>>24062581 Yeah, but maybe most of the population is still 95% straight. Maybe Johnny Straightguy could get a hardon if he met the perfect man who pushed all his buttons in just the right way. But that's much less likely to happen than him just sticking to women.
>>24062519 I legitimately tried to be gay since I couldnt into girs. Starting talking to this one gay dude I knew who always had a crush on me. It was really weird and he used to send me dick pics on snapchat and I was repulsed by seeing another mans penis but I thought I would eventually get over it. I remember once we were hanging out and he tried to hug me from the back and i remember his chin brushed against my shoulder and once i felt that sandpaper from his shaved chin I realized that I was not gay and could never be. I ghosted him after that, felt bad because the dude taught me a lot about /fa/ and was really cool but i didnt want to continue leading him on because I'm not a stupid girl
>because human sexual triggers are ambiguous, we're going to say that sex isn't gendered and nobody's straight >even though biologically healthy males are specifically attracted to female primary sexual attributes over male ones
>>24062576 I haven't even read the article and i know they're arbitrarily going to say that all people are a little gay, so either gay or bi, but if you tried telling them everyone being bi, even the gay people makes more sense, they'd rage at you
>>24062989 >degenerate Memes aren't arguments, if you can explain how it's subhuman, or explain how it's degenerate and how that qualifies as subhuman, go ahead. >isn't the way humans are meant to live According to who?
>>24063094 Yeah, but let's be real, we're never going to stop using those labels since they're practical. Even if we can detect slight signs of arousal in straight men when exposed to gay porn, or slight signs of arousal in gay men when exposed to straight porn, it's not going to significantly alter their behavior in a way that would require us to restructure our labels.
>>24063121 Au contraire. The labels pretty much only enforce the status quo; having fixed rigid labels makes us also act and treat our own sexualities as if they're fixed or rigid. When they're not. The sooner we get passed the idea of using those labels in that way, the better for everyone. Sexual freedom for everyone.
>>24063188 Fluidity doesn't imply that you're in control of the direction of the flow, merely that there is a flow. Nobody is born straight or gay etc, but that doesn't mean they've chosen to have attractions for the same sex.
Every attention whore should take responsibility for their actions, regardless of sexuality
>>24063470 That's never going to happen. We use overly simplistic, poorly fitting labels in every aspect of life. Look at race - white? black? seriously? Is that supposed to capture the complexity of my heritage? Even the letters of the alphabet are categorized with an imperfect system (vowels, consonants, but what about the letter y?).
>>24063571 Having fluidity DIRECTLY implies choice. It means that you are not solely attracted to one gender or the other, indicating you could pursue either one.
>>24063571 Well you did a shitty job of discussing it. If sexuality is fluid, "gay" as we know it is a singular social construct out of several of which one can identify to be, and is very much a choice.
>>24063682 It's not that they're born bisexual etc, it's that the sexual part of the brain is so primitive that nearly anything can be associated with sexual desire. Of course one of the most common associations is with men, who happen to resemble the human female more than anything else does.
>>24063284 >The sooner we get passed the idea of using those labels in that way, the better for everyone.
Why does this bother me so much? I believe that in the near future all people will exibit bisexual behavior but thinking about it makes me sad. Bisexuality makes me upset. I equate it to decadence of society and I don't know why.
Thread replies: 62 Thread images: 5
Thread DB ID: 79608
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.