If you had the ability to remove 5 countries from the world (once you remove a country the population will vanish too), what countries would you pick?
Where ever the hell this guy is from, India, africa (all of it), sweden, sweden
Pakistan or Chechnya, if it counts
That's hard but I would say
China: overpopulation issue, pollution and the fact that they're cruel cunts towards animals.
Algeria: Payback bitches.
Saudi Arabia: More dead sandniggers
To be honest any hardcore country of that type.
Romania: Sorry my nice fellow Romanian friends but the gypsies have to go.
Pakistan: I don't know why. Hardcore muslim country + that will help to stop immigration in the UK.
There's America, then there's The Americas. America wasn't called America until Euros arrived, so the area owned by Euros and post-Euros is America. South and Central America are only named America's cool enough to let them in on having America in their name because America's a pretty cool name.
For real though, Geographical Americas and historical/political America are two completely different things. In a scientific setting, "The US" and "America" are two different things, but in any other setting, "America" refers to the United States.
You guys don't got the balls to drop the hammer. Wish you did, France was pretty fucking beast back in the day. Would of liked you to have kept your empire but you know Cold War stuff..
Saudi Arabia - removing mecca will be close enough to removing kebab
Israel for obvious reasons
And leave Africa alone, they'll find a way to genocide themselves eventually, right after they finish inventing fire
The only red pilled answer is Israel 5 times.
Schlomo plz go.
I'm ok with most European nations
just these ones the world would be better off without
(excluding Africa but I can't take out a entire content)
Afghanistan and Iraq weren't wars.
They only killed 2000 of us not including the towers.
2000. Out of 320,000,000
Meanwhile we razed their buildings and homes back into the hot sand all without super weapons.
That's the point. Their punishment must be more sevear.
ISIS (not technically a country but they are fuckers fuck them)
Saudi Arabia (free oil)
Removing china would cause a massive depression due to the loss of cheap labor
(We all know why)
Since a choice of five countries would not allow us to remove all of Africa and the Middle East, destroying Sweden would serve as an example to those who would continue to import what was left of the muds.
Our greatest ally israel
If I pick Isreal five times will all jews vanish from the world?
If I pick Pakistan five times will all gypsies vanish from the world?
Nothing against any of them, but it's the best way to reduce world population.
Fuck off kike supporter.
Israel because they're insane
China because they're too many
India because they breed too much
Brazil because they're destroying the amazon
Indonesia because they're the biggest muslim country
80% of the world's problems solved instantly.
There's the other 20%. Global average iq goes up 5 points instantly.
Subhuman dog eating mongoloids not welcome here anymore.
Sorry guys you're degenerate as fuck. This should take care of any straggling Kikes.
Fuck your cartel, shit music and degenerate behavior. Leveled.
World is 1000xs better.
Probably should have explained why.
India - Bring our job market down
China - Over running our country with mass immigration, housing market has been inflated to ridiculous levels. They seem to look at white kiwis as slaves as well.
Israel - I hardly have to explain this on /pol/
Tonga/Samoa - Violent sub human apes who mimic American black culture. Of all groups I despise them the most as iv had my fair share of run ins since I was a kid.
Middle East including Israel.
Africa. Yes all of it without regards to borders.
That's pretty much it. Does it remove the native populations of these lands from countries they have immigrated to?
if you wanna lower the world population you kill the indians not the russians lol
in a way india is worst than china because they have the same population but at least china has a one child policy
Sure the Global Economy would take a hit but that's only short term. This would solve more than it would complicate.
Fug u :DDDDD clap clap clap murica so good, so good to be fat :DDDDDD I dont care if I think like a feminist :DDDD give me a small coke for 50 cents :DDD and iT has like 30 cm just the small one :DD oh wait I dont use metric system I'm from MURICA :DDDDD
Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Egypt and South Africa.
It's a perfect plan. The richest (and Iraq because fuck their immigrants) countries removed will create massive turmoil in both Africa and the middle east. They will kill each other faster than ever.
China? I know Brazil is proud and all over the fact it enjoys manufacturing it's things like shoes but the global economy would go into the worst depression ever seen. I wouldn't mind hurting China's economy since they ruined my Uncles factory in Brazil with their cheap manufacturing but I also don't want to set the world's economy 90 years back.
Also son of a bitch, I can't find any Brazilian restaurants that make pastel. Would fucking kill for one.
OP didn't say that we could put our 5 picks together and form a mass removal!
Mmm... muh feels.
The truth is, none of you foreign fags want USA gone really. This world would be a savage wasteland without us.
Instant global F5, what's not to like?
You ain't protecting shit. A chunk the size of Luxembourg is destroyed every year. At this rate the amazon will be a desert by 2050.
Economic recessions happen all the time, and the jew bankers aren't gonna starve in the foreseeable future.
But what you're doing could get us all killed. Learn to use sustainable agriculture like any other country in the world ever. You're literally nigger tier at this point.
Instead of removing people, I think it'd be interesting to see the people shuffled around the lands, like Russians get teleported to Iran, And Americans to Iraq, China's entire population is teleported into Luxembourg, and Luxembourg's population gets the entirety of Russia.
That'd be pretty interesting, I'd bet.
It doesn't have to be one or the other. But first we NEED to make backwater countries in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa to stop reproducing. Then we NEED to enforce stricter environmental laws; in the meantime pour money on physics and engineering research so we can explore the possibility of developing interstellar travel.
With a stable environment and a low enough population we can terraform some other planet.
There's too many muds and useful idiots here. I always wanted to believe it was just the government and a regime change would put us back how this country started but no, it's the people. It's been the people since the 50's, they're the cause of this.
The war on poverty failed because of funding of the Vietnam war. I don't think pouring money into research would last very long because there's always something that pops up that needs money and ends up having important budgets cut to compensate. The same thing will happen eventually. There's no point in getting closer to achieve interstellar space travel if it's going to get cut.
well we don't have to do it now, i mean, it's not like developing ground breaking technology of that magnitute is something that just happens to come out of more spending, though it does help to give incentive. i don't think there's enough incentive.
anyway getting the population growth under control is the outmost priority, and then focusing on letting earth's environment stabilize itself
worst case scenario we stay here until the sun becomes a red giant, which is a far better scenario than dying in 100 years because there's too many mudskins who don't know how to grow crops
2. North Korea
(you're not ready for nukes, sorry)
3. Iran if the current shit isn't resolved, otherwise Syria
(purely self interest, US would ROTFL Stop the EU and whip everyone into shape properly)
(last was a tough choice, but the more growth slows the more like Russia China will become. Unlike Russia, China can actually fuck shit. East Asia can't afford to become militarized.)
>getting rid of persians
>wasting wizard powers on a starving pile of shit known as best korea
A lot of immigrants go to the US and Brazil
Brazil has a significant amount of Japanese and Germans. I even think the German started a small town up north of Brazil post WWII. I'm half American and half Brazilian, just a mut of races. Nothing pure about me, on my fathers side mostly German with a side of Irish, Mother is Brazilian but her grandparents are from Spain and Italy. I would call Brazil the south american version of the US because of how many different ethnicities you guys have. Point is, over population is going to be solved if you don't attack the source, (China was a good choice).
Why? are you pissed they killed that Brazilian drug smuggler. I mean it made Brazil look weak in it's power to protect it's citizens but there's plenty of worse countries that could replace Indotardsia.
>over population is going