PlayStation was peak Sony.
Gamecube was peak Nintendo.
Microsoft has never exhibited any noticeable peak in quality and the doctors say it never will.
Any other opinion is false.
>not including handhelds
>nintendo peaking after rare were sold off
>not the worst Nintendo gen ever
Are you fucking serious right now? Zelda was the only series even worth TOUCHING the system for. It was a complete trainwreck, I felt fucking bad for the kids who owned that pile of garbage.
The 3DO was a better fucking choice of console for that generation. That's how bad the N64 was.
>rare games not top tier
Not that there were enough of them to justify the console.
You have shit taste, m8.
There were the Zelda games, indeed, but also:
Super Mario 64
Donkey kong 64
star fox 64
The original goddamn super smash bros
Mario party 2
I could go on.
Nice gag, bro. Sub-par platformers that were destroyed by PS1 exclusives, And a couple of party FPS titles.
Worse version of PD.
>Super Mario 64
One of the worst first party high profile games ever released. Shockingly bad, anyone who mentions this title is instantly regarded as a complete moron.
>Donkey kong 64
Literal shit that chugs along at 5 fps.
I'll give you this one, but still, it's a party game.
Bland RPG garbage.
>star fox 64
Impressive on the SNES, not here.
Worst Kirby title ever.
You're kidding, right?
>The original goddamn super smash bros
A total mess of a game.
>Mario party 2