>"I'll say it again-it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of A needle than for a rich person to enter the Kingdom of God!"
Where were you when you realized that all Christians are supposed to be fiscally progressive Democrats?
>Am middle class
Woop I don't qualify as rich! Looks like I'm good. Also fuck Obama fuck liberals fuck SJWs. Welp that was easy.
But are you a Christian?
If so, you can't say fuck liberals. Because Jesus called all of us to be liberals. It clearly indicates that being rich and prosperous is bad.
Does this mean all Republicans will burn in Hell?
>rich people put their personal salvation in jeopardy through greed and materialistic obsessions with wealth
>hurrrr that means Jesus wanted the government to take their money and redistribute it
>tfw fiscally progressive and socially conservative
>When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved? 26But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
>to be fiscally progressive Democrats?
Liberals are the most materialistic people around dipshit
>Being forced to help the poor at gunpoint
>Choosing to help the poor of your own free will
One of these things is not like the other, and this is coming from a guy that chooses to work at an orphanage in Honduras and a local food bank in Texas.
In the bible Jesus also says "Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and give to God what belongs to God."
Meaning keep church separate from state.
So your thing doesn't mean that christians should want a larger government because they don't need a larger government in order to help others.
I like how you people don't actually finish the thoughts, you just arbitrarily choose scripture. Literally the next two verses.
> Verse 25 - When the disciples heard this, they were very astonished and said, "Then who can be saved?"
>Verse 26 - And looking at them Jesus said to them, "With people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.
>You don't want the government doing X, therefore you don't want X at all
I know there's a name for this fallacy, it's used all the time by retards and always needs to be called out, but I can't recall it.