Is khan academy a good place to start learning chemistry up the first year undergrad? I want to major in Chemistry, but I want to make sure I cover all highschool material before I go in the fall. I dropped out of my last program because of how much I hated it.
>>7735469 >dropped out because of how much I hated it >I'm going back in!
Why do you do this to yourself. You have enough time to find another potential interest and yet you decide to go back to the shittiest science.
Literally memorize reactions to pass. No critical thinking required.
Tell me that at least you are going into chemical engineering and not pure chemistry because at least in ChemE its less about memorizing reactions and more... Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Why are Americans so butthurt at Europe lately? Is it because they're jelly that all the frontier science (particle physics, fusion, astrophysics, ...) is now being done here? Or more specifically because they haven't been able to catch up in these fields? Or because of the higher educational standards being enforcer here (generally speaking)? At any rate, science is one of the most globalised fields in the world. If you’re unhappy with your own country for the aforementioned reasons, just move instead of being salty little pricks. Jesus.
Everythiiiing... You have to like math to actually get good at it, just like any sport. Ofcourse you can call yourself not a math person because you sometimes can't understand it. Sometimes you understand just the basics. There are somethings the dude says that is true but overall it's all wrong
It's kind of over simplified. There are a lot of things that effect what makes someone "good" at math. I do think his core point, that anyone can get good at math, is largely correct (barring actual problems with the brain, like being too senile or having particular mental disabilities). I think it does a bad job of actually explaining why some people are bad at math, and others are good. There are a lot of reason that are more complex than just laziness. There are two which matter a lot which come to mind right now: 1) Who's teaching you, especially... Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>7735604 But he is talking in a general sense. Math is segragated for the geniuses and the cold calculative people because that's what we present. Kids want to explore discover be challenged, but we make them do 20 problems in their home then 5/10 problems in their exams and tata math.
Hello /sci/ I recently quit smoking cigarettes by moving to a Vaporizer.
I tried to find some actual medical studies via google, but I guess I just don't know what to look for, because I can't find any articles that are just hard facts without shit-loads of bias.
Do any of you happen to have links to real medical study results or any insights into the effects of the standard Vaporizer chemicals(Vegetable Glycerin, Propylene glycol, Nicotine, and food-grade flavoring) on the lungs?
The reason you can't find anything is because it's barely been studied so far. Personally I wouldn't risk putting that shit in my body until there's solid science confirming it's harmless. (And also I don't want to be chemically dependent on an expensive habit that makes me look like a tool, but that's neither here nor there.)
Math major here looking to learn some physics on the side. So far all of the physics textbooks I've read have all felt a bit too... "hand-wavy". It's a bit difficult to explain, but they don't feel formal enough. It just feels like a bunch of disjointed information and ways to model it.
So I'm looking for a textbook that does this physics thing a bit more rigorously. Definitions, with motivation, and then builds upon that every step of the way. Is there a name for this approach by the way? Is it a stupid way to go about things, or no?
Hi /sci/ I'm dating a girl, and about a week ago I did the non-newton fluid experiment with potato starch and water, you know, the one that if you punch it feels like a wall but if you slowly put your finger in feels like liquid water. She liked it a lot and asked me to show her more "cool science stuff" like that (she has very little background in that). Now, the thing is, I've been doing a lot of "homescience" stuff in the past with my geek friends, but since I am getting a PhD in mathematics soon I kind of left all that stuff behind (I... Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
1) this isn't /r9k/ 2) I haven't had sex in four years and she'll probably leave me soon, I just liked the happiness I saw in her eyes while she was playing with that 3) care to elaborate? If you mean that "it burns" and stuff... how is that exciting? Might as well light up some fireworks.
It's not at all supported by the fossil record. The most water that any recent ancestor of ours was exposed to was due to fishing or being in the rain or whatever... but that's not at all the same thing.
>>7735019 this is actually very easy. you'll need an automotive battery (contains sulphuric acid), about two pounds of bitter almonds(preferably finely ground although coarse will work too), a cooking-pot and a stove. now just put the ground almonds in a cooking-pot, add about 350 ml of sulphuric acid and 150 ml of water(always add the acid first, then the water), and apply medium heat. stir vigorously for 5 minutes, remove the pot from the stove and let it cool. finally filter the mixture through a cheesecloth and you'll... Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Please tell me there is a very good chance that we may discover life on the dwarf-planet of Pluto?
This world seems too alive for there not to be any such life whatsoever. I do not mean extraterrestrials, of course, I mean some advanced form of extremophiles and microrbs.
Ever since NASA made the announcement that this little dwarf has it's own mountain ranges, lakes, ice caps, craters, it's own weather system, and blue skies, I've been intrigued on rather or not life could exist on it.
It seems like all of the conditions could be there.
This is a simple combination problem because mushroom/tomato is the same as tomato/mushroom. There are [math]C(50, 50)[/math] ways to choose 50 toppings from 50, there are [math]C(50, 49)[/math] ways to choose 49 toppings from 50, etc.
With three topping choices you can either choose three toppings or choose two toppings or choose one topping. There are [math]C(3,3)[/math] ways to choose three toppings, [math]C(3,2)[/math] ways to choose two toppings, and [math]C(3,1)[/math] ways to choose one topping. That means there are [eqn]C(3,3) + C(3,2) + C(3,1) = 7[/eqn] ways to choose toppings.
Your factorial answer [math]3 \times 2 \times 1[/math] is not correct. It's a combination problem.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at email@example.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.