actually exists anywhere, but the internet and the KKK. People who attend college these days do not hold any belief that would pose a threat to anyone.
He's gonna shoot her then the SJWs will call racism when he gets arrested.
Then let the University punish her, instead of supporting an angry twitter mob who want to destroy her life purely because she dared to utter a joke at the expense of our nigger overlords.
Another white person about to get BTFO
Media is gunna have a field day
Probs gunna be riots
>I find it hilarious you believe this actually exists anywhere, but the internet and the KKK.
I think that's the kind of attitude which allows racial hate to flow on campus and creates awful situations like the racist frat chant from earlier this year. You don't have to be a Klansman to present ideas and words that can hurt and exclude people from a campus environment where they should be totally welcome.
And really, how can you blame the school here? They want all their students (who are also customers in a sense) to feel comfortable and included on campus. If somebody is making racially hateful language, they have plenty of incentive to act on it, and really, its a moral obligation too.
>People who attend college these days do not hold any belief that would pose a threat to anyone.
It's a nice thought, that education eradicates hates, but it is simply not true. The attitudes and beliefs that young people grow up with do not suddenly fly the coop when they go off to college, and ofterntimes manifest themselves as slurs and personal racist attacks as adults.
>respect to the resistant who saved jews
> fuck the traitors who cooperated with the nazi occupation governement
> oh somebody is making an offensive joke ?
> better sell her to the institution and be proud of it
These subhumans would have sold jew by the pack of 12 during WW2 kek
>Then let the University punish her, instead of supporting an angry twitter mob who want to destroy her life purely because she dared to utter a joke
First of all, if she has a right to say awful things, the people on twitter do too.
Secondly, its not "just a joke." That's a horrible way of excusing racial bigotry. Jokes are funny, calling people terrible slurs that have been used in slavery and Jim Crow oppression is not.
Sorry, but you absolutely do not have total free speech on a college campus. It is an insular community that needs to have some form of internal policy for dealing with intimidation.
God fuck this sexism, why do boys always have to ask mom to do everything, why can't they ask dad to do something once in a while? Is it because they think that taking care of the house isn't "real work" so surely moms have plenty of time to do their bidding?
yes, publicly shaming this white girl and tearing down any associations she's affiliated with will surely lift the black community out of crime and poverty.
>The attitudes and beliefs that young people grow up with do not suddenly fly the coop when they go off to college
I agree, I am stating that they never held racist or bigoted ideas in the first place. If they do they are usually smart not espouse them in public(unlike this young lady). Usually people hide their power level especially if they are white. Don't you understand that most colleges are left leaning and it would be suicide to openly hold racist ideas, like in this case where this girl is about to be crucified by social media?
According to _marystcloud's Twitter feed, our "perpetrator's" name is Gracen Tilton. Pic related
Get fucked, libshits. I CAN say whatever the hell I want and you are GOING to take it, and if any of you could speak proper English, you would increase the quality of your argument rather than getting a buttblasted lunch mob together every time someone says nigger.
Honestly I hate what they do on twitter like you all but these people are idiots for publicly posting this. Let's all just keep our racism hidden inside until it explodes one day.
I am so crazy and unhinged in my life right now I wish this was done to me. I'd self destruct gloriously but not before I drop redpolls and refuse to apologize. I'd just move to Europe anyway where I have dual citizenship.
She jokingly claimed that niggers are the reason the Campus wifi is bad, It's clearly a bad joke and not offensive at all unless you have the mental capacity of a lemon.
In response, twittards are calling for her to be a social outcast or worst and somehow you think this is justified.
Eh, the worst that'll happen is a reprobation and maybe suspension. She'll also be a social pariah on campus.
Universities don't go out of their way to expel someone. Court cases are costly for them, even if they would win. We had a bunch of students at the UIUC last year who made a bunch of racist and sexist tweets about the Asian vice president. They just got called in to have a chat with the lady.
>and creates awful situations like the racist frat chant from earlier this year.
wow, a racist chant? What an awful situation. It's almost as bad a sentencing an innocent person to death because they're black or lynching an entire family. Hell, that's almost as bad as 100 years of slavery!
> assuming it's hate speech
> assuming it's harrasing speech
> assuming she means what she wrote
> assuming minority doesn't get integrated because of that
> assuming these institution doesn't like to go all on out about every minor incident
It's like you are an office of research on UFO
Of course you will spit bullshit in order to make it seems your works is valuable
The same shit happened with women studies and feminist
They needed and ennemy to make it seems they were still relevant
> assuming they were ever relevant
> assuming you are something else than a complete degenerate or a troll
So where's the sarcasm? I don't get it. Also this bitch is dumb enough to write that shit when the saying a single word can make national news and the professional victims unit will be after her instantly. Get your shit together.
I'm not sure that I agree with your argument that every white person, the school included, are secret racists that don't use slurs to appeal to the political Left.
I have been on college campuses in several different capacities, and I can tell you that the students come from a multitude of backgrounds, some of which absolutely include racial bigotry.
Social media has certainly changed the way we deal with social outrage, but I am not so sure it is a bad thing, either. Threats of retaliation are obviously bad, but as previously stated, if she is free to promote racist language, then everyone else is free to condemn her.
But once you bring that word into the equation, you are making racist speech. There's dodge for that, you said an extremely offensive, highly charged racial slur that you know will upset people.
>In response, twittards are calling for her to be a social outcast or worst and somehow you think this is justified.
Her friends and family will stand by her, I am sure. But everyone must face consequences for their actions. If you stood in the middle of campus with a sign about hating African-Americans, I would naturally expect students of that descent to speak up and ostracize you. Your freedom of speech and association stops where theirs does. They are well within their rights to say, "I disagree with this, and this person deserves censure for it."
Seriously /pol/ needs to go on a racist conditioning riot to make people understand that freedom of speech is important to all humans. Blacks can say whatever the fuck they want about me, and I don't give a shit. If anything, it motivates me to be a better person.
I can almost guarantee you that it falls under the hate speech, or related, codes of the institution. The issue is that, if the university did not police this sort of thing, you absolutely would end up with a minority group that felt unwelcome on campus and that they are being marginalized in favor of white students using slurs publicly. If this kind of thing were allowed to pass, it would certainly perpetuate a culture of harrassment that minority students face on campus.
You just cannot say that sort of thing and expect people not to be upset. The word is charged with 200 years of violence and oppression, and its completely incongruous to sit there and say, well I didn't really mean what I wrote, because you know why that word is bad and you used it anyway.
>Hate a college
>pretend to be from said college
>Write on a board about niggers
>Get college in trouble
>Don't even go to said college
>I'd self destruct gloriously
>I'd just move to Europe
HAHAHAHA Self-destruct gloriously indeed!
The sad part is these blacks are just justifying a reason to act like swine. They are literally worse: trying to ruin someone's life vs. writing niggers on a whiteboard. Neither of them are great decisions, but one of them is clearly much worse.
>you can be kicked out of school for making a joke in poor taste
i almost got suspended from my college for making a video game club called "vidya gay men" that actually had some gay people participate
But if it's a state school (which I'm pretty sure it is), they can't impede her constitutional rights, one being freedom of speech. If it were a private school they can do whatever they want, but if it's public, they gotta let her have her rights.
And its not hate speech, it's not speech at all. They're bullet points.
Why can't we walk and chew gum at the same time?
We can condemn the violent racist attacks of the past, and still say that racist hate speech is something that needs to come to an end.
This is the same language that was used to justify the crimes of the past (which really do still exist). That is kind of the core of my point, that this language is specifically offensive because of its history of horrible treatment of African-Americans.
Yes and every time one of these university speech codes gets challenged the courts BTFO. Yet they still keep doing it banking on people not bothering to fight. Jew tactics at their finest
what is it about hardcore reich wing rpublikids and twitter/tumblr/faceblog
why do right wing nut jobs seem so obsessed over social media? Ive never tweeted a hashtag in my life not upvoted a reddit tumbleblog or whatever you fags do.
If a white person were harrassed on campus on the basis of their race, they would be protected by the university's diversity initiative and would be free to file grievance.
However, it seems to me that this is an innumerably less frequent occurance than racial bigotry against Afrifcan-Americans and other racial and ethnic minorities.
Except she wasn't standing in public or making hate speech, she quite literally made a sarcastic joke to what is very likely an incredibly small number of people.
What part of this can you not get through your feeble little mind, it's NOT hate speech, it's a harmless joke which was clearly made public without her consent and willfully interpreted as hate speech by people who want nothing more than to feel tolerant and superior to anyone they can label a racist.
Imagine if she was black, and instead of niggers it said crackers, It would have never been made public, the University would have never punished her for it. Nobody would have cared because anybody who could possibly be offended by it has the mental maturity to get over what was clearly a stupid joke.
Ohhhh I'm going to do it. What is the most liberal college in America?
Let's do Standford or California.
better yet get an asian or latino to do it. Then no one can do shit but complain about the college.
If you would like to address the point I have made, please do. I think you would have a hard time claiming that the N-word is not historically associated with American slavery and the brutality of Jim Crow though, so perhaps that is why you have chosen to not respond seriously.
>reich wing kids getting super mad on pol and declaring it annudah shoah because someone disapproves of their incessant "giggle niggle giggle giggle" rhetoric
when does the false outrage end?
>Why can't we walk and chew gum at the same time?
>We can condemn the violent racist attacks of the past, and still say that racist hate speech is something that needs to come to an end.
lol, I'm glad you've come this far Te'Quantavius. The only racism you're experiencing is indirect slurs posted publicly on the internet. You've arrived.
Gee, how hard is it when someone offers you Watermelon? Do you feel like Malcolm X?
I've been saying this for ages, take all the white sjws who have guilt, make knockoff twitter names with their names and allusions to their jobs and colleges and start being as racist as possible.
Fuck off you nigger loving liberal.
>I'm totes 4 tolerance guize!
>OMG RFRA better burn that pizza shop down, I hate hate lol, gotta be intolerant of intolerance
>In reality, it really is not that different from a private business like a restaurant from banning or censuring you for standing in the middle of the floor and shouting racial obscenities.
Oh so restaurants are private now?
That means they can ban niggers and faggots?
>Except she wasn't standing in public or making hate speech, she quite literally made a sarcastic joke to what is very likely an incredibly small number of people.
How many people does she have to make this "joke" in front of before it becomes unacceptable? Her speech has become public speech by virtue of it appearing on social media. When you post something like that online, it can be expected that your words would reach many, many people on campus.
>it's NOT hate speech, it's a harmless joke
I, and many others, do not feel that the use of the N-word in such a derogatory fashion can qualify as a joke. She could have made plenty of funny jokes without resorting to racial slurs, and she chose not to.
>Imagine if she was black, and . . . it said crackers
White students would have the same ability to file grievance to the Officer of Diversity Affairs (or equivalent at her school). There is postively no double standard here - university anti-discrimination policy extends to people of every background.
I'm sure he would just like to have a civil conversation with the young woman on why a certain race has no effect on why a WiFi system would not be working properly and why parking availability on the campus is also not related to the described technology issues.
so you agree its false outrage or, actually, that you were buttblasted before you got up this morning so it doesnt matter what "evil libruls" do you are a fringe loser/loner and the real issue is your inability to socialize?
funny isn't it? blacks think they can say whatever, which they can, and do whatever they way, which they can't. it amazes me when they do something they aren't allowed to do then respond with the typical "dindo nothing"
See, this is exactly the kind of speech that, if presented on a college campus, would offend African-American students and make them feel unwelcome in the community.
If the school itself and the student body stands by and does nothing, they are complicit in assisting the offender, and will naturally be seen as approving of what the racist has to say.
Therefore, as an African-American, you would of course feel excluded from the campus culture. Thank you for helping me make my point.
You have put words in my mouth and are drawing in completely seperate issues intangible to our discussion. If you can do nothing but resort to personal attacks, I will no longer respectfully respond, but ignore you.
They only get outraged over shit like this because it works. They feel powerless and they want some kind of power over something or someone. Trust me, they're just as aware as you and I that some random chick writing "niggers" on a whiteboard has absolutely no effect on anything.
I have my twitter ready. What can I do to make lols happen?
>I take 4chan.org/boards/pol this seriously
Just fuck off with your cuck white guilt bullshit
That's exactly what it is.
The whole nigger issue is 100% about power. If you can control what someone says you have power over them, at least in some small way. And that's all this is. It's a power thing.
>I, and many others, do not feel that the use of the N-word in such a derogatory fashion can qualify as a joke. She could have made plenty of funny jokes without resorting to racial slurs, and she chose not to.
You're trying so hard to conflate these two things but they are not related.
If I make some joke about chinese people I am not more likely to condone the genocide or enslavement of chinese people.
Words that hurt will always exist, the only real, long-term solution is to nut up.
Haha this fucking black girl retweeted my post. I don't think she understands the term racebaiting.
I'm not seeing that Tweet, I'm wondering if Twitter hides tweets from new users, I've noticed this happen to me before, I created a new Twitter account to tweet something and when I searched for the Tweet it wasn't there even though it showed up on my Twitter home page.
>See, this is exactly the kind of speech that, if presented on a college campus, would offend African-American students and make them feel unwelcome in the community.
yet you subject yourself to /pol/.
Here's some food for thought. It hits on many points so don't read into it in such an singular and obtuse way.
The names of the people who liked this Souls N Substance facebook group...top kek
That is a persecution complex you have, plain and simple. Universities take all accusations of racial harrassment very seriously, and in many cases, are required by law to treat students of all races the same.
You are engaging in a delusion, and all I can say is that you are wrong to think that a white student would be turned away by the diversity officer.
It seems that this counter is only used when there is a dissenting opinion on /pol/, Everyone else can work themselves into a lather about how much they hate jewish people, but when someone presents a cogent response, it's all fedoras and "stop taking things so seriously."
If you want to talk politics, let's talk politics.
>I, and many others, do not feel that the use of the N-word in such a derogatory fashion can qualify as a joke.
Can you give me a tasteful context to use the work "nigger"?
I would be good to know how at parties and in casual conversation.
>facebook and twitter
>the 300 tops clicks it will get from /pol/ will matter
outsider why have you come here?
The piece you linked is a nice way to excuse racially exclusionary behavior. While it is a nice thought that we might look past the surface and see that racial biases have a background in people's lives, nobody is going to call you a racist unless you have given them a reason to in the first place.
This girl has given people such a reason, as using a racial slur. She was always a normal, standard student, but now that she has used hate speech, she is being labeled by people who see the racism that she does not care to conceal.
"Feel" is probably synonymous with "think" in the way I used it. You can get a feeling about something based on your experiences with it.
Well i was assuming you were a troll but since you answered respectfully ( unlike any selfrespecting leftist faggot) i'mma answer you seriously and in a well written manner (inb4 sorry for my english fault)
>I can almost guarantee you that it falls under the hate speech, or related, codes of the institution.
If it did then the code is clearly overstepping it's intended purpose
This is clearly a joke. Nigger don't emit wave that disturb the fuctionning of a wi-fi Network
Here this twiteruser >>43341810
clearly is responding in a joking manners and the fact that they "retwitted" it prove that they do not grasp the concept of humor
> The issue is that, if the university did not police this sort of thing, you absolutely would end up with a minority group that felt unwelcome on campus and that they are being marginalized in favor of white students using slurs publicly.
Quite the contrary. By enforcing this type of speech control group they clearly have created an atmosphere of paranoia and delation where every race/ethnie turns on each other for the most minor bullshit
> You just cannot say that sort of thing and expect people not to be upset. The word is charged with 200 years of violence and oppression
Then every american calling french "white flag" would be chargeable for racisme or discrimination as it's clearly a word charged with hundred of years of violence and oppression faced by the people of france when confronted by international aggression
Same as saying "belgium is not even a country" wich is erasing years and years of oppression endured by my people throughout hundreds of years and worst of all denying the fundamental right of one people to erect itself a nationstate and acquire the right to govern itself wich right have been fought during bloody wars
Except nobody gives a fuck about french and belgian as all of this is just propaganda agains't A type of racist : white toward anything else. And beside everybody know that it's blanter
Well then do it anon. Go up to your nearest university campus at night. Break into the buildings and write your manifesto on all the blackboards.
Be sure to take pictures of yourself next to your work so nobody else can try to steal the credit and upload it on twitter.
You will be an hero to us all and we will erect a statue on /pol/ in your memory.
Use the word Negro. Put "the" in front of it to create an other.
ex. I don't say the N-word because it offends the negros.
Truly you have demolished my argument. I will let a colored gentleman peg me next time as past and future penance for racist thoughts I might have had. I salute you, my intellectual better.
I don't care if he's right. Neither should you.
But you aren't changing people's minds. It's an overly harsh "punishment" while you have fun with your righteous indignation. Yes, I'm accusing you of having fun destroying a person more than you're offended or harmed.
You aren't changing hearts and minds. This isn't a "teaching moment", it's a lynch mob; which is hilarious given the context.
Get out you fucking nigger.
There has been billions
and BILLIONS of threads explaining why Jews are a menace, yet every time you go ''I SEE NO PROOFS HERE'' Or you ''don't see'' those comments explaining why Jews are a menace.
Fuck off shitposter. Go back to Reddit to your original echobox.
>/pol/ is supposed to house "Logical and shrewd" white people
>engaging in the /b/tier shit
/pol/lacks.. you are not what you believe yourself to be..
Wow you really think you're fuckin smart. I understood the way you used it. Guess what? No one gives a fuck about how you think either, not until you have something intelligent to share anyways.
>girl makes a joke among friends
>a buddy snapchats it to a few friends (snapchats auto delete)
>somebody screen shots it and shares it out
>angry blacks and SJWs get a hold of the pic and pull a trayvon
>now this little "joke" will destroy her life
welcome to the future, say hello to our black overlords
Is this a state university? I'm too lazy to give a fuck to look it up but I would assume it is.
If that's the case, the campus has NO RIGHT to judge her based on her freedom of expression. If they punish this girl for writing "niggers" on a whiteboard, then it's a violation of her civil rights. Period.
I'm still upset about the SAE guys getting in trouble for their song, even if they were obviously a bunch of stuck up trust fund kids who probably are SJWs when they aren't drunk. A state institution has NO RIGHT to punish them based on what is, in the United States, beyond all shadow of a doubt established as "free speech."
I hope they all rip the uni's asshole out with a lawsuit.
>Shit if I knew we were the proble with the shitty wifi my black ass would've been fixed it
>WHITE PERSON MAKES PRIVATE JOKE
RACIST HATE SPEECH
>NIGGER MAKES EXACT SAME JOKE
>hardcore reich wing rpublikids and twitter/tumblr/faceblog
Blacks who don't understand sarcasm.._______
>They are well within their rights to say, "I disagree with this, and this person deserves censure for it."
See the first part of that statement is correct. The 2nd part not so much. You tell people you disagree with their opinion you don't try to crucify them for it. Otherwise free speech has little meaning and only popular speech gets protected.
>So because you and your SJW pals don't think it's funny no one else can? How very fascist of you.
You simply cannot expect to use a highly charged racial slur and not be censured for it. That is all I am saying. Of course, I believe that censure is just, but obviously I am alone on this in here.
>This is clearly a joke.
I've said it a few times in this thread, but once you utter such an awful word, you are ceasing a comedy routine and engaging in exclusionary speech.
>By enforcing this type of speech control group they clearly have created an atmosphere of paranoia and delation where every race/ethnie turns on each other for the most minor bullshit
It would be nice if there was no need for such codes, but universities are institutions that pride themselves on creating an atmosphere in which students feel welcome without regard to their race, religion, and background. If you feel paranoid because you can't use a racial slur publicly, that's not the school's problem.
The inclusion of which I speak refers to the idea that no matter how you identify, nobdoy has a right to make you feel like you do not belong on campus.
As for your discussion of other exclusionary terms, I think some of them are a bit extreme, but you are ignoring that the slavery and oppression narratives that the N-word invokes are still highly relevant to America today, and have a direct impact on African-American students.
We as a nation are still struggling with a living legacy of racism and discrimination that has a real effect on everybody. And quite frankly, it baffles me that using racial slurs is what some people are willing to fall on their sword for. Just don't use racial slurs. Full stop. Why is that hard?
Again, I cannot hold a conversation with you if you do not present some talking points that we can respond back and forth about.
The act of censure of hate speech is something that this girl has agreed to in a legally binding contract when she enrolled. She has agreed to limit her free speech on campus as a function of following the school's anti-discrimination policies.
>you are ceasing a comedy routine and engaging in exclusionary speech.
When why do I hear "nigger" on BET so much? Is it true that that is the reason why whites consume more "black culture" than blacks? Does the word "nigger" exclude them and make them feel unwanted? do they change the radio dial, anon?
Newsflash mother fucker... comedians use the word "nigger" all the time. Sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's not. Comedy is often about pushing boundaries, and thank god for it too.
With that said I don't think what she wrote was funny, but what you're saying is just pure bullshit. You're fuckin brainwashed man.
>Again, I cannot hold a conversation with you if you do not present some talking points that we can respond back and forth about.
Nigger that's the first time you said that. Keep your shit together.
That Jewish name is sooo try hard. Why not go with Shoahberg Shekelstein next time?
Removing her first problem would solve the others as well as free up wifi bandwidth.
Blacks understrand the Age of weenies in Indiana came to a friggin screeching halt yesterday!
Did you even finish that sentence? She agreed to abide by the school's hate speech policies in a legally binding contract. She is liable for whatever action the institution decides to take.
There have been many sociological explanations for why African-American use the N-word and what the differences are between a "hard R" and so on. It's a big debate that we can't entertain here, but I think it would suffice to say that when an African-American uses the word, the function is not one of racial exclusion, since that person is him/herself a part of that group. You cannot exclude your own group in that way. If we follow the argument that it is a term in the process of being reclaimed, then in the context you presented, it is not functionally the same as hate speech.
Look, I know that comedians like Louis CK and others use highly charged language to get laughs. But we're dealing with a student to student offense on a campus here. The context is fundamentally different.
>here have been many sociological explanations for why African-American use the N-word and what the differences are between a "hard R" and so on.
LOL, you're over thinking this to the point where you've lost the point.
>If we follow the argument that it is a term in the process of being reclaimed, then in the context you presented, it is not functionally the same as hate speech.
that's rich coming from a self-hating nigger on /pol/.
Oh please, I like that we can talk about this stuff. I'm not upset or anything, its just hard to keep track of who has said what, even with ID's.
Somebody else made a personal attack and I said the same thing to them, so I was just restating my point.
yfw the niggers and media directly reference this thread as support for the girl.
This, no doubt, obnoxious white suburban teen, role-playing as an angry nig-nog on a Akira fan forum page is literally more annoying than anything brought to this site by every Australian and bed-wetting liberal Brits.
Please stop the role-playing. It's tragic and cringe-inducing.
>LOL, you're over thinking this to the point where you've lost the point.
You were generally asking about the mores of the word as it relates to black or white usage. I think I addressed that pretty directly.
>that's rich coming from a self-hating n***** on /pol/.
I have not discussed my own race, and I will not, because it would lend itself to personal attacks like the one you just engaged.
I also am not sure why what I have said is incongruous. If African-Americans are in the process of reclaiming a positive word for negative use, why would it not be different from racialized speech of a white person.
Is it because I do not personally use the word? Because it is not my stance that everyone should follow me, it is a personal decision.
A woman with a functioning sense of humor?
>shut her down
only buttmad fucking retards will get flustered by that pic
His id is CJ13Jla5
Ignore Sequoia threads.
Hide Sequoia posts.
Do not respond to Sequoia posts.
>I have not discussed my own race, and I will not, because it would lend itself to personal attacks like the one you just engaged.
because you're self hating. You defend people calling themselves niggers but you cannot being yourself to use it. You won't even admit to it because you're ashamed.
This is why young Muslim teenagers join ISIS. Grow a spine.
> multicultural board
Is there some meme potential here the Americans have been hiding from us?
lel love when shit like that backfires
craig had to find another job
catch a weenie by teh toe
If he hollers SHOOT HIM! (with your NRA sanctioned ASSAULT RIFLE)
Because Jews programmed them with their victim complex.
So that means they are hyperbolically, disingenously sensitive, they will never be satisfied with anything, and they never are guilty of anything.
>Lol nigger kike
>OMG just a joke don't you get sarcasm? XD
Fucking hell, is this /b/? /pol/ you really are a hive of social retardation. You've spent so long on here, you've apparantly forgotten what's acceptable to say in public. Sarcasm/joke or not, you don't joke with racial slurs unless with friends. Certainly not with students
That sounds like some shit she just made up. "Multicuckular Board" See I made one up too. It's a British thing.
You are making a lot of assumptions for which you have no base, and have continued your personal attack upon me.
African-American reclamation of this word is a good thing, and I do not think that their choice to engage in its usage is problematic.
My race and background has no place in a discussion of racial mores because I believe we should be able to put ourselves aside and understand how racial bigotry has shaped our lives.
I will not respond to your accusations of my own relationship to race, because you do not know anything about me or my life.
I can only restate that students agree to abide by non-discrimination codes of a university when they enroll. She is beholden to that contract with the university and if they find her in violation, she is liable for the consequences.
you got a problem?
>You are making a lot of assumptions
you're making admissions. A "personal attack" on you which is calling out your bullshit and on an anonymous image board for Nepalese comics 4chan none-the-less.
so "personal" I don't even know anything about you other than your dripping with self-loathing about racial issues, specially black concerned ones.
Tell me anon, how do you feel when fellow blacks look down on you for "talking so white"?
All you've done is tell me I'm a self-loathing, angry person. Which isn't true and does not reflect how I have dealt with race in my life. I will not continue to engage with you from here forward unless you want to talk about the issues. We are not talking about me.
>browsing twitter instead of listening to racist professor's eurocentric history lesson
>see a tweet about someone writing nigger
>mummy is a proud liberal
>she contacts the university for me
>another racist put in their place
>a year's worth of good goy points and cuckie tendies heading my way
Normies and non-cucks BTFO
>Say something that another person finds offensive
Well now I'm going to rally thousands of people behind me to hate you, get you verbally attacked everywhere you go by liberal faggots, and kicked out of school.
Even Sweden doesn't do this shit fuuuck me
>All you've done is tell me I'm a self-loathing, angry person. Which isn't true and does not reflect how I have dealt with race in my life.
White people don't "deal with race" it's not an issue.
You also choose to come to /pol/ and make these arguments here of all places. But, it's an anonymous board so you get to get your fill of self degradation and then you can go about your day. It is what it is.
You want to know something that will really get /pol/ angry? "Feelings" sort of are protected at the university level when it comes to racial discrimination.
If you feel that another student, lets say he is African-American, engages in speech that you feel attacks white people because of the color of their skin, you can march right down to the diversity officer and file a complaint.
That's how university non-discrimination works, it ensures that everybody feels welcome on campus. What a truly shocking idea, I know.
Don't even respond to Sequoia. He'll just keep posting ANTIFA bullshit and cuckporn until he gets tuckered out.
Indiana and Arkansas in headlong retreats
Arizona chickened out on this same sick law in "09" They told Brewer she was toast if it past.
SPLC has the names addresses and criminal data on hundreds of Stormweenies
The rethuglican Party has become UNELECTABLE
and you think blacks don't understand???
I like how the Greeks all look like niggers. Kinda like real Greeks.
It is a fucking echo chamber here. I mostly agree with him, I also think he's full of shit and aptly think this isn't the place to discuss positive racial inclusion and multiculturalism.
lol, it's like going on "chimpout" or "stormfront" and expecting understanding. You're not going to find it and you're looking for trouble.
>Yes, she dressed like a whore and should have expected to be raped.
Please answer. Because to white youth it seems like the choice is bewteen cucks like yourself and nationalists like us. If it is more complicated then that tell us or just admit you are spreqding cuckery like all of think progress.
weenie gets hysterical if he thinks his microweenie might get mentioned. How is PEDOPHILIA working out for you CREEP?
I suspect 3 year olds don't laugh as hard as adults.
Unelectable? They have a majority in the House and Senate. Blacks don't understand anything. Though neither do you to be fair.
Blacks just blindly follow a few voices that are ultimately being puppet mastered by kikes from academia.
>you are lucky you don't have to see real oppression and real discrimation
This unecessarily minimizes the fact that a student's use of the N-word on campus is still a racially offensive act.
One of the reasons that African-Americans would be so offended is that implicit in this language is a history of the "real" oppression that you are describing. If this language were still accepted within the public discourse, it would be used to legitimize greater marginalization of minority groups.
Desmond Tutu always said that to be neutrel in cases of oppression is to take the side of the oppressor and I think that is very relevant in the case of Universities enacting non-discrimination codes.
In that way, you support those who are targeted by discrimination and do not stand aside to let offensive language reach a fever pitch.
But that doesn't work. The racism needs power thing caught on. You can say whatever you want about white people and nothing will happen. Go ahead say white people are the cause of all problems and need to be killed. Nothing will happen. If it was the other way around, this shit happens
It is, but pushing people out because their views aren't accepted is one of the most pathetic methods of dealing with codraticting views.
At least you admit it unlike most of the deluded cunts on here.
If /pol/ wants to pridefully claim it's a board open to all views, it needs to cut this shit out. Or at least admit there's a problem
>Wah someone called me a nigger shut it down, cracka
>everyone on the internet is a called a nigger
>their WiFi suffers from too many people on at once because universities hardly ever spend any real money on quality internet service for students
>Go ahead say white people are the cause of all problems and need to be killed. Nothing will happen.
If you go on a college campus and call for racial extermination, you will absolutely be having some very serious meeting with the administration, no questions asked.
The claim you've made is totally outrageous, nobody would ever be tolerated to call for violence on a campus.
In addition, even if there are those that believe that racial minorities cannot be racist, it does not follow in the established codes that they are incapable of discrimination. Students have successfully sued in the past to be included in Black Student Unions in spite of their skin color and have won.
>Yes, she dressed like a whore and should have expected to be raped.
By that reasoning a guy would be subject to the same quid pro quo?
>A word is more important then black on white violence
women in Magic Mormon Underwear make me hard. Can I rape them?
>It is, but pushing people out because their views aren't accepted is one of the most pathetic methods of dealing with codraticting [sic] views.
I didn't "push him out" I questioned his motives. He's here for self-deprecation, not to improve race relations.
And? An echo chamber doesn't necessarily need to be 100% one view, you stupid cunt. Me posting doesn't stop it being one. What matters is that there is one prevailing view that dominates and any dissenting views are shut down by shill accusations, shitposting and redirections.
SJWs get hysterical when there's threads about their sacred cows.
Too bad no amount of cuckporn shitposting and crying about neonazi's will change the fact people of African ancestry are the the scrapings at the bottom of the genetic barrel.
They will still continue murdering and raping at disproportionate rates and /pol/ will keep telling people the truth about your pet niggers.
Is there something incorrect about what I said? You cannot exhort violence on a college campus.
She used a word that she knew was racially charged and, especially since she used it in the prescense of other students, knew that it was going to offend.
Even if the room is full of white people, it doesn't follow that they cannot be offended by the word or that having a small, private audience excuses the speech.
The thread literally is
>ITT: Blacks who don't understand sarcasm
And you say this
>race X shouldn't say word Y but race Z can
you do understand the awesome irony right?
weenie is a confessed pedophile on his bully CONTAINMENT ZONE pulpit pretending to know anything about a wonan over 14.
sick twisted prevert
We invented it, nigger. I refuse to walk around on eggshells for you violent apes.
>This unecessarily minimizes the fact that a student's use of the N-word on campus is still a racially offensive act.
because it is minimal. Call us when a cross is burning in front of your dorm or when your church gets bombed. Otherwise, you're just a touchy pussy looking to experience the oppression of former, greater people before you (for some reason). Maybe you want to feel important and validated by a similar struggle. Either way, you're reaching.
You must have autism, be black, or be very stupid. Why do you hate free speech. Why are you so racist against whites, and finally why are you so incapable of independent thought?
A word can have a statement behind it. If you get up in somebody's face and scream a racial slur, you are invoking ideas of their inferiority and the various negative reinforcing stereotypes about that person's group that the word carries.
Not to mention, on a completely informal level, don't you just want to be nice to people? Why do you want to fall on your sword to make speech that will upset others. I'm not even talking regulations, objective right and wrong under the law, etc. Just being a nice person seems like reason enough not to use a word like the N-word.
>White people shouldn't be using the N-word. Why is that so hard?
I've accidentally gotten more pussy in my life just by being a well mannered gentleman than weenie will ever imagine.
The boy has some serious sexual "issues"
Hey Hey NRA
who are we gonna shoot today?
So nobody is allowed to be upset until the boiling poitn is reached and we are finally back at 1950's levels of racial violence? That is part of the reason that hateful speech is taken so seriously, because to let it pass is to allow the slide back towards that kind of violence.
There is no reason to stand aside and do nothing, because the consequences will be moree dire down the line.
You are making baseless accusations. I have stated clearly in this thread that white students are and should be equally supported if they are victims of racial harrassment.
What part of joke don't you understand. If Chris rock made this exact joke it would be fjnny. Whoever took this picture found it on snapchat after somebody screencapped it, and went out of their way to get offended.
Then why do blacks use the word cracka (cracker) and other racial slurs for whites so freely?
Do you suppose if the races of this were reversed the university would have cared? This is double standard bullshit and you know it.
Blacks are getting special treatment. If some one was a race other than white and they wrote the same thing it wouldn't be as big of a deal.
Sorry to bring you back to reality, but being offended by racialized language on campus is protected everywhere in the United States by codes of non-discrimination.
I refer you to my discussion about just being a decent person.
weenie chimpout imminent
He posts CP when he loses it.
Are you a registered sex offender yet?
Quit buying into propaganda. The only racial violence problem is blacks against blacks and blacks against other races. Look at the government statistics, not Jew media designed to race air viewership and money off of morons like you. There is no systemic racial violence by whites against blacks. That's objectively false
HAHAHA right a beta pussy getting laid. Enjoy your fantasies.
On what do you base this assumption that using the word nigger would eventually lead to 1950's style violence?
Okay then mr dark knight. Play it solo like the supreme gentleman you are.
i make nigger jokes with my friends a lo, but I'm not socially retarded enough to go about doing it publically
would one of the SPLC peeps on /pol/ today please mention to Morris a background check on weenie might yield some fun times?
>So nobody is allowed to be upset until the boiling poitn is reached and we are finally back at 1950's levels of racial violence?
lol, oh man. You're not going to see that Jamal. The worst you're going to get is an asshole cop giving you a steep ticket and an uncomfortable feeling every time you eat fried chicken.
>Then why do blacks use the word cracka (cracker) and other racial slurs for whites so freely?
I personally believe that is objectionable too, and that everybody should just focus on being nice people who don't hurl insults at each other. Idealistic to a fault as that is.
>Do you suppose if the races of this were reversed the university would have cared? This is double standard bullshit and you know it.
No it isn't. Where is the double standard? There have been several high profile cases recently of minority student groups trying to exclude white students and were rebuffed by the administration. If a student makes a claim of racial harrassment, the Diversity office is required to take it seriously and pursue the case.
>Blacks are getting special treatment. If some one was a race other than white and they wrote the same thing it wouldn't be as big of a deal.
African-American students have the exact same rights as students of any other race on campus. If you can point out where any university sanctifies the rights of minority students on campus above the rights of other students, I'd love to see it. But it does not exist.
>These speech codes have been challenged before and every time the courts have ruled that they are unconstitutional.
There is nothing unconstitutional for asking somebody who attends your privately or publicly owned institution from making certain types of speech on campus.
Let's run /pol/ by Reddit Rules. If weenie gets whacky we vote him down.
I would encourage those who do not believe that institutionalized violence and Jim Crow-styled discrimination exists in the modern day to read Michelle Alexander's "The New Jim Crow" and consider what she has to say.
Even if you disagree with her, it is important to consider how a consistently racist legal system and the increasing rights of police to detain suspects and disproportionatly target minorities contribute to higher incarceration rates and recidivism.
mi only fetish is exposing pedoweenies
>The New Jim Crow
The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness is a book by Michelle Alexander, a civil rights litigator and legal scholar. Called the "secular bible for a new social movement" by Cornel West, the book discusses race-related issues specific to African-American males and mass incarceration in the United States — though Alexander notes that the discrimination faced by African-American males is prevalent among other minorities and socio-economically disadvantaged populations. Alexander's central premise, from which the book derives its title, is that "mass incarceration is, metaphorically, the New Jim Crow."
Though the conventional point of view holds that discrimination has mostly ended with the civil rights movement reforms of the 1960s, Alexander claims the U.S. criminal justice system uses the "War on Drugs" as a primary tool for enforcing traditional, as well as new, modes of discrimination and repression. These new modes of racism have lead to not only the highest rate of incarceration in the world, but also an even greater imprisonment of African American men. Were present trends to continue, Alexander writes, the United States will imprison one-third of its African American population. When combined with the fact that whites are more likely to commit drug crimes than people of color, the issue becomes clear for Alexander: "The primary targets of [the penal system's] control can be defined largely by race."
But that's wrong you retard. If it's a public institution they have no right to set standards of speech even if they have students "sign a contract."
It's no different logically than if a public school said basically "All students MUST sign a contract in which they agree to participate in Christian prayer time. Failure to do so will result in punitive actions."
"You might have a right to freedom of religion Anon but when you go to this university you sign an agreement, and they have the right as a public institution to make sure you follow Christian rituals so that Christian students are not offended or threatened by your speech or actions."
This is EXACTLY what you sound like you liberal dousche. What I have created is a perfect logical analogy from the other side of the coin. You just don't realize it because you have no consistency in your ideology. The rules only apply to people you don't like.
>Muh racism is inherit in the system!
>Past two attorney generals are black
>president is black
>Anytime a black thug gets shot by a cop it is headline news for months
>Anytime the more frequent black on white violence happens it is ignored
>Blacks get AA
>Whites get openly and welcomely hated on campus
>Justice department believes you can't commit hate crimes against white people
There is on institutional racism... Against whites
I'm not saying institutionalized racism doesn't exist. I'm saying check your privilege you smooth-talking, educated negro. You're not some nigger named "Shaqwnvius" doing time for shooting up some old folks home looking for crack money.
You're some spoiled brat who has enough time to get philosophical and offended by bullshit racist garbage on right-wing image boards on the internet.
This, ultimately, leads Alexander to believe that mass incarceration is "a stunningly comprehensive and well-disguised system of racialized social control that functions in a manner strikingly similar to Jim Crow." The culmination of this social control is what Alexanders calls a "racial caste system," a type of stratification wherein African-Americans are kept in an inferior position. It's emergence, she believes, is a direct response to The Civil Rights Movement. It is because of this that Alexander argues for issues with mass incarceration to be addressed as issues of racial justice and civil rights. To approach these matters as anything but would be to fortify this new racial caste. Thus, Alexander aims to mobilize the civil rights community to move the incarceration issue to the forefront of its agenda and to provide factual information, data, arguments and a point of reference for those interested in pursuing the issue. Her broader goal is the revamping of the prevailing mentality regarding human rights, equality and equal opportunities in America, to prevent future cyclical recurrence of what she sees as "racial control under changing disguise."
I'm up in arms about /pol/ being socially retarded again and pretending this kind of behaviour is acceptable in public. It isn't. You keep it to friends
>Im calling you a cuck because that's what you are
On what grounds? That you're upset I'm disagreeing with you and want to fish for another who shares your fetish to make peace?
According to the author, what has been altered since the collapse of Jim Crow is not so much the basic structure of US society, as the language used to justify its affairs. She argues that when people of color are disproportionately labeled as "criminals," this allows the unleashing of a whole range of legal discrimination measures in employment, housing, education, public benefits, voting rights, jury duty, and so on.
Alexander explains that it took her years to become fully aware and convinced of the phenomena she describes, despite her professional civil rights background; she expects similar reluctance and disbelief on the part of many of her readers. She believes that the problems besetting African American communities are not merely a passive, collateral side effect of poverty, limited educational opportunity or other factors, but a consequence of purposeful government policies. Alexander has concluded that mass incarceration policies, which were swiftly developed and implemented, are a "comprehensive and well-disguised system of racialized control that functions in a manner strikingly similar to Jim Crow."
>African-American reclamation of this word is a good thing, and I do not think that their choice to engage in its usage is problematic.
Not problematic you say?
Alexander contends that in 1982 the Reagan administration began an escalation of the "War on Drugs," purportedly as a response to a crack cocaine crisis in black ghettos. However this escalation was announced well before crack cocaine arrived in most inner city neighborhoods. During the mid-1980s, as the use of crack cocaine increased to epidemic levels in these neighborhoods, federal drug authorities publicized the problem, using scare tactics to generate support for their already-declared escalation. The government's successful media campaign made possible an unprecedented expansion of law enforcement activities in America's inner city neighborhoods, and this aggressive approach fueled widespread belief in conspiracy theories that posited government plans to destroy the black population.
It looks more like your fetish is trying to emotionally manipulate people because you lack any valid arguments for your position.
>spouting SJW buzzwords constantly
>posting pictures of Neo Nazi degenerates
>trying to shame people into agreeing with you
I could just as easily go through any leftist movement's social media accounts and find degenerates.
I'd rather stick to rational arguments grounded in empiricism. You'll only win over people stupid enough to be ruled solely by their emotions. AKA beta men and most women.
I would encourage you to read Alexander's words on the issue, because I'm not really up for another round of discussion here.
But her explanation, which I agree with, is that frequently sentencing is harsher for African-American offenders and that they might not even have been arrested in the first place by the police if they were white.
So you have the combination of officers that are willing to let two white men have a "dust off", or mututal fisticuffs that ends with nobody being arrested, but will consistently arrest an African-American for something even less violent, and charge him with a disproportionately harsh crime.
Thanks for the summary, its a great book, definately worth reading no matter how you feel about the issues. I don't even agree with Alexander entirely, but her thesis is one that is well-supported and in my opinion, accurate.
In fact, in 1998 the CIA acknowledged that during the 1980s the Contra faction covertly supported by the US in Nicaragua had been involved in smuggling cocaine into the US and distributing it in US cities. Drug Enforcement Administration efforts to expose these illegal activities were blocked by Reagan officials, which contributed to an explosion of crack cocaine consumption in US inner city neighborhoods. More aggressive enforcement of federal drug laws resulted in a dramatic increase in street level arrests for possession. Disparate sentencing policies (the crack cocaine v. powdered cocaine penalty disparity was 100-1 by weight and remains 18-1 even after recent reform efforts) meant that a disproportionate number of inner city residents were charged with felonies and sentenced to long prison terms, because they tended to purchase the more affordable crack version of cocaine, rather than the powdered version commonly consumed in the suburbs.
where are all the cuck images?
banned over 6 months ago cuz smoot sucks cock as much as weenie
Alexander argues that the "War on Drugs" has had a devastating impact on inner city African American communities, on a scale entirely out of proportion to the actual dimensions of criminal activity taking place within these communities. During the past three decades, the US prison population has exploded from 300,000 to more than two million, with the majority of the increase due to drug convictions. This has led to the US having the world's highest incarceration rate. The US incarceration rate is eight times that of Germany, a comparatively developed large democracy. Alexander claims that the US is unparalleled in the world in focusing enforcement of federal drug laws on racial and ethnic minorities. In the capital city of Washington, D.C. three out of four young African American males are expected to serve time in prison. While studies show that quantitatively Americans of different races consume illegal drugs at similar rates,[verification needed] in some states black men have been sent to prison on drug charges at rates twenty to fifty times those of white men. The proportion of African American men with some sort of criminal record approaches 80% in some major US cities, and they become marginalized, part of what Alexander calls "a growing and permanent undercaste."
A black president does not a post-racial society make. Also, much of what that anon presented is either conjecture or outright falsehood and manipulation of the facts.
I will not go point-by-point, but I will focus on his reference to affirmative action, because there is nothing inherently racist about it. The goals of affirmative action are to provide for a type of framework that would politically equalize African-Americans who still feel the effects of slavery, Jim Crow, and the modern system of incarceration that Alexander talks about.
In addition, no white person is hated on campus. We've had this discussion already and that accusation simply is not true. And I'm not even sure why he mentioned the race-related shootings. What does that have to do with racial preference? If somebody is shot for ostensibly racial reasons (which Holder's office found to be the case in the Michael Brown shooting) then the news media is going to report. Its a big event.
Alexander maintains that this undercaste is hidden from view, invisible within a maze of rationalizations, with mass incarceration its most serious manifestation. Alexander borrows from the term "racial caste," as it is commonly used in scientific literature, to create "undercast," denoting a "stigmatized racial group locked into inferior position by law and custom." By mass incarceration she refers to the entire web of laws, rules, policies and customs that make up the criminal justice system and which serve as a gateway to permanent marginalization in the undercast. Once released from prison, new members of this undercast face a "hidden underworld of legalized discrimination and permanent social exclusion."