Division

Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network issues. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread images: 4

Anonymous

Division 2015-11-08 04:02:06 Post No. 7645341

[Report] Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]

Division 2015-11-08 04:02:06 Post No. 7645341

[Report] Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]

What is division?

>>

>>7645341

The ratio of one object and another in a common basis

>>

>>7645343

Is it the most complex of arithmetic operations?

>>

>>7645347

No, it is an extension of multiplication, in the same way subtraction is the addition of negative numbers (addition of inverse quantities), division is multiplication by inverse quantities.

>>

Isn't every possible change to a number, whether it be by multiplication or division or what have you, addition?

>>

>>7645357

Addition, and multiplication have definitions that go beyond numbers. For example, vectors defined by a radius and angle, there is an addition and multiplication that follows the same rules as the addition and multiplication of numbers but gives different results.

Addition and multiplication are operations on objects that follow specific rules, and while they may simplifiy to arithmetic when dealing with numbers that is not true for all objects.

>>

>>7645365

Huh, that's interesting.

Thank you for clearing that up for me.

>>

OP here. Thank you for the helpful replies.

>>

>>7645341

Glorified Subtraction.

>>

>>7645418

Division cannot possibly be to subtraction what multiplication:addition, because for 3/5, for example, how would you "subtract" 5 from 3 to get .6?

>>

>>7645426

Think about it.

>>

>>7645426

No way you're this dumb

>>

how many x fit into y

>>

>>7645426

3/5 is equal to subtracting 0.6 from 3 five times.

>>

>>7645341

Reciprocal of multiplication.

>>

>>7645365

Pls explain

>>

>>7645646

TIL 3/5 = 0

>>

>>7645688

Since you're obviously mentally retarded I'll make this real easy for you to understand.

Let's take 20/5, which equals 4. This is the same as subtracting 4 from 20 five times.

20 -4 - 4 - 4 - 4 - 4 = 0

Same with 3/5

3 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 = 0

This doesn't mean 3/5 equals 0 as you erroneously stated, but rather that subtracting 0.6 from 3 five times equals 0. Now stop posting because you just got BTFO.

>>

division is chained subtraction

that's all

>>

>>7645341

The amount of times the negation of the dividend can be added until the result is equal to zero.

>>

>>7645804

divisor*

>>

>>7645341

The undo button for multiplication

>>

>>7645341

inverse multiplication

>>

>>7645341

Splitting.

>>

>>7645341

for each number a except 0,

there is a (unique) number "a^-1" surch as

a*(a^-1)=(a^-1)*a=1

where 1 is the (unique) number surch as for each b, 1*b=b*1=b.

so b/a means b*(a^-1)

>>

a/b

how many groups of b fit into a?

if a the area of a rectangle, and b is the length/width of the rectangle, what is the width/length of the rectangle?

>>

Take a class in abstract algebra, all of you, please.

Division (on real numbers) isn't really division at all as the real numbers are a field over only addition and multiplication. Divison can't be properly defined due to the presence of 0. Dividing by a is just a shorthand way of saying multiply by 1/a

>>

>>7645352

But inversion is a division itself right?

>>

>>7646393

inversion is dividing unity by the thing you're inverting

>>

>>7646393

a^(-1) is defined as the number such that a*a^(-1) = 1. You don't need to divide anything.

>>

>>7645711

This anon wen't all out

Respect

>>

>>7646359

You mean "multiplying by 1 divided by a"?

>>

>>7646393

algebraically, inversion is a group involutive automorphism.

Now assuming your group is abelian.

"division by a" could be defined as the composite morphism of multiplication by inverse of a.

>>7646359

>Division (on real numbers) isn't really division at all as the real numbers are a field over only addition and multiplication.

????

>Divison can't be properly defined due to the presence of 0.

It can, but it requires to use Projective line. Define inf = 1/0. Then 1/inf = 0, and for any a in R, a+inf = (a*0+1)/0=1/0=inf, as one would imagine.

>>

>2015

>saying "division" instead of just multiplication by an inverse

>shiggydoo

>>

>>7646530

You didn't answer the first question, and as you well know inf is not a value in R

>>

>>7646506

"1/a" is just notation used for a multiplicative inverse.

>>

>>7646530

>algebraically, inversion is a group involutive automorphism.

I just had a taste of abstract algebra this semester. I can't fucking wait to sound this pretentious to laymen.

Thread images: 4

Thread DB ID: 76877

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.

If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at wtabusse@gmail.com with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.