+Bloodborne is a game funded and owned by Sony, exact same situation as Demons Souls.
+Development started roght after Artorias DLC was completed.
+Made by the same exact team as Demons/Dark 1.
+Was PS4 game from the start.
+Project Beast trailer is one year old and was pre alpha, Bloodborne shown at E3 was alpha.
+Full customization and creation, alongside gender.
+No more classic "classes", this time there will be archetypes of characters.
+Game has NO shields, such equipment piece does not exist.
+Miyazaki wants every battle to be a struggle and challenge.
+Game has dashing and rolling as evade movement, much faster than Souls games.
+Huge emphasis on dual wielding.
+Guns are meant to stun, not to deal huge damage.
+Little to no magic.
+Gadgets and such replacing magic.
+Miyazaki wants interesting items to dominate healing consumables.
+Most of the weapons have two modes that you activate by pressing triangle, you can modify almost every weapon.
+Using torch and lantern will be crucial, pitch black areas.
+Souls are in and will be used for standard character improvement.
+Game will be longer than Demons Souls.
+Clocktower "bong" serves as enemy swapper, they change locations and respawn.
+There is blood meter/gauge.
+Game has two types of blood.
+Tainted blood is everywhere and is used to boost and improve your character.
+Pure blood is only carried by living humans such as players as NPCs.
+Absoring too much tainted blood will turn you into beast.
+In beast mode whole game changes from visual to gameplay.
+To return to human form you have to get pure blood, and you can do that by hunting other players online.
+Basically Souls gameplay but instead of ghosts of players, you will see ACTUAL players running around in your world.
REMINDER TO REPORT, HIDE AND IGNORE ALL SHITPOSTING
>+Game has NO shields, such equipment piece does not exist.
I saw shields in the E3 gameplay videos, it wasn't the player using it at the time, but there are shields in the game.
>How is it shittoasting?
>>Bloodborne - Everything we know so far.
He's probably a troll who thinks any thread with info about a game is "viral shitposting".
I recommend reporting HIM for shitposting.
I thought they made Dark Souls to get out of PS exclusivity, and now they are going back into it with Bloodborne. I don't get it, I guess Sony gave them a bunch of cash on top of publishing the game. Don't really see why though, Souls games are never major sellers, good sellers but not major.
>+Bloodborne is a game funded and owned by Sony, exact same situation as Demons Souls.
This already came clear at E3, how can people be this fucking dense?
It's exclusive, don't worry about it though, they will probably slap out a Darkborne multiplat a year and a half after Bloodborne releases, it's just too much money for them, unless they are actually fans of Sony systems.
i'm tempted to buy a ps4 for this but it's the only game that interest me in that shitty console, even the xbone have more interesting titles
i hope they either release more interesting games for the ps4 or the game doesn't reach 60 fps
because everything under 60 fps is not worth to play nor to buy, 60 fps should be the standard and nintendo proves once again to be the best at maintaining that, if only the wii u didn't had such shitty hardware
REMINDER TO REPORT, HIDE AND IGNORE ALL SHITPOSTING FROM ANY AND ALL PARTIES
>+Development started roght after Artorias DLC was completed.
Why the fuck did they show an alpha build that ran like shit then? I'm starting to think that this famous "team A" is just a buzzword for desperate ps4 only people that grasp every little straw of hope of not getting another shit game after blunder souls 2.
We should call this one Blunderbourne, you know, just in case it's actually a blunder and the only interesting game for ps4 turns out to be complete shit.
>/v/ has been nothing but Bloodborne consolewar threads and Splatoon porn threads.
I wonder when it will end. Also:
>+Using torch and lantern will be crucial, pitch black areas.
Didn't they say the same shit about DaS2? I beat that game literally without once lighting a torch.
yeah that's why DeS is on pc OH WAIT!
because it sold good, Major is like 8 mil+, Demon Souls was like 1.8 mill total. if it cost more than 60 mil to make and advertise, they are wasting their money. I doubt Demon souls cost even more than 20.
Not that I care, I just want to play the game, pref on PC though.
>tfw hyped for bloodborne but don't even own a ps4
A REMINDER TO REPORT, HIDE AND IGNORE ALL SHITPOSTING FROM ANY AND ALL PARTIES
They said a lot of things about DaS II.
>Bloodborne threads will never be as friendly and comfy as DeS threads were
>made by the exact same team some of whom also happened to be working on dark souls 2, but it's okay because you can believe me!
>was a ps4 game from the start- because the trailer from tgs surely looks like a ps4 title and not a crossgen game which has been revved up a gen last minute to make people buy the ps4!
>instead of ghosts you will see ACTUAL players, so basically opaque ghosts.
The game is also confirmed not to have a standard open world structure, you are probably going to respond by stating "dark souls 2" but read it within the context of the question, it means open world in general.
Sure it might have demons souls level design with varying obstacles, but not a large interconnected city.
Yeah but that's Sonys problem, Sony are footing the bill here and making the money, I doubt they will port to PC
But only Souls Fans you are talking just a fraction of PS fans, and a lot of them would be die hard, or cross over with many other PS exclusives, it will move units but probably about 200,000 to 1 mil. Like GTAV PC fans will hold out for Darkborne.
and then pirate it, like I'm doing with GTAV
You do know it's not about coding right? to have higher FPS you need higher Performance, that is only achieved by lowering the graphical settings or upgrading the hardware. The trailer shown at E3 already showed some scenes where the FPS was lower than 30.
>wait for the pc version with me
No thanks, I'm not as delusional as you buddy.
The butthurt over this game is truly hilarious.
First it didn't exist. Now its an exclusive and its the typical fox/grapes rhetoric we all know and love.
Stay bitter. Its not like you wanted those grapes anyway.
Why should they be trusted now?
mah nigga. Favorite Kurosawa film?
>show private pre-alpha of a pre-alpha game running at slideshow fps in single player
>multiplayer will be a clusterfuck
>gorillion E3 awards for basically a tech demo
BUTTERY MOVIE POPCORN SLICK 30FPS target
CINEMATIC dips TO 24fps
Jaw-dropping slideshow 10fps
I played DeS 2 days ago and I got summoned for the flame lurker twice, got invaded once, and was the Old Monk boss 3 times in a row while trying to get summoned for the maneaters. You dumb.
All of you faggots went crazy after Dark Souls and DSII went PC. You all hated on it and the. It came out on PC and suddenly you loved the series. Now an exclusive successor is revealed and you all hate on the series again.
You're all such tryhards these days.
>Trying to have a Bloodborne thread on /v/
You're going to have to wait until all the people without a PS4 manage to overcome their massive level of asspain long enough to have a constructive thread without shitposting.
>+Tainted blood is everywhere and is used to boost and improve your character.
>+Pure blood is only carried by living humans such as players as NPCs.
>+Absoring too much tainted blood will turn you into beast.
>+In beast mode whole game changes from visual to gameplay.
>+To return to human form you have to get pure blood, and you can do that by hunting other players online.
Don't own a PS4 and probably never will, but that sounds like a really interesting game mechanic.
The game is meant to be played that way. Stop thinking developers need to cater to everyone, they designed the game with a specific right way to playing it and there is a wrong way to play it, which is offline. They tried to make that point clear with Dark Souls 2 by adding the sentinels covenant so players that thought invading random people was a ''bad guy move'' could invade, and when you play offline there are triggered NPC invasions so you can still have the same experience as anyone else.
>Collecting too much tainted blood turns you into a beast
>In order to become normal again you need pure blood
>Pure blood is gained by killing other players through online
>PS4 online isn't free
This game better have an alternative OR have free online.
If you need to pay to literally collect pure blood, imma have a good laff
I trust Miyazaki to deliver the goods
I think the DaSII beta had dynamic lighting, so it was a failure to keep a promise instead of an outright lie.
A tie between Seven Samurai and The Hidden Fortress. Yours?
Bloodborne is going to be a huge success and there is nothing you idiots can do about it
Miyazaki will be permanently in the hands of Sony from now on, and PC fags will be stuck with B team souls.
FOR A BETTER /v/ REPORT, HIDE AND IGNORE ALL SHITPOSTING FROM ANY AND ALL PARTIES
When will 2/5 of /v/ understabd that the reason the other 3/5 of /v/ hate this game solely because its PS4 exclusive. If this was also on Xbone/PC, then this would universally praised as GOTYAY
I'm sure there will be a blood vial item or something. Just like how there was stone of ephemeral eyes in DeS, humanity in DaS, and effigies in DaSII.
I have a ps4 Im not trying to sound diffucult BUT make threads when the game actually has a beta I can play. Or a demo on youtube.
I have a question. Where the fuck did Shadow of the Beast, Rime, Rapture fucking go?
>When will 2/5 of /v/ understabd that the reason the other 3/5 of /v/ praise this game solely because its PS4 exclusive. If this was also on Xbone/PC, then this would universally praised as GARBAGE
The game,like all other Souls games, is meant to be played online. Get that straight in your head, Interaction with other players is essential to have the full Souls experience.
I'm sure you never really need to have pure blood. Also I expect some uncommon/rare items that purify blood and NPC enemies with pure blood.
I can't fathom how lonely Souls must feel offline, though.
>+Game has NO shields, such equipment piece does not exist.
>+Miyazaki wants every battle to be a struggle and challenge.
>+Game has dashing and rolling as evade movement, much faster than Souls games.
>+Huge emphasis on dual wielding.
>+Guns are meant to stun, not to deal huge damage.
>+Little to no magic.
>+Gadgets and such replacing magic.
>+Miyazaki wants interesting items to dominate healing consumables.
so there's no reason to enter beast mode?
>, you will see ACTUAL players running around in your world.
that would be more of a mess actually dependng on how they implement it.
>The game,like all other Souls games, is meant to be played online.
Wrong, it can be played online, but it's not mandatory. It was NEVER mandatory.
> Interaction with other players is essential to have the full Souls experience.
If the interactions weren't laggy, annoying, cheap and not fair i would agree 100%.
But considering the game is filled with this annoying shit, i don't need it.
If their game is designed in a way that you can only play it if they pull their eye-balls out, then let them create their own game. Nothing is for everyone, that mentality is why we have so many dark and gritty/edgy characters and stories.
It never works out better.
However it depends. If they make the controls feel floaty then it should be fine.
If they make it very stiff then its shit.
Compare Killzone 2 vs Killzone 3. Both are 30fps. But the later actually feels playable.
You watch E3 for weeb games? Are you THAT new?
TGS is the only place to watch weeb games. Also, Splatoon looks fun but hardly counts as a weeb game. It has little girls to cater to actual little girls, not pedophiles.
I already own a Wii U though, and I'm buying a PS4 this week specifically for bloodborne. Feels good not being poor.
There's more pctards in this thread than sonyggers so I guess its a
for them because thats exactly the truth.
You are mad because you are not getting it, jelly because this is porbably going to kick ass, and you will never ever get it because its co developed by sony exclusively for ps4. How is saying the truth shit posting? Time to get a ps4, and shut the fuck up
>sunset overdrive threads with 900p 30fps
>meanwhile bloodborn has 900p and doesn't even reach 20fps
DaSII's team made so many decisions that Miyazaki would never have approved. So many of the boss/enemy/world designs went against his aesthetic too.
I tend not to follow Devs, either as studios or individuals, so all of this seems like fluffy PR talk to me. I like to judge the game on its own when its out, unaffected by hype and marketing. I don't always succeed, that's for sure tho.
A tie between Yojimbo and Rashomon, 7 Samurai and Ikiru are pretty close. Haven't seen the Hidden Fortress, is it that good?
Meanwhile on sunset overdrive
>The game will run at 900p and 30fps on the Xbox One, Ryan Schneider confirmed to GamingBolt. We also asked them whether there is a chance of a resolution upgrade later on, but it seems it’s not on their radar for the time being.
>“If you play the game and see the experience, we are pretty comfortable where we are in terms of frame rate and resolution wise. We rather just focus on optimizing what you can see on the screen and that we think will create a better experience overall,” Ryan explained.
How come nobody's making a big deal out of this? Also bloodborne is confirmed to run at 1080p
Why are there so many PCfriends and Nintendofriends in this thread? Don't you guys have any games to talk about on your own systems? Why are your grapes so sour that you spend every day trying to shit post in Bloodborne threads? It's not our fault that nobody makes any good games for PC/Wii U.
>If the interactions weren't laggy, annoying, cheap and not fair i would agree 100%.
Im sure the power of the ps4 and online it wont be bad at all. I think players would be able to join your game flawlessly without it slowing down or being laggy.
Sony already said they're gonna keep at it with the Japanese games and Vita is weebgame galore. Nintendo has never been weeb and even their most weeb games like Fire Emblem still feel pretty normalfag in comparison to the oktaku stuff on vita.
Sunset Overdrive doesn't seem to ask as much from the hardware as Demon's though. I'm not saying that SO is ugly, but that the cartoony arstistic style is easier to draw into polygons and textures than Bloodborne's more realistic look.
son you are forgetting how many Armored Core fans are on /v/.
when did it drop to 15? a couple of hours ago all the shitposters were whining about 20
>mfw people are even considering something like framerate when they haven't seen review gameplay or played it for themselves just because some random cunt with no credibility reported it dropped to 20 when he was playing a demo at e3
Thanks for getting rid of this guy, mods/janitors.
I hear this all the time, but I thought Miyazaki was the supervisor during DS2's development; am I wrong? Also, I think there was an image that showed that about 60% of the team was the same.
and a Wii U, and two PCs that are faster than yours.
I just don't understand all the hate directed as this game just because you guys can't play it. There are games you can't play every generation if you don't want to buy a console. Get over it.
I'm not saying he's immune to mistakes, I mean it will probably be more like DaS and DeS.
>Bloodborne is 900p
Source on that? You have a link?
My guess is it will be like DaS and Blightown. The game never really dropped from 30 fps for me until I got to Blightown and only there. Hopefully they will learn from that mistake.
i don't like the whole blood/online bullshit, sounds like they're just forcing you to PVP eventually with no avoiding it. also don't like the "clocl bong" mechanic and the lantern/torch stuff, but it might be okay. overall i hated dark souls and thought it was one of the worst games i'd ever played but i'm kinda excited for this with the changes they're making. the only thing the souls games had going for them was a good art direction and the fact that all the weapons were pretty unique and had different attacks, but the combat in this one actually looks fun.
Their spec goals are 1080p 30fps
pic unrelated, i just like it
>doesn't seem to ask as much from the hardware as Demon's though
>but that the cartoony arstistic style is easier to draw into polygons and textures
oh you are tech iliterate, should have said sooner.
>naming two games and one of them is getting a few games+spin off on vita
Try harder, your system will forever be normalfag territory.
My interest was pretty much destroyed when they confirmed it wasn't an open world. Demons souls benefited because it had different environments, I'm betting this will just feel like levels.
Falling for bait. I will never understand why some of you guys love to spread misinformation on games.
But bloodborne runs at 1080P 30FPS.
You know what? I didn't care (or really even know) about Bloodborne until E3, and even after seeing it felt a little meh.
But yesterday, I inexplicably got the craving for a certain old game...
And suddenly my hype boner for BB is through the roof.
>no more faggot turtles
>no more casual shitters running around with shields and lock on telling others to git gud because they made the mistake of thinking theyre good when theyre playing the easiest possible way to play the game
holy fuck this is amazing
It's sure to be a high octane visceral and cinematic experience that will revolutionise video games. Pre-order today!
Yes, although I like it more than most people. I recommend it.
>drops to 15 for 3 seconds while the new area loads
>back to 30 when in combat
WOW, it's fucking nothing.
They'll easily have it at a rock solid 30 by the end of summer, not 2015.
Thanks for confirming all this "muh FPS" bullshit was just an exageration.
LBP3 is on PS3, so it's not an exclusive.
Also Let it Die, but it looks like Sony made Suda completely butcher the vision he had going for him with Lily, just to be able to cater to a western audience.
And? I can play multiplats on my PC, pic related.
The PS4 had nothing going for it this E3 except this game. Nintendo blew Sony the fuck out pretty easily, which is unfortunate because I wanted to have more PS4 games actually announced this E3 to give my dusty console something to play.
THAT'S THE FIRST THING THAT POPPED INTO MY HEAD WHEN I SAW THE TRAILER!!!! NIGHTMARE CREATURES 4 BITCHES!!!!
>one of them is getting a few games+spin off on vita
you mean like Senran Kagura 2: Shinku for the 3DS?
>your system will forever be normalfag territory.
good i won't be confused for one of those pedophiles that used the 3DS' swapnotes to take pics of my dick to show to children
if you actually read my post/weren't retarded you would see that i praised the art style and said i was pleased with the combat improvements for the new game. the combat actually looks fast and fun this time around instead of slow, clunky, and shield heavy.
Oops, forgot my speccy pic
i5 is clocked to 4.5 ghz
you're forgetting most people on here are underage or poor as fuck
id be surprised if they are removed, being as though theyve been a staple of the combat for the entire series
You guys are like man children. I cant tell if you're joking or just this stupid.
The game wont come out till sometime next year. Why the hell would you think the game would be running smoothly now. Thats also why it was press only, its not meant for public eyes, cause of people like you and others.
Frame rate optimization happens towards the end of the development cycle.
This game sounds (doesn't look yet) very good,
but I'm still a bit disappointed in PS4.
I don't have anything to buy for it in what looks like over a year (this, Phantom Pain, maybe KH 3 and FF XIV)
>Clocktower "bong" serves as enemy swapper, they change locations and respawn.
Okay, but I'm just letting you know I've seen the demo and the gameplay is identical to Dark Souls. It's not faster, the animations are different and all the footage we saw was dual wield based - but it looked identical to playing a dual wield build in any of the other souls games.
actually that's what miyazaki wants
instead of a slower and defensive aproach
he rewards the one that strike first against enemies.
im not sure this is the right way to take the concept of souls, while i find a more offensive play being rewarded more taking out defensive options is not the real way to do it.
Or you know, the game was codeveloped with Japan Studio, one of Sony's long running 1st party developers, meaning the game is never going to make if off of sony systems just like Demons Souls.
>+Game has NO shields, such equipment piece does not exist.
Prepare to enter a new era of 'git gud'.
No more babby mode shields that block 100% physical damage.
Holy shit Mifune is in it and i haven't seen it? I fucking love that guy, he made Yojimbo and Sanjuro and arguably Rashomon. Thanks m8 downloading it now, have some Zatoichi, he is pretty cool too.
REMINDER TO REPORT, HIDE AND IGNORE ALL SHITPOSTING
I was thinking about shinovi versus and the cooking game. but if you're happy with getting a few weeb games then that's good for you, just don't pretend nintendo is a weeb machine when it never was nor does it try to be. :^)
Yeah, I guess it might have been 25.
Still fantastic for an alpha/early beta
It's clear that Miyazaki has learned from DaS1 and Blightown, he even said he considered DaS1 a failiure on consoles because of Blightown's FPS.
Fucking BASED as fuck.
Yea, just look at all that Suda games with a generic brown n bloom western art style.
Oh wait, there are none. Oh wait, he also inserts a shit ton of Japanese culture into his games.
Itageki is the westaboo you're thinking of m8, keep up with Japanese developers.
It is, AND it's outsourced m8. It will be the worst game in the series.
there is more emphasis on movement and evasion, so what is likely to happen is everyone who cant react will get shit on immensely because they can't just turtle and poke in full havels, and everyone that is actually good will just roll around missing eachother for 30 minutes until one wins
good ol DeS pvp revival
>Frame rate optimization happens towards the end of the development cycle.
optimization happens togheter with the development it's part of it. Bug fixes come at the end, stop saying optimization comes at last that's like 4 times the work if you leave it at last
Because 4k 60 fps monitors aren't being made yet you little dumb shit. I'm not going to upgrade to a 1440 set up just to upgrade yet again in a few years when affordable 4k monitors hit the market. Also, games like Witcher 3 are going to push the card to its limits even at 1080.
He was referring to the Link vs. Kid Icarus short you complete retard.
Actually I'm sure there will be a ton of scrubs crying about no shields.
From should troll them by adding lots plank shields that break in 20 hits (unrepairable), basically like a shield consumable.
Should we report you for avatarfagging/spamming since the start of the thread as well? Agreed tho, all shitposters must be purged.
PvP was not even confirmed.
Personally I hope that there won't be any invasions/PvP as it used to be. Because that always attracts the worst kind of players.
Maybe make it something like RE6. This is one of the few things that this game got right.
No it won't. 4K 60 FPS monitors ARE being made, and you're still a retard for buying a 780 to power a baby monitor.
I thought I was overkilling it with my 780Ti for just a standard 2560x1400 x2 setup. Holy shit.
It's funny cause you could have spent some of the extra waste cash on a PS4. Maybe then you wouldn't be so salty about not getting to play Bloodborne.
If you think Suda is a westaboo, you're a retard.
His game was originally going to be a full priced title.
It originally had a very distinct style somewhat similar to Guilty Gear.
Now it's being pushed as a f2p game with a very generic western art style.
That is not something Suda would do.
Because art overpowers technology every time when it comes to aesthetics? Same reason why Demon Souls & Dark Souls were the best looking games of last generation despite being horribly coded. Same reason why Bloodborne will be the best looking game of this generation despite being horribly coded.
i saw it too and it looked 3 times as fast as any souls game
obviously not the frame rate but the actual gameplayeven with dual wielding. that and the fact that there's (supposedly) no shields and improved dodge mechanics makes it seem like it was meant to be played fast and hard instead of the god awful slow poke gameplay of the previous games.
>id be surprised if they are removed, being as though theyve been a staple of the combat for the entire series
Combat looks much faster now and it would be too easy to get behind enemies now
rolling, fatser movement shit like sidesteps on mid attack help to get over defensive play. I dont know why remove it, tough. just rollling around to see who hits who first and win isnt that fun.
smae for taking out magic. he is enforcing a playstyle and i dont agree with that, might make the pvp less versatile than ever.
I have a PS4 you idiot, why do you think I said I was so disappointed at how poor of a showing Sony gave it this year? Nintendo destroyed them, it was sad because now my PS4 will continue to collect dust until Bloodborne.
Honest question from a Nintendofriend:
Is there anyone legitimately excited for this game or are you all just being ironic?
I mean, it just seems like the exact same thing as before, but with certain features removed. Like a stable framerate
>best looking games of the last generation
i think you mean worst not best. sure they had good art design but graphically they were all fucking horrible and barely a step up from the launch titles of that generation.
itll just be like demons souls all over again
we also know next to nothing about the game realistically
he said a bunch of shit about gadgets and stuff so who knows
im just happy i wont see turtles
It was implied.
Making the game run smoother, fixing bugs and making sure everything works correctly is done at the last few months before the game comes out.
Why devs do this to themselves I would never know, some have horrible crunch time schedules.
Did you not read what I said?
The game isn't ready for a public showing.
If Nintendo can showcase their game to the public its obviously further in development and more stable to be shown.
Show me all the games he's made with a generic western (hurr so realistic look at all the grey, brown, and bloom guys!) art style.
There are none, because one cornerstone of Suda games are unique art styles, and it's one of the best things about them. Let it Die is fucking sickening and made me want to throw up.
Okay, that's it. I'm hyped. This sounds like a fun game. Forget about whether or not it has a good story, whether or not it has good graphics, or any other bullshit. This sounds like a fun game
>Is there anyone legitimately excited for this game?
>like the exact same thing as before.
Tell me YOU are being ironic here.
>I mean, it just seems like the exact same thing as before, but with certain features removed
It worked for Dark Souls 2. Don't be surprised, they'll take anything remotely similar, they genuinely believe this is the epitome of gaming, and the developers will be dumbing these games down until they sell enough to justify continuing the rehash train.
>Actually I'm sure there will be a ton of scrubs crying about no shields.
But I still remember the moment I dropped my shield in DaS and just worked on rolling.
It was so much more satisfying than just blocking everything.
Pretty hyped for Bloodborne.
I was excited for it until I saw the gameplay. Its literally the exact same thing as Dork Soles, just re-skinned. They've even go as far as to re-use the exact same slash and strike sound effects from the last three games. I'm not excited. Here I though we'd be getting something new.
I have played 700 hours of DaS1, 9 characters.
I have played 300 hours of DeS, 3 characters
I have played and am currently playing DaS2, 400 hours in, 5 characters.
I am very excited for any Hidetaka Miyazaki that isn't a mech game.
>rolling from a gunshot/shotgun/musket etc
He is, you complete retard. Do your research before flaunting around like a retard.
>resorting to strawman
Okay, we're done, you're obviously retarded and have nothing of value to say.
That's not true though.
F2P and sub-based games don't require it, all other online games do.
However, even that's not accurate because things like Driveclub still allow you to compete with your friends when it comes to the challenges.
So, basically, I don't know, but there's no way with live online will it be without plus.
To be fair, Splatoon actually had over an hour of gameplay shown to the general public. That's a much nicer concept than having 20 minutes shown to press behind closed doors and showing nothing to the public.
the difference is that the gameplay in the series has slowly gotten clunkier and slower in order to make the game seem more difficult, dark souls 2 being the absolute worst offender
the fact that theyre actually speeding shit up and removing shields in favor of a system that is quick and responsive (even more so than DeS) is pretty fking great
>everything works correctly is done at the last few months before the game comes out.
no, unless you are shitty at developing cycles.
if you do this and there's an error that need a compete overhaul of something then you are ending up wiht a huge problem. Optimization comes togheter with developing and at many stages or goals of them you dont leave it at last unless you are a coding god, wich form isnt
and i think it should be noted and criticised since it affects the quality of the overall game.
Also this isnt a PRE-alpha
i would doubt is an alpha even, you dont find this shit on an alpha and the game is coming in less than a year.
To me it sounds almost exactly like Hollowing.
Tainted/Pure Blood is just Souls/Humanity, beast mode is hollowed mode.
"Visuals" changing probably just means your character looks different, like being hollowed did in Dark Souls.
"Gameplay" changing probably means something tiny like being auto-summoned as a beast invader in other people's worlds or something.
I'm really hype for this game because I'm a huge DeS/DaS fan, but let's be realistic. It's From we're talking about.
>to be fair a game near completion hadpublic footage and a game in alpha wasn't public because retards would take to the internet with >5fps djhdixhdhdbd
What a compelling argument.
So basically, you have no counter argument. The game's art style is dogshit, it's nothing like what Suda would do if he was given a choice (he was almost certainly forced to change it from what they had going with Lily, which is something I'd actually expect him to do), and now it has been turned into a western shit stain style that can be found in 10 thousand other games.
>a game in alpha
If Boodbourne was in alpha they would barely even have an engine to show pre-rendered footage in, the amount of armchair developers in this thread is astounding.
>What are placeholders?
>B-but its a beta!
Because shields were mandatory in the last games right?
>Enemies are not static in levels.
That's nice, so now it'll take slightly longer for the same area to become repetitive
>Bosses will ambush you without a fog gate.
>What is DDF ng+?
again, nothing new
They'll probably be pretty easy to avoid.
If they're anything like crossbows they'll probably have a noticeable wind up animation, and will most likely shoot where you are at that moment rather than where ever you end up. If it just tracks you then timing it with invincibility frames will make it no different than evading homing arrows from crossbows.
>unreleased trailer from 9 months ago.
>It has a unique art style
>It's a new IP
>It has a really unique concept of gameplay
>So it's kiddy shit
I feel bad for you people. You really limit what experiences you get to enjoy.
>Nintendo blew Sony the fuck out pretty easily
I actually own a Wii U and the only stuff Nintendo showed that I'm hyped about are X and Bayo 2, both of which I've known about since 2012.
I'm skeptical about Zelda since the last two main series games have been dogshit.
So overall the PS4 presentation actually got me more hyped and I don't even own one.
I gave up on video games entirely until I played Dark souls 1. I played Dark souls 1 for almost 1500 hours. I played Dark Souls 2 for 350 hours. I played Demons Souls multiple times through after buying a PS3 specifically to play it.
Yes. I am legitimately excited. Yes I will be buying a PS4 for this game and this game alone. I fully expect it to be the best game released since Dark Souls 1.
That's not a new thing, that's removing a thing.
>Enemies are not static in levels.
That's such a basic thing that it's kind of stupid that they're only just implementing that now.
>Bosses will ambush you without a fog gate.
Not new. Asylum Demon didn't have a fog gate the first time and Stray Demon doesn't have a fog gate. Also depending on whether you call some enemies bosses or not because there were enemies in Dark Souls that definitely seemed like they could have been bosses that didn't have fog gates, like the Hydra in the Darkroot Basin.
Are you retarded?
Every attack is slow and unresponsive as fuck compared to 1, and has incredibly obvious input lag and recovery lag before and after every attack. The only exception is daggers, and they're still slower than they were in 1. Dark Souls 2 is objectively the most sluggish and unresponsive game of the series.
This isn't even an opinion.
Nobody has ever mocked up a demo that showed so little, but also managed to look so poor before, that's for sure.
It would have been better to not show anything frankly, and i'm saying this as someone who owns a PS4, currently this is one of the only good things to look forward to, and there are people shitting all over these threads because they displayed it poorly.
Yeah that doesn't happen at all. Now tell me did Demons Souls have this shit of a frame rate in this area when it finally came out?
not that anon, but I think comparing speeds is a weird thing to do with Das 1 and 2 because some things are faster and other things are much much slower. For instance in 2 running is faster, but you can't run for NEARLY as long. Combat in general seems faster, but that may be a placebo affect because you're forced to face a lot of enemies at once so you need to play differently. Another weird anomaly is that even at 105 AGI estus drinking is comparitively slow to 1 where you drink like a champ
>That's not a new thing, that's removing a thing.
And replacing it with something else + an entirely different playstyle (offensive vs defensive).
>Not new. Asylum Demon didn't have a fog gate the first time and Stray Demon doesn't have a fog gate
>using m+kb without autohotkey
>bitching about input lag
Kirby and the Rainbow Curse
Yoshi's Wolly World (besides the music, actually looks like a good Yoshi game)
On the side of confirmations
>2D and 3D Metroid being worked on
>SMTxFE still in development and on track
>New FE game in development
>New Advance Wars in conceptual stages
You don't have to be excited for many or any of them to admit that Nintendo had a much better showing.
>This isn't even an opinion.
Of course it isn't. You are in fact fucking wrong.
It is very noticeable on heavy weapons.
Try to using one in DaS1 and compare the same weapon in DaS2.
>Now tell me did Demons Souls have this shit of a frame rate in this area when it finally came out?
No, because they worked on it both before that showing you're linking, improving it to the point where it was at, and then worked after that, during the development cycle, to make sure it wouldn't all be on the back end. That's why it didn't release with that framerate, you are incredibly ignorant.
I played on the ps3, though
I legitimately have no idea how anyone could consider Dark Souls 2 faster. It's not even a matter of opinions, it's like literally seeing that one is in fact slower than the other and just consciously choosing not to believe it.
> this stupid.
Brother are you fucking kidding right now. If you can't optimize properly, you can't beta test properly. You can't really beta test your own game if it runs at silky smooth 15fps on an area that is as utterly consuming and allreducing as a fucking tower with a little road ontop of it?
I don't even know how to game developer but you seem to also lack common sense
Nigger I mained a strength build with heavy weapons in Dark Souls 1 and 2. How can you even make that point? It's fucking baffling. Every single attack has noticeably more wind up, and has noticeable more recovery time after before you can swing again or roll.
Stamina has nothing to do with it. It's attack and recovery frames.
Because you're doing over half of the shitposting. There's also revenge shitposting for all the "NEVUR EVEUR" threads that are popping up every single day around here.
1 game on 2015 with silky smooth -15 fps. Thanks Sony.
>just don't pretend nintendo is a weeb machine when it never was nor does it try to be. :^)
>Nigger I mained a strength build with heavy weapons in Dark Souls 1 and 2. How can you even make that point?
So do I. When was the last time that you played Dark Souls1. Just curious.
>you are incredibly ignorant
And you are incredibly hypocritical. You just said what I have been saying.
> because they worked on it both before that showing you're linking, improving it to the point where it was at, and then worked after that, during the development cycle, to make sure it wouldn't all be on the back end.
What do you think is the case here with Bloodborne?
If you were to even bother looking at the gamersyde video, just like the bloodborne video above. There is a no photography sign, meaning the game wasnt meant for public showing yet, due to the game not being optimized yet.
The game never shipped out with those frame dips in that area.
there's a big difference in time for des demo and release than bloodborn.
bloodpborn is in more of a hurry.
And while that part didnt have, does that emant demosouls was out of framrate issues?
Better world, shit ton of voice acting, tons of unique characters, fucking huge world, better graphics, etc.
Boss battles don't make the game suddenly more complex from a developer standpoint.
You're retarded. Its only a tutorial level when you fight the asylum demon.
>+Basically Souls gameplay but instead of ghosts of players, you will see ACTUAL players running around in your world.
So does this mean what it sounds like it means, or is OP just twisting it to sound better? Because this sounds fucking great.
Jesus christ fuck you. Stop fromdroning like fuck. Making your game dependent on an online component whilst being largely single-player in design.
Literally cancerous opinion.
>Covenants were optional.
>PVP was optional.
>To play the game without crippling negative effects you must PVP and be MLG.
Fuck off From.
>inb4 mad-mustard, I've got a PS4 and wanted this but now I'm not sure.
On 'a tank full of shit' topic
>mods deleting 1/2 of the posts saying the game is bad
>mods deleting posts that say exclusives are bad
>mods deleting posts about >nogaems
Well I don't know what's happening, but ok.
Des first shown at TGS 2008, which is September.
Game came out in Japan February 5, 2009.
What was that that you were saying? A big time? i dont think so.
Bloodborne wont be coming out till sometime next year.
where are the famitsu/dengeki scans and translations?
But then where were all the tutorial messages the second time around?
Nowhere, because its not a tutorial anymore you dumb fuck.
Stop being so butthurt because you were proven wrong about bosses without fog gates
>Just a set amount of players in a world on each server
>You can come across players and trade items with them
>Shoot them off of bridges and ledges or activate traps.
>Or choose to ignore them completely
and i said that's the point
a 20 year old studio cant still code for shit in 2014 and their games suffer becasue it. There's no reason to defend that in this thread, people should ask more form from specially in a consoles 3x powerful than a ps3 and with a far easier architecture.The game might still be good, but it will suffer from the studio technical mediocrity.
Im not a dev and I wont lie and claim to be. I also wont waste my time anymore on this subject, you can believe whatever you want to believe.
Look at any behind the scenes making of any game being made for a console, or better yet when its in a transition period. Ps2 to Ps3 or Ps3 to Ps4.
You would keep hearing the same thing, the devs just want the game up and running, even if its at 10FPS, as they develop the game or work with new hardware they "optimize" to make it run well up until launch
Not him but it makes sense to me
Why would you bother with optimization except towards the end of the dev cycle? Your main concern is "I need this game to run on my own hardware" not "I need this game to run really well and be well optimized". Once the game is nearing completion you can optimize it. How would you even begin to do that until the game was practically finished anyway? Why the fuck would you optimize an earlier build that will be completely irrelevant a month later?
Not that this will be well optimized since most games aren't and this is From we're talking about.
I remember hoping the torch would be used for unlocking stuff, kinda like how in OOT you light stuff and a door opens. I ran around lighting every torch I could but nothing happened sadly. The torch is so useless.
>+Project Beast trailer is one year old and was pre alpha, Bloodborne shown at E3 was alpha.
What is alpha in this day in age of gaming anyway...
>+Using torch and lantern will be crucial, pitch black areas.
We all know this idea is going to get scrapped hard due to hardware limitations... I mean common, they can't even break 1080p with 60 fps... What makes em think they'll be able to do a lighting system like this.
the cutscenes and stuff always seemed so much cooler than the (still cool) stuff that was in the games
kind of like lotr in a way
all the really badass powerful shit died a really long time ago and now youre just wandering whats left of it
>this whole post
oh yea i better check 8 thousands lines of code hopeing to reduce the work in one run than doing it by parts when each segment finish.