>The issue of the engagement of Geralt was for us, the writers, one of the most difficult problems to solve. The trouble came from couple of reasons:
>- Many players don't know Yennefer at all. The forum is not representative in this respect, because it brings together the core fans and the game will be played by a wider range of people.
>- Triss was Geralt's partner in the previous installments of the game, but again you have to acknowledge the fact, that not every player will be familiar - for example, many console players.
>- From books we know, that Yennefer had a particular bond with Geralt. But the common experiences of Triss are livelier and more up to date. And sincere (because of amnesia).
>- Oh and do not forget about Ciri. She's not a sexual partner, but then, love life is not just about sex. If Ciri is back in Geralt's life, it must be assumed, that Geralt begins to look at the world with her mind (sorry enigmatic, but do not want to reveal the details).
>- There's plenty of other novelties and subtleties and various design issues that deserve separate treatment.
>In any case, we had different ideas on how to implement threads of Geralt's relationships with the girls. Each of them had its advantages and disadvantages. As a result, we decided to do it according to three principles:
>- So that the player was able choose his own way.
>- So we can reproduce the situation from the books as well as possible and to create NPC of flesh and blood.
>- So that we liked it. (Contrary to what people think, we often do things, that we do not like, but we know that will appeal to players).
>The result is this: we have provided interesting female characters with their advantages and disadvantages, not shown merely as a partner for romance and we put your hero in certain situations with these girls. Also we try to choice was difficult. *
You [as fans] have the context in mind - wider or narrower, depending on whether you read the book and played the previous games - and given in the situation, choose what you want.
I think it's a good deal.
>* Tough choice = tears, guilt, sleepless nights, silent "sorry", kissing a print a screenshot, maybe even rage quit ... (*dreamy*)
>Oh and do not forget about Ciri
>She's not a sexual partner
>Replying to a comment referencing to dating sims (jokingly).
>It is not like that.
>At the shallowest level, you choose between two cool girls, with whom you shared the past.
>But there is a deeper layer - hidden feelings, the choice between pride and love, between care and selfishness, between comforting someone and awakening their illusions.
>Seriously - you will be the ultimate judge, because between the intention and the realization - the gap can often be immense. It may ultimately be a big 'meh'. The only thing I can promise is that we tried to do everything so that everyone, sensitive to the emotional relationships between the characters and to the meta-gameplay, will be happy.
>This part is much more emotional, than the previous ones.
>I'm not saying that everyone will cry like a beaver [that's a polish phrase - means CRY VERY VERY MUCH], but in my opinion, there should be tissues with tasteful wolf logo in the Collector's Edition.
>Smiki55: "Bad. Very bad.. If you want to create a masterpiece, it must be appealing to you in the first place."
>In video games the ultimate director and "final contractor" is the player. Especially in Witchers, where the story can be told in different ways. Writer is satisfied when the player can play in their own way and feels, that he got everything he needed to enjoy the game. This goal must be achieved in spite of a writer to various technical, production and budget constraints.
>My satisfaction comes not from the story perfectly the way I would like, but IMO from player satisfaction. Perhaps masterpieces follow different rules, but it's hard for me to speak subjectively, because I've never created a masterpiece and I don't know how it really is. The only thing I can base things upon is my professional experience.
Game is gonna be shit and souless, like Elder Scrolls.
I don't care about any of them. I was actually annoyed how much Triss romance was forced in the second game even though I actively tried to avoid it.
this game will be so weird. they're gonna introduce a 30ish looking bitch and tell us we have to choose between her and our redhead. they'll then proceed to introduce a 20ish looking hottie and tell us that's our estranged "daughter" we're not allowed to fuck. and they're not even related. and even if they were geralt's still sterile so it's not like that'd even be an issue anyhow.
>go rescue triss
>tell her that she lied to you and tell her than you don't trust her anymore
It's an open world 20% bigger than Skyrim. I have a hard time believing it won't suck, there's no way in hell they're filling up all that space with interesting content to do.
>This part is much more emotional, than the previous ones.
Prepare to feel edition
Well, the bigest flaw of skyrim wasn't that it had small ammount of content. But that the content was unimaginative, uncreative and shitty. There was literally no memorable character in skyrim in was damned sandbox game. You go in full arround a little and that's it.
To players who didn't read the books, he knows jack shit.
He's spouting names and events that mean nothing to them.
And you expect them pulling off a Skyrim's worth of worthwhile content? Keep dreaming, the amount of space they'll have to fill will inevitably lead to the game being worse as a result. This is why I hate when people sneer at linear games and think that having an open world automatically makes the game better.
Yeah, yeah of course.
I just hope they meant it when they said he has his memories back, as I would be really annoyed if their way of introducing Yen is to have him discover memories of her or some shit.
Had enough of that int the first two.
He has fully recovered his memory by the end of 2nd game.
He basically went to search for Yen, gets to the Emprah and is told that Ciri is alive and about, so he goes to search for her as well.
I don't think I'll even consider dropping Triss. Red heads are red heads. Gotta stay true to those values.
I don't think getting his old memories back means he forgot what happened during his amnesiac state
so his romantic encounters and adventures with triss are "fresher" than those with yenn now that he remembers his past
plus him and yenn was always a rocky relationship, they are like the ross and rachel of the witcher universe
I wonder how far into the game you have to get before we meet Ciri. Yen seems to be fairly early on and I hope Ciri isn't too late either as we'll need time to build that relationship.
God, I hope there's a couple of cosy quests just related to trying to parent Ciri and berate her for her life choices while giving her a bath.
>Reading the books atm
>That part where Yen talks about how she'd like to retire with Geralt in a little cottage and live off the land
pls make it happen, CDPR
>while giving her a bath
she's 23 years old, dude
she won't let you fucking bathe her
They dont have to "fill" it with contents. Just design plenty of interesting contents tied in with players frequent roads and hiddens one that can only be discovered by taking time with the game. Provide players early with quick or instant mean of travelling to avoid bore. The rest of the world is there to provide some eye candies and atmospheres.
Knowing cdpr, each side quests could take hour to complete.
I guess it all depends on how much time we'll actually spend with her in 3. I mean, it's not like you were together with Triss *that* much in the first ones - they could catch up.
But yeah, I'm sure most people who don't really know much about the series beforehand are going to pick Triss.
I do wonder if Triss truly loves Geralt or if it's more the aspect of the unattainable since she knows the relantionship is unlikely long term because of Yen.
Would be kinda funny if you choose her in the end and the epilogue shows Triss getting tired of Geralt after a few weeks.
>I was actually annoyed how much Triss romance was forced in the second game
I even chose not to rescue Triss when given the choice. It's clear she is just a lying bitch and is using Geralt just for her own goals.
Also the redhead form is not likely her true form.
>I'm sure most people who don't really know much about the series beforehand are going to pick Triss.
That depends on how likable will ingame Yen be.
I'm not holding my breath, considering I know her, but HEY, Yen has now amnesia as well! she might end up being pretty damn cute and likable.
I've never read the books and I'm picking Triss. She's nice, smart, hot, loves Geralt unconditionally, etc. Yennefer sounds like a turbocunt whenever described by someone on /v/. Also, she's not as hot.
Both Gothic games and Morrowind managed to do the same in similar ways even though the world was about 60% the size of TW3 world. what makes you think a talented studio couldn't pull off the same thing on a bigger scale a decade later?
It's not *that* forced though.
You don't have to fuck her, admit you love her or anything of the sort. In fact, you can tell her you think she's a conniving ho in the end if you feel like it.
>And you expect them pulling off a Skyrim's worth of worthwhile content?
no, because Skyrim boasts 200 hours of content and The Witcher boasts a 36 hour campaign and 100 hours of total content. so basically im expecting the witcher 2 but better in terms of main campaign and basically a well designed open world game with sidequests alongside that
Wtf are you talking about? It was sarcasm. She was reading Geralt's mind and it was Geralt who wanted to live off the land in a little cottage with her. She as a powerful and independent woman didn't share his vision of happiness. That's what feminism looks like when you have a decent writer.
>4 years later
>still this mad about people who understood Letho and let him live
>Many players don't know Yennefer at all.
I have 0 knowledge about witcher outside of the games and i know who yennefer is. What the fuck?
Theres a long ass cutscene explaining it.
I understood Letho. I also understood that he was just a peon, a powerful and very dangerous peon who would keep assassinating high value targets for Emperor Emhyr and as such I couldn't let him live.
That would both be good and would suck. It was intended to be one of those "never explained" things.
But still, it's the single one thing I can't get my mind off from the books.
>people who understood Letho and let him live
if you actually understood Letho you'd ahve understood that he can never be trusted and has the capacity to literally destroy the stability of the world
there is only one good reason for each option. either you let him love in repayment for him saving Yennifer and/or Triss and realizing that he's not your enemy or you kill him because he's too dangerous to the people you care about to be left alive. either those or you're an idiot
The last wish was Geralt wishing for
a kid. It was already granted.
Maybe you got lost in English translation or you just didn't pay the attention but I just say how it was - She is a feminist and even though she loves Geralt she would never become your perfect housewife - in fact you should romance Trist if you want a waifu.
Yen is not all bad, she's just very possessive.
But it is overrated as fuck
Sure Gothic 2 had some fucking amazing quest design but even Oblivion had good quests yet people understand that Oblivion is a shitty broken game
Gothic and Risen have horrible awkward combat, shitty interface and generic as fuck setting
Also a lot of the game despite having great quest design feels meh
>/v/ suddenly actually hates CDPR
what the fuck happened?
Yea I remember this too. Kinda fucking weird because I'm pretty sure both fragments we are talking about are coming from the very same book.
It's either Geralt not knowing what he really wants or him just hating a loud and dirty medieval town.
There is no such thing
I actually believe that all of the RPG genre is very flawed and I like RPGs, I am a /tg/ fag
But most of the complaints aimed at any RPG can be aimed at all of them
If you are searching for best cRPG you could say Gothic 2 or Deus Ex or Morrowind or Planescape or Baldurs Gate or whatever but complaints that /v/ likes to throw around like
>It's a movie
>It has shit combat
>It's bugy as fuck
>It's clunky as fuck
apply to all of them at least partially
contrarian 4chan culture. cdpr had so much love for so long that it was inevitable. they don't actually hate them, they're just trying to be cool.
All of their games have been designed in a way that would make them accesible to people who had not read the fucking books. The whole of the amnesia subplot in the first two games existed for that fucking reason to begin with.
because that's OOC for geralt
the witcher is a unique RPG because the dialogue choices aren't ever opposing geralt's established philosophy, the differing choices refer to geralt's (the player's) mood, priorities, and personal opinion of an event
this isn't a bioware RPG where you can choose to be the paragon of justice or a complete bastard because your character is a completely blank slate and the choices are LITERALLY spelled out for you (X is good guy choice, Y is bad guy choice) either by their position in a conversation or by colour coding the dialogue choice
It's probably just as much to avoid bad press and to not directly fuck over new players.
Just imagine if every review says "omg i don't understand what's going on, who are these people" - it wouldn't be very good press.
How about /v/ is not one person and liking a studio is retarded? Like you can like their actions or whatever but liking a fucking corporate entity is legitemately retarded.
post yfw you realize that there's only 3 months until it comes out
I still have this and no money to spare
You type like you''re in high school and you're acting like it too.
>Berserk, told via item descriptions and DLC
Triss literally looked like a tranny in TW2 though. Yennefer doesn't look like she has quite as much of a manjaw but her face still looks weird.
>liking a fucking corporate entity is legitemately retarded
Good thing they're rebels.
Im going to buy mine in December. Got msi 280x but it has some fking overheating issues so I'll just sell it on ebay. Thinking about Gigabyte or Asus. Fuck MSI and their Gaming series. Never had an Asus GPU - Gigabytes are based but I'm kinda concerned about the actual size of GPU.
>pleb cant handle the fact that true RPG put you in the shoe of your character. With all of their limitations.
>pleb want a story conform to themselves regardless of logic. Thus regard their action's consequeneces "movie"
>pleb think rpg mean doing cool thing that exponentially increase with their stats
>pleb want less thinking in game.
Triss looked great, Yenn looks great, and your mother looks like a tranny, faggot.
>-Triss was Geralt's partner in the previous installments of the game, but again you have to acknowledge the fact, that not every player will be familiar - for example, many console players.
Oh yay, it's "the finale is the perfect entry point to the series" bullshit again, thanks consoles.
>Triss literally looked like a tranny in TW2 though
stop, drop, and roll your fat fuck ass out of your room once in a while
jesus you waifu fags should fuck off and go back to jerking off to skyrim porn
This looks like a tranny to you?
Meanwhile with Ciri, perfect facial structure of a supermodel, looks like she's in her early 20s rather than 30s, has a scarred and tired face but it just makes her look more cute than like a beast.
>Being this mad just because you like ladyboys and are afraid to realize it
> Want a new rig for TW3
> But my bike for commuting needs replacement too, way too small and rundown.
> Clothes too, baggy and faded by now faded.
> Really should move out as well.
> Earning about 250$ equivalent monthly
E... Eastern europe rules guys... it really does...
So what exactly are you trying to say? Either I have a really shitty grasp on English language, am drunk or that didn't make any goddamn sense.
This is many main worry. It happened to Gothic 3.
Considering they're bring back getting drunk from the first game? People do some ridiculous shit when they're drunk, even Geralt is proof of that. Remember 'riding whore's asses'?
Nice try buddy.
Jesus fuck, even worse than the concept art. THIS deserves trigger warnings.
He will giver her what she deserves.
I never cared about From enough to actually do research. I guess you actually do learn something new every day.
>flipped the bird to destiny and the faggot elf ghost who was haunting me in w1
>know that triss has ulterior motives, still fug her whenever possible
>dump her ass if the woman steps out of line
jesus how beta can you fags be.
well fuck yen then
stupid bitch who goes around and fucks every wizard she sees.
not gonna lie when I read that part of the book it made me feel like shit.
triss all the way motherfuckers
All I want is Geralts Witcher 2 face. Is that too much to ask?
>for dice rolls and d&d rulesets turn based is a must. it cannot be accurately translated to real time.
See, this is actually an argument, but it's not a good one, because perfectly accurate translation of the DnD ruleset into the game has no inherent value.
Dice rolls are awful though. They're used in D&D because it's the only thing that works in real life. Genre should focus on making Action RPGs more inventive and in depth, fuck turn based games.
>there are none with good rtwp combat.
Except, you know, all the ones with good rtwp combat. Like BG and IWD, there's a reason gamers have been screaming for a Infinity-style game for years, and why people had such high hopes for the Dragon Age franchise.
No one knows what's legit at this point because CDPR essentially has no PR standards aka they don't release carefully doctored screenshots so you have shit from old render versions and whatnot still circulating about.
fine, i get what you're trying to say about arguments. i had a statement with an argument to back it up. but to move on
>accurate translation of the DnD ruleset into the game has no inherent value
it does when game balance and skill is attempting to emulate it rather than innovate a system of it's own.
>also it's far better.
Defense force, plz.
the model is identical with the others, just more detailed.
you can jut shave him if you want
don't do that
>Genre should focus on making Action RPGs more inventive and in depth, fuck turn based games
i agree and disagree. the action rpg genre is by far the better choice for roleplaying video games but turn based has it's merits and can be fun. strategy rpg's still have their place in the gaming world and can be amazing
>Pretty unrealistic but would buy even dlc.
>the model is identical to the others
It's not. The early witcher 3 trailers yes but the newer ones they definitely gave him a more "handsome" look. He needs to look more scary like before.
>They're used in D&D because it's the only thing that works in real life.
This statement shows your unfamiliarity with tabletop.
What is the value of a perfect emulation in itself? Do people play video games because of that? I certainly didn't, even as a DnDfag.
what I'm afraid of is TES babbies playing this game and complaining to CDPR about not knowing jack shit about the story since it isn't spoonfed to them and they haven't read the books.
>yfw when there is a stillborn kid that went out the wrong way hanging from the crone on the right
>hopeless for not liking a shit story
>you need to find what works best
and implementing a turn based system into real time without modfying the ruleset is not what's best
also i havent played that game but if the combat sucked it was probably just because it was a shit implementation of it
If the long hair is the only thing that distinguishes your females from your males then it's a manface.
I'm pretty sure that's mainly stuff that didn't make it into gold version and they're doing it so people wouldn't return their games for store credit or whatever immediately upon completion. As someone buying the damn thing on PC it's an added bonus.
I laughed so goddamn hard when I got there holy shit
Will W3 get modding tools years late like W2?
But Geralt obviously HAS mellowed out now that he has recovered his memories and is looking for the closest thing he has to a daughter. Everything shown so far has revealed he's much more personable and even laughs once in a while.
>tfw you know TW3 will be a good game no matter what because it wasn't rushed to shit like every single game of 2014
If they know what's good for them, they'll release it within 6 months before the game fades into obscurity which was what happened with 2. Which is really too bad considering the kit is insanely indepth.
>implying I will be able to choose
after reading Season of Storms, it has really become pretty clear that Geralt should stay away from sorceresses and just fuck random wenches that threw themselves at him at his will
>They changed it.
It's what they do.
that armor was so swag i hope there will be something similar with 'purity seals'
You are literally a Witcher 1 player complain about Witcher 2 face all over again.
It's three big zone you can seamlessly travel back and forth. What's unclear is whether you'll have to unlock them first, but I assume yes.
Post yfw blowing loads on dem freckles
I used to be as autismal about the face as you are now, but it really is just 90% angles and lighting that makes the difference. Also the thicker beards will make him look better I recon.
But really, if they just made him paler he would be pretty much perfect.
I think he's still got the same structure, he just gained some fat and got a little bearmoded. It kinda fits if he's going to be sort of a father figure in this game. He also just looks more tired of all the shit in the world and more ready than ever to settle down.
Next book comes out on June in my language and I'm not reading it in English.
This is what true suffering is.
At least I get to read
kind-of-rape-between-girlsso there's that, I guess.
Holy shit, Vesemir, who the fuck holds their sword like that? Are you high on potions again?
How do you think Vesemir reacted when Geralt met back up with him having completely destroyed salamandra?
>WE HAVE VITAL NEW INFORMATION, THEY ARE TRYING TO CREATE WITCHERS BE CAREFUL
>she will never look that good in-game
>you will never fuck a Triss cosplayer
>people think witcher 2 triss looked bad.
why even live?
Don't tell me what I can't do
>Is that a legitimate redesign?
We both had a confirmation and a deny on forums, which ether implies they intentionally try to mislead, or that its still not final.
>Bought a 980
>Struggles with most Ubishit games
>Still 3 months to go
Don't shit the bed with this one CDProjekt. PLEASE OPTIMIZE IT, FOR ME.
post yfw because of a flashback you fight bonhart
I'd like to kill that cunt firsthand
do you also get to meet regis? I was extremely sad when he died
Great job taking things out of context.
He'll be back in a couple of centuries.
Yeah but wild hunt is the name of the group, not tits king
I honestly think Marcin has no fucking clue whats he talking about, the wording implies that he ether dosnt know the difference or that he is talking about something else.
We definitely need to have some cosy tier quests like in tw1 that involves getting pissed with your homies and doing dumb stuff.
Seems like the pace of the game would lend itself quite well for it.
>remember how that relationship was the best thing in your shitty life, even though Yen is an intolerable bitch most of the time
>remember your daughteru
>decide to go have awesome adventures with her as a grumpy old man
>realize Triss is pretty awesome
>we'll bang when we get back to Caer Morhen, okay?
>civil war going on
>shit is empty as fuck no battles going on
>there is a war going on
they better deliver some realistic war feeling
Those wenches are total
brosfrom the books.
Gay men are the master race.
Gay facial characteristics are those of pure Aryans - strong jaw, small nose, big eyes, "elegant" face shape (not primitive and beastlike).
It's not /pol/tardation to point out that male homosexuals are next step in human evolution.
>they better deliver some realistic war feeling
The trailer was off to a good start.
Slav technosorcery can only do so much for Bioware's Aurora engine.
I pray to god that I'll actually be able to wear a cloak in game, like the ones in the CGI trailers.
Capes or kilts wont fucking cut it, I mean a big fucking wooly cloak. I mean just look at games that don't have cloaks. Garret from Thief originally had a cloak, they took it away in the remake and gave him some shitty latex suit instead. Look how shitty that game was. Skyrim? nocloaks.jpg. Shitty game, what are the odds? See where I'm getting at here?
Go ahead, visit the place and tell me it's not a complete sausagefest.
It's quite the contrary: /pol/ turning gay is the next logical step since feminism alienated them from women, so they might as well fuck one another.
Because real-time reflections are archeotech, its creation is lost wisdom of the ancients.
That explains everything.
They used some incredible slavic sorcery to make the Neverwinter Nights engine look amazing.
This is the best BioWare was able to do with that Aurora engine.
don't forget to for TW3 as the most anticipated game (even if you voted already) - if they win, they will feel obligated to show us some new shit
You can't "turn gay". Either you are a superhuman or a regular heterosexual sheep.
/pol/ could have some homosexuals in denial, but if they were anything more than tiny insignificant minority, it would be a much more intelligent board.
FUCK that noise, these guys are working with Nvidia. I'm sure they could work out some physics based robes. It doesn't even have to be armor.
If I'm riding on Roach's back up a snowy fucking mountain, and Geralt is wearing nothing but his skimpy chain mail armor, it's going to look weird to me. The Bear armor looks cool and all, but it doesn't look warm enough.
don't make it sound better
i fear plot in 3 will be so much fucking forced
hurr durr ciri tris jenefer durr you MUST care abut them
in w1 romances were on secondary issues
now they number one
Or maybe current generation of computers gpu cards isnt powerful enough to do real time reflections ?
Every reflection you see in a game is just the scene rendered a second time, and while years ago rendering a scene twice was no problem, nowadays consoles and pcs are struggling to render it once, yet alone twice.
Its ether a twice simpler scene with reflections, or twice more complex one.
Also sometimes reflections are impossible to do since they cant reflect post effects that will be rendered in second pass.
Thats why screen space reflections were invented, those weird one that dissapear when you look straight at them.
>Either you are a superhuman or a regular heterosexual sheep
You can turn gay.
Some people are more likely to turn gay, some are resistant to it and some are immune to this disease.
Yeah, they probably could've gotten it to work, but I guess they didn't want to prioritize that.
Speaking of which, I'm still dumbfounded why in the ever loving fuck diving mechanics and boat racing is even a part of this game. It's something you're going to use once or twice and then that's it.
>we do not have technology to do real-time reflections
Exactly what I said, lost archeotech of the Ancients
And that's his garden.
You can't get "infected" with having a bigger penis, higher IQ, more masculine facial structure, better reasoning skills and attraction to humans. All of those are characteristics correlating with homosexuality.
You're born a regular sheep, you'll die a regular sheep. Sorry.
Always preferred his look in the first game, he isn't pale enough in the second or third and in the first he looks slim and agile. He's slightly too bulky in the second and the chain shoulders in the third make him look like a brick shithouse as well
Skin/hair/build of the first mixed with the roughness of the second would be closest to the book description. He still looks badass in all of them, but the changes make him look like a brute force-ish fighter as opposed to quick and skilled
>The Witcher didn't even look at all that good at release.
It ran like shit on release but was pretty as is.
Now that's just silly. It looked pretty janky from the first trailer to begin with but it's been a long time since then. Boats for travel? Sure. For racing? I can see the floaty physics already.
>Oh and do not forget about Ciri. She's not a sexual partner
you've failed me the last time, CDPR
>pirated witcher 2
>developer thanks in the credits
Only time i ever felt like shit for hoisting the black flag.
Actually there is no clear border between hetero and homosexual. Some people are just more likely to adopt homosexual life or heterosexual. It's basically a choice, homosexuals are deviants because they choose to be deviants.
FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS WITH EXTREME CAUTION
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS POST
Geralt looks like cheap hamburger superhero dafuq
Every book is good, blood of the elves and times of contempt are the weakest ones, but it starts to pick up after that.Baptism by fire, Tower of Swallow and Lady of the Lake are great
not really, we never had it to begin with
using tricks and hacks will only get you so far, like flipping a room upside down only works when you have no shadows or specular shading, and rendering into texture buffer becomes impossible when scenes become complex
and screen space is screen space, you can only reflect object in your view
we will have to wait at lest 5 more years for path tracing engines that will be able to do reflections 10 years tops, maybe next console generation will be able to do it
>tfw I eventually redeemed myself by buying TW1 and 2 on GoG
Everything is okay.
>You can't get "infected"
It's mental disease so of course you can't get infected. You simply develop it.
>All of those are characteristics correlating with homosexuality.
As you said: they are "correlating" so there is no proof that being gay makes you more intelligent, have greater penis etc.
If your claims are true
you gave me no source so it's empty assumptionit's - most probably - related to the cost of coming out.
Simply speaking: the cost of coming out acts like a filter that prevents stupid gay people to admit they are gay. Only most succesful and most handsome aren't afraid of saying "I'm not gay".
But still there are a fucking lot of dirty, poor and smelly gay who will never admit they are gay.
>we will have to wait at lest 5 more years for path tracing engines that will be able to do reflections 10 years tops, maybe next console generation will be able to do it
Going by how much GPUs changed between current gen and last gen, it's more like 20 years.
>Contrary to what people think, we often do things, that we do not like, but we know that will appeal to players
The fuck is that supposed to mean? What an odd thing to say to their fans. That sounds awfully condescending.
I wonder which past instances they had in mind when saying that.