If women select the 'best males' instead of us, according to some gleeful sociopaths on here, isn't a thug the wrong choice still?
know what i hate?
when i'm beating it to some doujinshi and out of nowhere they do some wacky shit like nipple fucking.
Whats the appeal of nipple fucking?? Were the orifices God gave us not enough?
should we (not chads) be the ones paying for those "mistakes"? dont we have some value, at all??
It's ok, women will simply breed with thugs and rapists, the very types they claim to despise, and civilization will be burnt to the ground.
Reminds me of all the women I talked to on okcupid who have a rough sex/ choking/ rape fetish.
JFC what ever happened to cuddling.
don't use words like retard. A person needs to have life experience in order to become wise, that's just fact.
Each person makes their own value in life, you decide your own self worth not others, you can't go blaming people especially people you don't even know
Woman's selection of man stems from thousands of years (homo sapiens is around for at least 200k years) of hunter-gatherer life instincts. We only started agriculture and civilisation around 10k years ago. Modern life is only a few hundred years old. The context in which women can afford to choose partners based on mere attraction within the modern world is 50 years old at best and exists only in some parts of the world.
In short, we have created an environment for ourselves in which we are instinctively thoroughly not at home. Fuck ups in 'sensible mate selection' are a side-effect of that.
People who promote evolutionary psychology in these threads [I am one of those people] need to get their shit straight.
One minute they'll say "women are attracted to a successful man who can be an effective provider", but then the next minute when they're paranoid about being cucked by a nignog they'll turn around and say "women are actually attracted to violent aggressive badboys!"