That disclaimer has been in every AC game since the very first you fat retard.
You probably wouldn't know that though, considering you weren't even born when the first Assassin's Creed was released.
>Too bad it wasn't developed by a team that gave a shit instead
So they can't be criticized for anything being offensive towards a religion, race or gender - as these games are often set in periods where those are oppressed
seriously /v/ use your brains
This pic is from brotherhood
I only played brotherhood to see what the hype was about assassins creed got it for 10 dollars wasn't that bad.But it is rather shallow combatwise and stealthwise.It gets kinda boring but I thought it was worth the 10 bucks.I wouldn't buy any more though
It's strange how they think that mentioning how diverse the Dev team is has anything to do with the actual product.
Does it make the gameplay better?
Does it make the graphics better?
Does it make the story better?
>No (inb4 "Diverse story: we're better because we're different except not really."
>add a random trans character and advertise that fact
>add a female protag because of the retarded backlash against Unity
>add this pointless, contrived quote
>still the lowest-selling main AssCreed game in the series to date
The religion and culture part made sense in the first game and later, but not sexual orientations and gender identities which they just added. That's just pointless pandering and misguided PR.
I love how SJWs like you try to rewrite history to cover your asses when everyone sees you retardation for what it is. Shows how much faith you have in your ideology that you have to keep doing this and making excuses.
They just need to add "racial identities", "medical and neurological conditions", "age", "species", "class" and "hair color" (if it applies) and we'll be halfway there.
I MEAN COME ON, IT'S 2015